[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 5(10): 167-131 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, and Dark Personality Trait on Fraudulent Fiinancial Reporting
Farzaneh Rezazadeh1 , Farzain Rezaei 2, Naser Hamidi3
1- Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University(Brezazade@ ymail.com)
2- Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran (Corresponding Author) , farzin.rezaei@qiau.ac.ir
3- Associate Prof., Department of Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran(nhamidi1344@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (5304 Views)
Psychological variables cause behavioral differences in managers; Therefore, these variables are known to be an influential factor in the intention of fraud in financial reporting. The present study seeks to investigate the effect of self-efficacy, Locus of control and dark personality traits on fraudulent financial reporting. Data that could be tested were collected from 352 observations among financial managers and accountants located in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, and their analysis was performed using Smart PLS3 software and structural equation modeling. The results of statistical analysis showed that dark personality traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, anti-socialism, and sadism) have a positive and significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting, while cognitive characteristics of self-efficacy and Locus of control have no significant effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Also, based on the research findings, self-efficacy and control source have a negative and significant effect on dark personality traits. The results of this study confirm the importance of psychological components in understanding the causes of managerschr('39') unethical behavior that lead to fraud in financial reporting. Therefore, by understanding the psychological components that affect the performance of managers and especially the fraudulent behavior of managers, it is possible to help prevent preventive measures in this area.
Keywords: Self-efficacy, Locus of control, Tetrad of Dark Personality, Fraudulent Financial Reporting.
Full-Text [PDF 332 kb]   (1036 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/06/6 | Accepted: 2020/08/22 | Published: 2021/03/24
References
1. Azzahroh, F., and N. Fajri. 2020. The Effect of Self Efficacy and Fraud Diamond on Fraudulent Behavior Academic Accounting Students. Journal of Business, Management, and Accounting 2 (1): 116-122.
2. Blair, C.A., K. Helland, and B. Walton. 2017. Leaders behaving badly: the relationship between narcissism and unethical leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 32 (2), 333-346.
3. Bong, M. 2001. Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students’ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 26(4): 553–570.
4. Charles, A., and D. Bernadette. 2020. Conceit and deceit: cheating, and stealing among grandiose narcissists. Personality and Individual Differences 154: 1-10.
5. Charles, A., and D. Bernadette. 2020. The joint of narcissism and psychopathy on accounting students attitudes towards unethical professional practices. Journal of Accounting Education 49: 1-24.
6. Cohen, J., Y. Ding, C. Lesage, and H .Stoliwy. 2010. Corporate fraud and managers behavior: Evidence from the press. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2): 271-315.
7. Cory, N., E. Reeves, and G. Martinez. 2015. Moral Disengagement and Locus of Control in Business School Freshmen: Gender Differences. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics 7: 104-115.
8. Dali, N., and M .Arifuddin. 2014. The Impact of Professionalism, Locus of Control, and Job Satisfaction on Auditors' Performance: Indonesian Evidence. International Journal of Business and Management Invention , 3(10):63-73.
9. Diogenes, A. 2017. The dark tetrad of personality and the accounting information quality: The moderating effect of corporate reputation, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of accounting and actuarial sciences, University of Sao Paulo.
10. Gowrisankar, M. 2017. Role of Locus of Control & Emotional Quotient Towards Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 7(1): 28-35.
11. Hammond., S. 2011. The psychometric properties and utility of the short sadistic impulse scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment 23 (2):523-531.
12. Harrison., A. and B. Mennecke. 2016. The Effect of the Dark Triad on Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 153 (2): 1-25.
13. Jaffé. M., R. Greifeneder, and M. Reinhard. 2019. Manipulating the odds: The effects of Machiavellianism and construal level on cheating behavior. PLOS ONE. 14(11): 1-22.
14. Jessica, R. N. Daniel, and M. Steven. 2020. Perceiving opportunities for legal and profit: Machiavellianism the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences 162: 1-4.
15. Johnson, W., W, Xie, and S. Yi. 2014. Corporate fraud and the value of reputations in the product market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25 :16-39.
16. Jonason, P.,and G. Webster. 2020. The dirfy dozen: A concise measure ofthe dark triad. Psychological Assessment. 2010; 22(2):420-32.
17. Jones., D.N. 2016. The nature of Machiavellianism: Distinct patterns of misbehavior. In V.ZeiglerHill & D.K. Marcus (Eds), the dark ide of personality. American Psychological Association.
18. Joshua, C., R. Palmer, J. Holmes, and L. Pamela. 2020. The Cascading Effects of CEO Dark Triad Personality on Subordinate Behavior and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Theoretical Model, Group & Organization Management. 45 (1):1-38.
19. Kontesa, M., Brahmana., R., Tong, A. Narcissistic CEOs and their earnings management. Journal of Management and Governance. 24 (1): 1-27.
20. Lee, S., Su. Jau-Ming, T. Sang-Bing, Lu. Tzu-Li, and W. Dong. 2016. A comprehensive survey of government auditors’ self-efficacy and professional development for improving audit quality. Springer Plus. 5 (1):1-25.
21. Levenson. H. 1973. Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,41(3):397 - 404.
22. Majors, T.M. 2015. The interaction of communicating measurement uncertainty and the dark triad on managers, reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 91 (3): 973-992.
23. Moshagen, M., B. Hilbig, and I. Zettler. 2018. The dark core of personality. Psychological Review, 125 (5): 656–688.
24. Murphy, P. 2012. Attitude, Machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting, Accounting Organizations and Society . 37 (4): 242 -259.
25. OMeara, A., J. Davies, and S. Hammond. 2011. The psychometric properties and utility of the short sadistic impulse scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment. 23 (2): 523-531.
26. Olsen, K., and J. Stekelberg. 2015. CEO narcissism and corporate tax sheltering. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 38 (1): 1-22
27. Respati, t. 2011. The Influence of Locus of Control on the Relationship of Manager's Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavior Control, and Manager's Intention in Committing Fraud on the Presentation of Financial Statements, Journal of Accounting and Finance in Indonesia. 8: 123-140.
28. Rijsenbilt, A., and H. Commandeur. 2013. Narcissus Enters the Courtroom: CEO Narcissism and Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2). 413–429.
29. Sarker, S., S. Barnes, and R. Reed. 2008. Managerial Ethics, Performance Pressure and Governance: The Case of Misleading Financial Disclosures. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. Anaheim, CA.
30. Sherer,' M., J. Maddux, B. Mercadante, S. Prentice-Dunn,. B. Jacobs, and R. Rogers. 1982. The Self-efficacy Scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51 (2): 663-671.
31. Southard, A., A. Nose, N. Pollock, S. Mercer, and V. Zeigler- Hill. 2015. The interpersonal nature of dark personalities features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34 (7): 555-586.
32. Triantoro, H., I. Utami, and C, Joseph. 2019. Whistleblowing system, Machiavellian personality, fraud intention: An experimental study. Journal of Financial Crime, 27 (1): 202- 216.
33. Welch, J., 2013. The Importance of Self-Efficacy in Ethics Education for Business Undergraduates, Southern Journal of Business & Ethics. 5:214-223.
34. Wen, Z., H. Gu, and X. Fan. 2017. Structural validity of the Machiavellian Personality Scale: A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 105 : 116-123.
35. Widiyanti, A., and M. Sayputri. 2019. Effect of Budget Participation on Managerial Performance with Organizational Committees and Locus of Control as Moderating Variables. Journal of Accounting and Finance,22:136- 146 .
36. Zeigler- Hill,V., and D. Marcus. 2016. The dark side of personality: science and practice in social, personality, and psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association, 389.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezazadeh F, Rezaei F, Hamidi N. The Effect of Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, and Dark Personality Trait on Fraudulent Fiinancial Reporting. aapc 2021; 5 (10) :167-131
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645