[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Search published articles ::
Showing 1 results for Importance-Performance Analysis

Jafar Babajani, Vajhallah Ghorbanizadeh, Ghasem Bolou, Javad Dost Jabaarian,
Volume 8, Issue 15 (9-2023)
Abstract

Nowadays, fiscal transparency is one of the most important factors of effective public financial management (PFM), which builds trust in the government and forms the basis of a sustainable economy. Moreover, fiscal transparency creates an opportunity for citizens to monitor how public funds are spent and thereby increases government accountability. The main goal of the current research was to assess the current state of fiscal transparency in the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and provide solutions to improve it. In this research, first, different dimensions, indexes, and indicators of fiscal transparency were identified which amassed to 101 indicators, 25 indexes and five dimensions of budget preparation and formulation, budget approval, budget execution, auditing and monitoring, and contextual factors. The method of the present research is a mixed approach (qualitative-quantitative).  In the qualitative part, the performance status of each indicator was evaluated using the fuzzy Delphi method and by surveying 112 experts  in 2023, including managers and experts of the Plan and budget organization, experts of the islamic parliament research center, managers and auditors of the ministry of economic Affairs and Finance, and senior auditors of the supreme audit court Then, the difference between the current and desired state was determined using the importance-performance analysis. The results of the importance-performance analysis show that all 101 indicators of the research are important and the performance status of the majority of fiscal transparency indicators is in the weak range (100 indicators) with only one indicator(Public publication of the budgetary comparison report by the Supreme Audit Court) being in the acceptable range.


Page 1 from 1     

دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.26 seconds with 25 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666