[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 5(10): 319-349 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the effect of Professional Ethics and Personal Moral Philosophy on Auditors' Fraud Detection Capability according to moderating role of Professional Skepticism
Mohammad Pashaei Fashtali1 , Keihan Azadi Hir 2, Mohamadreza Vatanparast3
1- Ph.D. Student of accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran(Mohamadpashei67@gmail.com)
2- Assistant Professor,Faculty of Accounting and Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran(Corresponding Author) , ka.cpa2012@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Accounting and Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran(Vatanparast@iaurasht.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (5444 Views)
Recent years studies show that external auditing occupies a low position (eighth place) among the methods of detecting fraud; as a result, it is important to examine which factors can improve external auditorschr('39') performance in detecting fraud. Therefore, the goal of this research is to study the effect of professional ethics and personal moral philosophy (subjective norm) and professional skepticism (attitude towards behavior) on external auditorschr('39') performance fraud detecting based on theory of planned behavior. This research is categorized as an applied one. Studying literature review, research data have been collected by a questionnaire. The statistical sample using cluster sampling method includes 159 private and public sector auditors and research period is dated during 2020. Data analyzing utilized by partial least squares (PLS) through Smart-PLS2 software. The results show that professional ethics and the ethical orientation of idealism have positive direct and indirect effect on the Fraud Detection Capability through mediator variable of professional skepticism. Moreover, ethical orientation of relativism has direct negative effect on fraud detecting capability; besides ethical orientation of relativism has indirect effect on fraud detecting capability through mediator variable of professional skepticism.
Keywords: Fraud Detection Capability, Professional Ethics, Personal Moral Philosophy, Professional Skepticism, Theory of Planned Behavior
Full-Text [PDF 399 kb]   (1237 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/12/5 | Accepted: 2021/01/25 | Published: 2021/03/24
References
1. Accounting, 11: 1-29
2. Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections, Psychology & Health, 26(9): 1113-1127
3. Al Momani, M. A., and M. I. Obeidat. 2013. The effect of auditors' ethics on their detection of creative accounting practices: A field study. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(13):118-136.
4. Albrecht, W. S., G. W. Wernz, and T. L. Williams. 1995. Fraud: Bringing light to the dark side of business. Irwin Professional Pub.
5. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 1997. Due professional care in the performance of work. SAS No. 1, AU Section 230, NY: AICPA.
6. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. 2002. SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. New York, NY: AICPA.
7. Anofe, A.O.; I. Ukpebor and N. Ogbomo. (2015). The effect of Accounting Ethics in Improving Auditor Professional Skepticism, International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 1(2): 1-16.
8. Arifuddin, R. H., and A. Indrijawati. 2020. Auditor Experience, Work Load, Personality Type, and Professional Auditor Skepticism Against Auditors' Ability In Detecting Fraud. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 12(2): 1878-1890.‌
9. Arumega Zarefar. (2016). Paper of the Influence of Ethics ,Experience and
10. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). 2018. Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud Study.
11. Bologna, G. J., and R. J. Lindquist. 1995. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting: New Tools and Techniques. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2nd ed.
12. Braun, R. L. (2000). The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3):243-259.
13. Brown, J. O., J. Hays, and M. T. Stuebs. 2016. Modeling accountant whistleblowing intentions: applying the theory of planned behavior and the fraud triangle, Accounting and the Public Interest, 16 (1): 28-56.
14. Carthy, I. N. 1997. Professional Ethics Code Conflict Situations: Ethical and Value Orientation of Collegiate Accounting Students. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1467–1473.
15. Cavusoglu, K., and Angaykutluk, F. 2020. The effect of professional skepticism and ethics on the ability to detect creative accounting. Prestige International Journal of Management & IT-Sanchayan, 9(1), 70-91.
16. DeZoort F. T. and P.D. Harrison. 2008. An Evaluation of Internal Auditor Responsibility for Fraud Detection. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.
17. Farag, M. S., and R. Z. Elias. 2012. The Impact of Accounting Students’ Professional Skepticism on Their Ethical Perception of Earnings Management. Research on Professional Responsibility & Ethics in Accounting, 16: 185–200.
18. Fernando M. and R. Chowdhury. (2010). The relationship between spiritual well-being and ethical orientations in decision making: an empirical study with business executives in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics; 95(2): 211–225.
19. Fullerton, R., and C. Durtschi. 2004. The effect of professional skepticism on the fraud detection skills of internal auditors. Available at SSRN 617062.
20. Fussaro, P. C., and R. M. Miller. 2002. What Went Wrong At Enron: Everyone’s Guide to the Largest Bankruptcy in U.S. History. NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
21. Gibson, J. L., J. M. Ivancevich, J. H. Donelly, and R. Konopaske. 2012. Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes, 14th edition. NY: McGraw-Hill.
22. Greenfield A., C. Norman, and B. Wier. 2008. The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earnings management behavior. Journal of Business Ethics; 83(3): 419–34.
23. Hsu, C. S., F. H. Kung., and K. James. (2013). An investigation of auditors' responsibility for fraud detection in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(1): 30-47
24. Hulland, J. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20 (2): 195-204.
25. Hunt S., and S. Vitell. 1986. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing; 6(1): 5–16.
26. Hurtt, R. K. 2010. Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1): 149-171.
27. International Auditing & Assurance Standards Board. 2014. Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, & Related Services Pronouncements, 2014 edition, vol.1. NY: International Federations of Accountants.
28. Johari R., Z. Mohd Sanusi, R. Abdul Rahman, and N. Omar. 2013. Auditors’ independence, experience and ethical judgments: the case of Malaysia. Journal of Business and Public Policy; 8(1): 100–19.
29. Johari R., Z. Mohd Sanusi, and C. Vincent. 2017. Effects of auditors’ ethical orientation and self interest independence threat on the mediating role of moral intensity and ethical decision-making process. International Journal of Auditing; 21(32): 38-58.
30. Kung, F.H., and C. L. Huang. 2013. Auditors’ Moral Philosophies & Ethical Beliefs. Management Decision, 51 (3): 479 – 500.
31. Lisic L.L., S.D. Silveri, Y. Song, and K. Wang. 2014. Accounting fraud, auditing, and the role of government sanctions in China. JBR-08209; No of Pages 10)2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.(
32. Marques P. and J. Azevedo-Pereira. (2009). Ethical ideology and ethical judgments in the Portuguese accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics; 86(2): 212–227.
33. Matsumura, E. M., and R. R. Tucker. (1992). Fraud detection: A theoretical foundation. Accounting Review, 67(4): 753-782.
34. Nasution, H., and D. Fitriany. 2012. Effect of Workload, Audit Experience and Personality Type on Professional Skepticism and Auditor's Ability to Detect Fraud. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 3(1): 1235-1249.
35. Okpianti, C. N. 2016. The Influence of Auditor’s Experience, Ethic of Profession and Personality toward Auditor’s Professional Skepticism & Auditor’s Capability on Fraud Detection (Empirical Study on Public Accountant Office in Yogyakarta.
36. Pawitra, D. A. K., and Suhartini, D. 2019. The influence of individual behavioral aspects toward audit judg-ment: the mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(2): 264-273.
37. Perceptions of Management’s Competence and Integrity, Advances in
38. Pierce, B. and B. Sweeney. (2006). Perceived adverse consequences of quality threatening behaviour in audit firms. International journal of auditing, 10(1): 19-39.
39. Pincus K.V. 1989. Financial auditing and fraud detection: Implications for scientific data audit, Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 1:1: 53-70.
40. Ponemon, L. A,(1993)," The Influence of Ethical Reasoning on Auditor/s
41. Pramana, A. C., G. Irianto, and G. Nurkholis. 2016. The Influence Of Professional Skepticism, Experience and Auditors Independence On The Ability To Detect Fraud. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2 (11): 1438-1447.
42. Pramitasari, A. P., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Djamhuri, A. 2017. The influence of auditor’s personality types, experience, ethics, and gender on fraud detection capability: Study of Big Four public accounting firm in Indonesia. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3(7): 640-653.
43. Rahnamay Roodpooshti F., H. Nikoomaram, A. Mahfoozi. 2012. Machiavellianism and ccountants ethical approach: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research; 2(10): 10576- 10581.
44. Schlenker, B. R., and D. R. Forsyth. 1977. On the Ethics of Psychological Research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4: 369-396.
45. Shaub, M. K. (1989). An empirical examination of the determinants of auditors' ethical sensitivity (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University).
46. Shaub, M. K., and J.E. Lawrence. (1996). Ethics, experience and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8: 124-157.
47. Siewa, C.S., Z. Chin-Cheal, M. khamar tazilah, A. Lee-Zhi, H, Tong-Pei, and Y. Vensen-Sarah. 2018. A study on the relationship between professional skepticism characteristics and auditors’ fraud detection in Malaysian context (Doctoral dissertation, UTAR).
48. Singhapakdi A., S. Vitell, and G. Franke. 1999. Antecedents, consequences and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science; 27(1): 19–36.
49. Sulistiyanti, R., and Y. Yakub. 2020. Can professional skepticism, experience, and training support the ability of internal government supervisors to detect fraud?. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 1(4): 190-196.
50. Suraida, Ida. 2005. Effect of Ethics, Competence, Audit Experience and Audit Risk on Auditor Professional Skepticism and Accuracy in Providing Public Accountant Opinion. Sosiohumaniora. 7(3): 186-202.
51. Whittington, O.R., and K. Pany. 2001. Principles of Auditing and Other Assurance Services, 13th edition. NY: McGraw-Hill.
52. Zarefar, A. 2015. The Influence of Ethics ,Experience and competency toward the Quality of Auditing with Professional Auditor Skepticism as a Moderating Variable .3rd Global Conference on Business and Social Science, 219: 828-832.
53. competency toward the Quality of Auditing with Professional Auditor Skepticism as a Moderating Variable .3rd Global Conference on Business and Social Science 219: 828-832.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pashaei Fashtali M, Azadi Hir K, Vatanparast M. Investigating the effect of Professional Ethics and Personal Moral Philosophy on Auditors' Fraud Detection Capability according to moderating role of Professional Skepticism. aapc 2021; 5 (10) :319-349
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-927-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645