|
1. Annisette, M., Cooper, C., and Gendron, Y. 2015. Living in a contradictory world: CPA’s admission to SSCI. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 31: 1–4 2. Baldvinsdottir, G., Mitchell, F., and Norreklit, H. 2010. Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting. Management Accounting Research 21(2): 79–82. 3. Baxter, W. T. 1988. Accounting research: Academic trends versus practical needs. ICAS. 4. Beattie, V. 2014. Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review 46 (2): 111-134. 5. Broad, W. J. 1981. The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science 211 (4487): 1137–1139. 6. Broadbent, J. 2016. The “real” impact factor: Reflections on the impact of the research excellence framework. Financial Reporting 1: 15–28. 7. Broadbent, J., and Unerman, J. 2011. Developing the relevance of the accounting academy. Meditari Accountancy Research 19 (1/2): 7–21. 8. Brownson, R. C., Kreuter, M. W., Arrington, B. A., and True, W. R. 2006. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: How can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Reports 121 (1): 97–103. 9. Burton, F., Heninger, W., Summers, S., and Wood, D. 2024. Perceptions of accounting academics on the review and publication process: An update and commentary. Issues in Accounting Education 39 (1): 29–45. 10. Chow, C. W., and Harrison, P.D. 2002. Identifying meaningful and significant topics for research and publication: A sharing of experiences and insights by ‘influential’ accounting authors. Journal of Accounting Education 20 (3): 183–203. 11. Conrath-Hargreaves, A., and Wüstemann, S. 2019. Multiple institutional logics and their impact on accounting in higher education: The case of a German foundation university. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 32 (3): 782–810. 12. Czyzewski, A. B., and Dickinson, H. D. 1990. Factors leading to the rejection of accountants’ manuscripts. Journal of Accounting Education 8 (1): 93–104. 13. Gautam, K. 2008. Addressing the research-practice gap in healthcare management. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 14 (2): 155–159. 14. Gendron, Y. 2015. Accounting academia and the threat of the paying-off mentality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 168–176. 15. Grossi, G., Dobija, D., and Strzelczyk, W. 2020. The impact of competing institutional pressures and logics on the use of performance measurement in hybrid universities. Public Performance and Management Review 43 (4): 818–844. 16. Guthrie, J., and Parker, L. D. 2014. The global accounting academic: What counts! Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 27 (1): 2–14. 17. Hopwood, A. G. 2007. Whither accounting research? The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1365–1374. 18. Humphrey, C., and Gendron, Y. 2015. What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 47–66. 19. Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., and Grossi, G. 2017. Performance measurement in universities: Ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators. Public Money and Management.37 (4): 293–300. 20. Kline, R. B. 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York. Guilford Press. 21. Leisenring, J., and Johnson, L. 1994. Accounting research: On the relevance of research to practice. Accounting Horizons 8 (4): 74–79. 22. Malsch, B., and Tessier, S. 2015. Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 84–98. 23. Moizer, P. 2009. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (2): 285–304. 24. Moizer, P. 2009. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game?, Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (2): 285-304. 25. Musa Yelwa, A., Sunusi Sa‟ad, A., Nasiru Abdul salam, K., and Mohammed, A. B. 2016. Research Methodology in Accounting Research. Journal of Research & Method in Education 6 (4): 30–37. 26. Nicolo, G., Manes-Rossi, F., Christiaens, J., and Aversano, N. 2020. Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities. Journal of Management and Governance 24: 1055- 1087. 27. Nutley, S., and Davies, H. 2000. Making a reality of evidence-based practice: some lessons from the diffusion of innovations. Public Money and Management 20 (4): 35-42. 28. Otley, D. 2010. Research assessment in the UK: An overview of 1992–2008. Australian Accounting Review 20 (1): 3–13. 29. Palea, V. 2017. Whither accounting research? A European view. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 42: 59–73. 30. Pelger, C., and Grottke, M. 2015. What about the future of the academy?—Some remarks on the looming colonisation of doctoral education. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 117–129. 31. Pilonato, S., and Monfardini, P. 2022. Managerial reforms, institutional complexity and individuals: An empirical analysis of higher education. Journal of Management and Governance 26 (2): 365–387. 32. Ramassa, P., Avallone, F., and Quagli, A. 2024. Can “publishing game” pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management and Governance 27 (1): 1- 36. 33. Rebora, G., and Turri, M. 2013. The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face. Research Policy 42 (9): 1657–1666. 34. Rogers, R. E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. 35. Salicru،S. 2005. Innovation: Myths and Realities. Available at: http//www.appliedinnovation.com.au 36. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A. 2016. Research Methods for Business Students. England: Pearson Education Limited. 37. Singleton-Green, B. 2010. The communication gap: Why doesn’t accounting research make a greater contribution to debates on accounting policy? Accounting in Europe 7 (2): 129–145. 38. Stefaniak, J., Baaki, J., Hoard, B., and Stapleton, L. (2018). The influence of perceived constraints during needs assessment on design conjecture, Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 (1): 55- 71. 39. Tourish, D., and Willmott, H. 2015. In defiance of folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 37–46. 40. Tucker, B. P., and Schaltegger, S. 2016. Comparing the research-practice gap in management accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 29 (3): 362–400. 41. Tucker, B., and Parker, L. 2014. In our ivory towers? The research-practice gap in management accounting: An academic perspective. Accounting and Business Research 44 (2): 104–143. 42. Turri, M. 2014. The new Italian agency for the evaluation of the university system (ANVUR): A need for governance or legitimacy? Quality in Higher Education 20 (1): 64–82. 43. Unerman, J. 2020. Risks from self-referential peer review echo chambers developing in research fields. British Accounting Review 52: 100910. 44. Wood, D. A. 2016. Comparing the publication process in accounting, economics, finance, management, marketing, psychology, and the natural sciences. Accounting Horizons 30 (3): 341–361. 45. Zeff, S. A. 1989. Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA: Some implications for UK academics. The British Accounting Review 21 (2): 159–176. 46. van Helden, J. 2019. The practical relevance of public sector accounting research; time to take a stand. Public Money and Management 39 (8): 595–598. 47. van Helden, J., and Argento, D. 2020. Our hate–love relationship with publication metrics. Public Money and Management 40 (2): 174–177.
|
