[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 2, Issue 4 (1-2018) ::
aapc 2018, 2(4): 215-246 Back to browse issues page
Design of Interpretative-Structural Analysis Model (ISM) Factors Affecting Auditor's Professional Skepticism
Hassan Valiyan 1, Mohammad Reza Abdoli2 , Shabnam Karimi3
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran (Corresponding author) , Behnam.r1986@yahoo.com
2- Associate Professor of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran (Mra830@yahoo.com)
3- Master of Accounting, Gorgan Unit, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:   (6700 Views)
Auditor's professional skepticism is considered as a behavioral and specialized feature that reduces the cost of representing and promoting the general level of the community. Based on this, recognizing personality and behavioral characteristics in enhancing or reducing doubt on auditors' behavior is a matter of great importance. So this research is understandable, By Interpretative-Structural Analysis It seeks to design a model based on categorizing and differentiating the factors influencing professional auditors' skepticism. The research was conducted in a one-year period between June 2016 and June 2017.The combined research methodology is based on the identification of the factors affecting professional skepticism of the auditors by examining theoretical and theoretical foundations and performing the Delphi analysis with the participation of 16 specialist members as panel members, and in the quantitative part through the formation of the matrix Structural self-analysis is sought after structural and interpretive modeling, in which 12 researchers participated in the research. The results of the research show that, the most basic factors of audit auditor's skepticism at the thirteenth level and the twelfth level of auditor's neutrality are surrounded by audit standards, surrounded by audit skills and surrounded by the rules and regulations of the stock exchange, That these indices are related to the subsidiary autonomy and auditor's expertise in Delphi results. Also, at the highest level and in fact the least effective factor on the professional skepticism of the subsequent auditors is the discretion of the component of accountability as a psychological characteristic.
Keywords: Professional Skeptics Auditors, Psychological Characteristics, Personality Characteristics, Professional Skills
Full-Text [PDF 380 kb]   (7636 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/10/7 | Accepted: 2017/11/23 | Published: 2018/01/5
References
1. Agarwalla, S.K., Desai, N., Tripathy, A. (2017). The impact of self-deception and professional skepticism on perceptions of ethicality, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.04.002
2. Agarwalla, S.K., Vesai, N., Tripathy, A. (2017). The impact of self-Veception anV professional skepticism on perceptions of ethicality, http://Vx.Voi.org/10.1016/j.aViac.2017.04.002
3. Andreas, H., Zarefar, A., Rasuli, H. M. (2016). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE AUDITORS’ PROFESSIONAL SCEPTICISM AND AUDIT RESULT QUALITY-THE CASE OF INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT AUDITORS, I J A B E R, Vol. 14, No. 6, 3807-3817.
4. Azar A., Tizro A., Moghbel A., Anvari A. (2010) "Contouring agility moVel of supply chain: Interpretive structural moVeling approach, Management Research in Iran, No. 14, pp. 1-25.
5. Doty, J. R. 2011. What the PCAOB Expects for the Coming Year and Beyond. December, 5, 2011. Washington D.C.: PCAOB.
6. Doty, J. R. 2012. Statement on Public Meeting on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation. June 28, 2012. San Francisco, CA: PCAOB.
7. Franzel, J. 2012. Statement on Public Meeting on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation. June 28, 2012. San Francisco, CA: PCAOB.
8. Glover, S.M. & Prawitt, D. F. (2013). Enhancing Auditor Professional Skepticism. Available at: http: //www.thecaq.org/docs/research/skepticismreport.pdf.
9. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., Jr., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement frauV: Insights from the acaVemic literature. AuViting: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252
10. Hurtt, K., H. Brown-Liburd, C.E. Earley, G. Krishnamoorthy. 2013. Research on auditor professional skepticism – Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Supplement): 45-97.
11. Hurtt, R.K. 2007. Professional Skepticism: An Audit Specific Model and Measurement Scale. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Vol. 29, No. 1, 2010,pp: 149-171
12. Jitesh Thakkar, S.G. Veshmukh, A.V. Gupta anV Ravi Shankar, (2017). “Vevelopment of a balanceV scorecarV An integrateV approach of Interpretive Structural MoVeling (ISM) anV Analytic Network Process (ANP)”, International Journal of ProVuctivity anV Performance Management , 56 ( 1), 25-59.
13. Nelson, M.W. 2009. A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 1-34.
14. PCAOB. 2010a. Report on Observations of PCAOB Inspectors Related to Audit Risk Areas Affected by the Economic Crisis. Release No. 2010-06, September 29, 2010. Washington D.C.: PCAOB.
15. Peecher, M., I. Solomon, and K.T. Trotman. 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 38 (8): 596-620.
16. Singh M.V., Shankar, R, Narain R , Agarwal, (2003), “An interpretive structural moVeling of knowleVge management in engineering inVustries”, Journal of AVvances in Management Research, 1, 28 – 40.
17. Westermann, K, D., Cohen, J. (2014). Professional Skepticism in Practice: An Examination of the Influence of Accountability on Professional Skepticism, Contemporary Accounting Research, 1-46.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Valiyan H, Abdoli M R, Karimi S. Design of Interpretative-Structural Analysis Model (ISM) Factors Affecting Auditor's Professional Skepticism. aapc 2018; 2 (4) :215-246
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-342-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 4 (1-2018) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645