[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 5(10): 385-421 Back to browse issues page
Providing a Model for Exposing Corporate Sustainability and Evaluating the effect of Factors Related to Signaling Theory and Stakeholders on Reporting of this Information
Mozaffar Pourkhani zakeleh bari1 , Azita Jahanshad 2, Farzaneh Heidarpoor3
1- PHD student of accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Iran(mozaffar_pourkhani@yahoo.com)
2- associate professor, Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran(Corresponding Author) , az_jahanshad@yahoo.com
3- associate professor, Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran (fheidarpoor@yahoo.com)
Abstract:   (2041 Views)
Given the expansion of business activities in the world and the potential for sustainability in creating opportunities, the category of sustainability has become one of the first goals of countries and companies. But in Iran, less attention has been paid to this issue. Therefore, the purpose of this study is first to provide a model for disclosing corporate sustainability and then the impact of factors related to signaling theory and stakeholders on corporate sustainability reporting.Therefore, in order to achieve the pattern of corporate sustainability disclosure (qualitative part), purposeful sampling method and Delphi method were used by 28 experts, and to test other hypotheses (quantitative part of the research), 117 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange that were used by the Systematic elimination have been studied in the period 2011-2018. To test the hypotheses, panel regression models were used. Delphi test findings and Kendall coefficient show that according to the experts, out of 169 components studied, 80 components are included in the corporate sustainability disclosure model.Among the factors related to signaling theory, firm performance has a direct impact on the overall corporate sustainability index, disclosure from an economic and environmental point of view. In addition, the percentage of firm sustainability costs has a direct impact on the overall corporate sustainability index, public, environmental and social disclosure. Also, among the factors related to stakeholder theory, government ownership has a direct impact on the overall index and all aspects of corporate sustainability, and board ownership has a direct impact on the overall corporate sustainability index, public, economic and environmental disclosure. The findings of this study show the importance of requiring non-financial information disclosure for legislators and standardizers. The proposed model also improves stakeholder awareness of these aspects
Keywords: Performance, Sustainability Costs, Government Ownership, Ownership of Board Members, Disclosure of Company Sustainability
Full-Text [PDF 368 kb]   (673 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/02/21 | Accepted: 2021/04/18 | Published: 2021/02/19
References
1. Adekoya A. C., C. S. Oboh, and O. R.Oyewumi. 2020. Accountants perception of the factors influencing auditors' ethical behaviour in Nigeria. Heliyon Journal. 6 (2). 163-172.
2. Aktas, R., K. Kayalidere, and M. Kargin. 2017. Corporate sustainability reporting and analysis of sustainability reports in turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance. 5(3): 113-125.
3. Alvareza, I. G., and E. Ortas. 2017. Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures. A quantile regression approach, International Business Review. 26 (2): 337–353.
4. Buallay, A., and J. Al-Ajmi. 2019. The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting. Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research: 1-17.
5. Castelo Branco, M. and L, Lima Rodrigues. 2006. Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks. a legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications. An International Journal 11 (3): 232-248.
6. Clarkson, P. M., Y, Li, G.D. Richardson and F.P. Vasvari. 2011. Does it Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30 (2): 122-144.
7. Clarkson, P.M., Y, Li, G.D. Richardson and F.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure. an empirical analysis. Accounting Organizations and Society 33(4): 303-327.
8. Connelly, B. L., S. T. Certo., R. D.Ireland, and C. R.Reutzel. 2011. Doing well by doing good? Implementing new effective integrated CSR strategy. Journal of Management, 37(1): 39–67.
9. Cordeiro, J. J., and M.Tewari. 2015. Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSD: a Stakeholder Theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 130: 833- 849.
10. Diao, Y. 2013. Min ying Strategy and performance of corporate sustainability in Chinese private sectors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Zhe Jiang Industry and Commerce Univisity.
11. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
12. Freeman, R.E. 2010. Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Frost, G., S. Jones, and P. Lee. 2012. The measurement and reporting of sustainability information within the organization: a case analysis, in Jones, S. and Ratnatunga, J. (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Sustainability Accounting, Assurance and Reporting. Emerald, Bingley, pp: 197-225.
14. Guo, J. L. Sun, and X. Li. 2009. Corporate social responsibility assessment of Chinese corporations. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4): 54- 57.
15. Horisch, J., R.E. Freeman and S. Schaltegger. 2014. Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management. Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organ. Environ. 27: 328-346.
16. Kaspersen, M., and T. R. Johansen. 2016. Changing social and environmental reporting systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 135: 731-749.
17. Kleine, A., M. von, and D. Hauff. 2017. Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: application of the integrative sustainability triangle. J. Bus. Ethics 85: 517-533.
18. Kou, L., C. Yeh, and H. Yu. 2012. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility and environmental management: evidence from China, 19: 273-287.
19. Kraten, M. 2014. Sustainability The Accounting Perspective. March. THE CPA JOURNAL. pp: 11- 14.
20. Kwakye, T.O., E. E. Welbeck, G. M. Y. Owusu, and F. K. Anokye. 2018. Determinants of intention to engage in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting (SAR): the perspective of professional accountants. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 3(1): 1-13. DOI:10.1186/s40991-018-0035-2.
21. Li, Q., W. Luo, Y. Wang, and L. Wu. 2013. Firm performance, corporate ownership and corporate social responsibility disclosure in China. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(2): 159-173.
22. Lys, T., J. P. Naughton, and C. Wang. 2012. Signalling through corporate accountability reporting. Retrieved from: http://www.kellogg.northwestern. edu/Departments/accounting/~/media/2E9B4390202D448C83EE7A7504DC298D.ashx
23. Maas, K., S. Schaltegger, and N. Crutzen. 2016. Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. J. Clean. Prod. 1e12. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.008.
24. Mori, N. 2010. Roles of Stakeholders in Strategic Decision-Making of Microfinance Organizations. International Business & Economics Research Journal. 9(7): 516-544
25. Peng, H. G., 2009. Research on corporate social disclosure in China (Unpublished master’s dissertation), Jilin University, Changchun, China.
26. Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., I. Gallego-Alvarez, and I. M. Garcia-Sanchez. 2009. Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structureeffect, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2): 94-107.
27. Qian, C., X. Gao, and A. Tsang. 2015. Corporate philanthropy, ownership type, and financial transparency. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4): 851-867.
28. Roosa, S.A. 2010. Sustainable Development Handbook, 2nd ed., The Fairmont Press, GA.
29. Saleh, M., N. Zulkifli, and R. Muhamad. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Relation on Institutional Ownership. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25 (0): 591–613.
30. Tilling, M. V. 2004. Some Thoughts on Legitimacy Theory in Social and Environmental Accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 24 (2): 3-7.
31. Weber, M. 2008. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Company- Level Measurement Approach for CSR. European Management Journal 26 (4): 247-61
32. Yang, J. 2011. Shang shi gong si she hui ze ren bao gao pi lu yin su yan jiu [research on the factors influencing listed compaines’ corporate social responsibility report disclosure] (unpublished master’s thesis). South-western University of Finance and Economics, Cheng Du.
33. Yuan, Y. 2009. The Research on information disclosure of corporate social responsibility (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), South-western University of Finance and Economics, Cheng Du.
34. Zhang, J. 2017. Users’ perceptions of the drivers for corporate sustainability disclosures made by Chinese listed companies. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1952.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
pourkhani zakeleh bari M, jahanshad A, Heidarpoor F. Providing a Model for Exposing Corporate Sustainability and Evaluating the effect of Factors Related to Signaling Theory and Stakeholders on Reporting of this Information. aapc 2021; 5 (10) :385-421
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-954-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645