[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 6 (2-2019) ::
aapc 2019, 3(6): 65-104 Back to browse issues page
Designing a Model and Assessing the Capabilities of Audit Institutions in Promoting Social Trust
Mehdi Safari gerayli1 , Hassan Valyan 2
1- Associate Professor Department of accounting,Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz,Iran (Mehdi.safari83@yahoo.com)
2- ssistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran (Corresponding author) , Hasan.valiyan@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (2753 Views)
Increasing the number of audit firms and increasing the level of expectations and environmental changes make the issue of competition among audit firms more complex and reveal the levels of information for users and stakeholders more dynamic. The role of audit firms is considered to be critical to the promotion of social trust, and institutions that do not have the ability to compete in this field are condemned to failure. This study sought to understand the role of design and functionality audit institutions in promoting social trust. The Research period is one year from 2016 to 2017. The methodology of research is mixed and the Statistical population consists of two qualitative and quantitative sections. In the qualitative section, 14 faculty members and associate accountants as panel members were selected through a homogeneous sampling method, of which 10 were contributing to the Critical Appraisal papers. In this section, papers similar to the topic of research on the inside and outside were determined based on the score of 50 points, and then the indexes related to the topic were developed in the form of checklists and distributed among 14 members of the panel (experts), based on Delphi indexes Such as average, standard deviation and agreement coefficient, the research indicators are confirmed. In the quantitative section, the target community was composed of 12 auditing firms, with 96 auditors selected through random sampling and Cochran formula selected by auditors working in 12 auditing institutions, and distributed after Delphi verification questionnaires. In this research, two main questions were raised in the qualitative section and two hypotheses were presented in the quantitative section.
 The results were in line with the research questions identified, the capabilities of the audit firms were divided into two internal and external components, each containing 4 indicators. Also, social trust was classified into three components of ethical accountability, legal accountability, and decision making power enhancement based on Delphi analysis and average score scores, standard deviations and agreement coefficients. In order to test the hypothesis of the research in the quantitative part, analysis of variance was used based on average severity test And the results showed that when the dimensions of the internal and external capabilities of the audit firm are matched, the internal capabilities indicators are consistent, and the external capabilities indicators are consistent, while confirming that the audit firm has the capability And empowerment, promotes the level of social trust of stakeholders and decision makers. The results are conceptually consistent with the research by El Ghoul et al (2016) and Ba (2016).
Keywords: Internal Capabilities of Audit Firms, External Capabilities of Audit Firms, Social Trust
Full-Text [PDF 411 kb]   (960 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/01/15 | Accepted: 2018/03/7 | Published: 2019/01/31
References
1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organi-zational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
2. Ardelean, A. (2013). Auditors’ Ethics and their Impact on Public Trust. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 92, 10 October 2013, Pages 55–60.
3. BA. J. E. (2016). Measuring performance audit effectiveness: the case of estonia, Thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Public Administration and Social Policy, University of Tartu.
4. Backof, A. G., Carpenter, T, D., and J. Thayer. (2015). Auditing Complex Estimates: How Do Information Format and Priming Impact Auditors’ Consideration of Inconsistent Evidence?, McIntire School of Commerce 2013 summer research grant and 2011 PwC IN Quires Research Grant.
5. Ball, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors. Accounting and Business Research, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=929-561.
6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1): p. 99-120
7. Berglund, N., & Kang, T. (2013). Does Social Trust Matter in Financial Reporting?: Evidence from Audit Pricing, https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/ACCconf14TKang.pdf
8. Branco, M. C., & Delgado, C. (2012). Business, social responsibility, and corruption, Journal of Public Affairs, 12(4) PP. 357–365.
9. Collis, D. J. (1994). Research note: how valuable are organizational capability? Strateg. Manag. J. 15,143-152.
10. Constantinos, C. D., & Constantinos, M. C., (2003). Responses to disruptive strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 44(2), 55-63.
11. Dietz, G., & Hertzog, D. N. (2006). Measuring Trust Inside Organizations. Personnel Review, 35(5), 557-588. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
12. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11, Special Is-sue), 1105-1121. Retrieved from:
13. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Pittman, J.A., Rizeanu, S., (2016). Cross-country evidence on the importance of auditor choice to corporate debt maturity. Contemporary Accounting Research 33, 718-751
14. Ellonen, R. (2005). The Relationship of Organizational Cultures, Trust and Innovativeness. A Dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology. 15-19.
15. Ellonen, R. Blomqvist, Puumalainen. (2008). The Role of Trust in Organisational Innovativeness European Journal of Innovativeness, 11 (2008), pp. 160–181.
16. Frazier, M. L., P. D. Johnson, M. Gavin, J. Gooty, & Snow, D, B. (2010). Organizational justice, trust worthiness, and trust: A multifoci examination. Group & Organization Management 35 (1): 39–76.
17. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York:Free Press.
18. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology,University of Oxford, chapter 13, pp. 213-237.
19. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environ-ments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Or- ganization Science, 7(4), 375-387. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
20. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
21. Margaret, N. (2014). Competitive Strategies Adopted by Audit Firms in Nairobi, Administration (MBA) Degree, School of Business, University of Nairobi.
22. Martínez-Salgado C. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: basic principles and some controversies. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2012; 17 (3): 613-9.
23. McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2012) The Impact of Religion on Financial Reporting Irregularities. The Accounting Review 87 (2): 645-673.
24. McPhail, K. (2004). An emotional response to the state of accounting education: developing accounting students’ emotional intelligence. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 629–648.
25. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674272286
26. Phua, L. K., Chris, P. (2010). Competitive Advantages of Audit Firms in the Era of International Financial Reporting Standards: An Analysis using the Resource- Based View of the Firm, 2010 International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics. IACSIT Press, Hong Kong.
27. Stalk, G., Evans, P., Shulman, L. E., (1992). Competing on capability: the new rules of corporate strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev.70, 57-69.
28. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
29. Winter, S. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991–995.
30. Zollo, M. Winter, S.G. (2002). “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities.”Organization Science, 13(3), pp.339-351.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

safari gerayli M, valyan H. Designing a Model and Assessing the Capabilities of Audit Institutions in Promoting Social Trust. aapc 2019; 3 (6) :65-104
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-347-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 6 (2-2019) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645