1. Agarwalla, S.K., Desai, N., Tripathy, A. (2017). The impact of self-deception and professional skepticism on perceptions of ethicality, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.04.002
2. Agarwalla, S.K., Vesai, N., Tripathy, A. (2017). The impact of self-Veception anV professional skepticism on perceptions of ethicality, http://Vx.Voi.org/10.1016/j.aViac.2017.04.002
3. Andreas, H., Zarefar, A., Rasuli, H. M. (2016). ANALYSIS OF FACTORS AFFECTING THE AUDITORS’ PROFESSIONAL SCEPTICISM AND AUDIT RESULT QUALITY-THE CASE OF INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT AUDITORS, I J A B E R, Vol. 14, No. 6, 3807-3817.
4. Azar A., Tizro A., Moghbel A., Anvari A. (2010) "Contouring agility moVel of supply chain: Interpretive structural moVeling approach, Management Research in Iran, No. 14, pp. 1-25.
5. Doty, J. R. 2011. What the PCAOB Expects for the Coming Year and Beyond. December, 5, 2011. Washington D.C.: PCAOB.
6. Doty, J. R. 2012. Statement on Public Meeting on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation. June 28, 2012. San Francisco, CA: PCAOB.
7. Franzel, J. 2012. Statement on Public Meeting on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation. June 28, 2012. San Francisco, CA: PCAOB.
8. Glover, S.M. & Prawitt, D. F. (2013). Enhancing Auditor Professional Skepticism. Available at: http: //www.thecaq.org/docs/research/skepticismreport.pdf.
9. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., Jr., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement frauV: Insights from the acaVemic literature. AuViting: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252
10. Hurtt, K., H. Brown-Liburd, C.E. Earley, G. Krishnamoorthy. 2013. Research on auditor professional skepticism – Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Supplement): 45-97.
11. Hurtt, R.K. 2007. Professional Skepticism: An Audit Specific Model and Measurement Scale. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Vol. 29, No. 1, 2010,pp: 149-171
12. Jitesh Thakkar, S.G. Veshmukh, A.V. Gupta anV Ravi Shankar, (2017). “Vevelopment of a balanceV scorecarV An integrateV approach of Interpretive Structural MoVeling (ISM) anV Analytic Network Process (ANP)”, International Journal of ProVuctivity anV Performance Management , 56 ( 1), 25-59.
13. Nelson, M.W. 2009. A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 1-34.
14. PCAOB. 2010a. Report on Observations of PCAOB Inspectors Related to Audit Risk Areas Affected by the Economic Crisis. Release No. 2010-06, September 29, 2010. Washington D.C.: PCAOB.
15. Peecher, M., I. Solomon, and K.T. Trotman. 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 38 (8): 596-620.
16. Singh M.V., Shankar, R, Narain R , Agarwal, (2003), “An interpretive structural moVeling of knowleVge management in engineering inVustries”, Journal of AVvances in Management Research, 1, 28 – 40.
17. Westermann, K, D., Cohen, J. (2014). Professional Skepticism in Practice: An Examination of the Influence of Accountability on Professional Skepticism, Contemporary Accounting Research, 1-46.