How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline

farajzadeh Dehkordi, Hassan

doi:10.29252/aapc.4.7.181

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Editorial Board

Articles archive

Publication Ethics

For Authors

Peer Review Process

Registration

Site Facilities

Contact us

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 4, Issue 7 (9-2019)

aapc 2019, 4(7): 181-208

Back to browse issues page

How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline

Hassan Farajzadeh Dehkordi Dr

Assistant Professor of accounting, Faculty of financial sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran , ha.farajzadeh@yahoo.com

Abstract: (3116 Views)

CContrary to expectations, ethics research has shown that, accountants earn low ethical reasoning scores in the moral development tests, due to accountants focusing on agreeableness trait. However, ethical tests evaluate agreeableness trait up to the intermediate levels of the moral development model. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between five personality traits and ethical judgments of accounting students compared with management students. The big five personality traits are conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism and openness to experience. I also investigate the relationship between gender and moral judgment. Using a questionnaire and answers provided by 386 accounting and business students, from five universities located in Tehran province, in 2018, results show, accounting students have a higher priority for agreeableness personality trait. But, there is no significant difference between the ethical judgments of accounting and business students. I ﬁnd that those accounting students who do prefer agreeableness trait appear to have lower levels of moral judgment. While this relationship does not exist for the business students. This means that accounting students have different personality traits, influenced by their discipline, and therefore have different moral judgment. Also, for both groups, there is a positive significant relationship between conscientiousness and extroversion with moral judgment and the relationship between neuroticism and moral judgment is negative. Finally, the study of the relationship between gender and moral judgment showed that, according to theory of gender role in socialization, female students tend to have more moral judgments than males.

Keywords: Agreeableness, Big Five Personality Traits, Discipline, Gender, Moral Judgment

Full-Text [PDF 232 kb] (1116 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/04/26 | Accepted: 2019/05/11 | Published: 1901/12/14

References

1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., D. R. L. Gabhart and M. F. Reeves: (1997), Ethical Cognition of Business Students, Individually and in Groups, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1717 –1725.

2. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., W. J. Read and D. P. Scarborough: (2003), Does Selection–Socialization Help to Explain Accountants’ Weak Ethical Reasoning?, Journal of Business Ethics 42(1), 71–81.

3. Abdulmohammadi, M.J. and Baker, C.R. (2006) Accountants value preferences and moral reasoning, Journal of Business Ethics 69(1): 11–25.

4. Aslam, M. S., & Nazir, M. S. (2011). The impact of personality traits on academic dishonesty among Pakistan students. The Journal of Commerce, 3(2), 50–61.

5. Babalola, M. T., Bligh, M. C., Ogunfowora, B., Guo, L., & Garba, O. A. (2017). The mind is willing, but the situation constrains: Why and when leader conscientiousness relates to ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-15.

6. Baker, C. R. (1976). An Investigation of Differences in Values: Accounting Majors vs. Nonaccounting Majors, The Accounting Review, 51(4), 886–893.

7. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.

8. Connor, B., Farley, D. and Wise, G. (2010) Moral Development, Moral Orientation and Personality Types. The International Journal of Learning 16 (1), 335-345.

9. Dalton, D., Ortegren, M. (2011) Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias, Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73-93.

10. Gilligan, C. 1993. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11. Giluk, T. L., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2015). Big Five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 59–67.

12. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative” description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.

13. Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Leist, F., & Heydasch, T. (2013). It takes two: Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 598–603.

14. Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leader behavior and big ﬁve factors of personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 349–366.

15. Kohlberg, L. 1981. The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

16. Lan, G., Gowing, M., McMahon, S., Rieger, F., & King, N. (2008). A study of the relationship between personal values and moral reasoning of undergraduate business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1-2), 121-139.

17. Landry, R., Moyes, D.G. and Cortes, C.A. (2004), “Ethical perceptions among Hispanic students: differences by major and gender”, Journal of Education for Business, 80(2), 102-8.

18. Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J. & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B. (2019) Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 155 (1): 289-304.

19. Marcus, J., Roy, J. (2017) In search of sustainable behaviour: The role of core values and personality traits. Journal of Business Ethics, : 1–17

20. McCrae, R. R., Kurtz, J. E., Yamagata, S., & Terracciano, A. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 28–50.

21. McFerran, B., Aquino, K., and Duffy, M. (2010). How Personality and Moral Identity Relate to Individuals’ Ethical Ideology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 35-56.

22. McPhail, k. 2013. Accounting ethics SAGE: Los Angeles.

23. Mercado, B. K., Dilchert, S., & Giordano, C. A. 2018. Counterproductive work behaviors. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

24. Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39(4), 765–798.

25. Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 533–540.

26. Nei, K. S., Foster, J. L., Ness, A. M., & Nei, D. S. (2018). Rule breakers and attention seekers: Personality predictors of integrity and accountability in leaders. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26(1), 17–26.

27. Nguyen, N. T., & Biderman, M. 2013. Predicting counterproductive work behavior from a bi-factor model of Big Five Personality. In Academy of management conference, Orlando, FL.

28. Pohling, R., Bzdok, D., Eigenstetter, M. et al. (2016). What is Ethical Competence? The Role of Empathy, Personal Values, and the Five-Factor Model of Personality in Ethical Decision-Making, Journal of Business Ethics, 137 (3): 449-474.

29. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2005). Short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Development and validation of an economic inventory for assessment of the ﬁve factors of personality. Diagnostica, 51(4), 195-206.

30. Reidenbach, R. E. and D. P. Robin: (1990), Toward the Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 639–653.

31. Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger Publishers, Inc, New York).

32. Roberts, B. W., & R. Hogan (Eds.),. 2001. Personality psychology in the workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

33. Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117–125.

34. Schinkel, A. & de Ruyter, D.J. (2017). Individual Moral Development and Moral Progress, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (1): 121-136.

35. Simha. A & Parboteeah K. P. (2019). The Big 5 Personality Traits and Willingness to Justify Unethical Behavior—A Cross-National Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, Forthcoming, 1-21.

36. Uysal. Ö. Ö. (2010). Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1): 137–160.

37. Weber, J.: (1993), Exploring The Relationship Between Personal Values and Moral Reasoning, Human Relations 46, 37–54.

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.29252/aapc.4.7.181

‎ 20.1001.1.24767166.1398.4.7.11.2

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

farajzadeh Dehkordi H. How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline. aapc 2019; 4 (7) :181-208
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-625-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 4, Issue 7 (9-2019)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645