Key Themes of Ambiguity, Duplicity, and Role Conflict in the Impairment of Internal Audit Independence: A Thematic Analysis

khanmohammadi, mohammad; moradi, mohammad; Nargesian, abbas

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Editorial Board

Articles archive

Publication Ethics

For Authors

Peer Review Process

Registration

Site Facilities

Contact us

Search in website

Receive site information

Back to the articles list

Back to browse issues page

Key Themes of Ambiguity, Duplicity, and Role Conflict in the Impairment of Internal Audit Independence: A Thematic Analysis

Mohammad Khanmohammadi¹

, Mohammad Moradi²

, Abbas Nargesian³

1- Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Accounting, College of Management, Alborz Campus, University of Tehran, tehran, Iran, khanmohammadi60@gmail.com
2- Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, (Corresponding Author) , moradimt@ut.ac.ir
3- Associate Prof, Department of Leadership and Human Capital, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, anargesian@ut.ac.ir

Abstract: (39 Views)

This study aims to uncover and analyze the latent and complex obstacles that impair internal audit independence. By identifying key themes related to ambiguity, duplicity, and role conflict, it proposes practical solutions to strengthen this independence and enhance corporate governance. Employing a qualitative approach and thematic analysis method, the research collected data through semi-structured interviews with 20 employees from the internal audit units of a private banking financial group, using a convenience sampling method in 2024. The findings indicate that internal audit independence is compromised by three primary challenges: ambiguity, duplicity, and role conflict. Ambiguity in the corporate governance structure and the positioning of the internal audit function, coupled with a lack of clear standards, results in weakened board support and confusion regarding the unit's responsibilities. The duplicity faced by internal auditors—torn between organizational affiliation and professional duty, as well as between professional integrity and organizational expediency—poses significant threats to their independence. Furthermore, conflicts arising from organizational pressures on professional ethics, and the tension between the roles of independent overseer and internal consultant, create additional complexity. Overall, these findings suggest that addressing these challenges requires redefining corporate governance frameworks, developing and implementing explicit professional standards, and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability within organizations. The insights from this study can serve as a foundation for regulatory reform, the promotion of professional standards, and enhanced oversight in the field of internal audit in Iran, thereby playing a crucial role in improving financial transparency and combating corruption

Keywords: : Internal audit, professional independence, role ambiguity, role duality, role conflict

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/06/3 | Accepted: 2025/10/15

References

1. Abbott, L. J., B. Daugherty, S.Parker, and J. F. Peters. 2019. Internal Audit Quality and Financial Reporting Quality: The Joint Importance of Independence and Competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1): 3–40.

2. Afrizal, F., and W. Handayani. 2023. Eksplorasi Dilema Independensi: Studi Fenomenologi Auditor Internal Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(1): 69-86.

3. Ahmad, Z., and D. Taylor. 2009. Commitment to Independence by Internal Auditors: The Effects of Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(9): 899-925.

4. Allegrini, M., G. D’Onza, L.Paape, R. Melville, and G.Sarens. 2006. The European Literature Review on Internal Auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(8): 845-853.

5. Alzeban, A., and D. Gwilliam. 2014. Factors Affecting the Internal Audit Effectiveness: A Survey of the Saudi Public Sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2) : 74-86.

7. Arena, M., and G.Azzone.2009. Identifying Organizational Drivers of Internal Audit Effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 13(1) : 43-60.

8. Arena, M., and K. K. Jeppesen.2010. The Juridification of Corporate Governance and the Potential for Internal Audit as a Governance Tool. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(1) : 80-99.

9. Bazmi, N. A., M. Rehman, C. A.Rehman, , and N. A. Bazmi. 2016. Issues and Challenges Faced by Internal Auditors of Private Sector Organizations.

10. Braun, V., and V.Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2) : 77-101.‌

11. Cohen, A., and G. Sayag.2010. The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirical Examination of Its Determinants in Israeli Organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 20(3) : 296-307.

12. Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M.Wright.2002. Corporate Governance and the Audit Process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4) : 573-594.

13. Dissa, A. 2013. Role theory in organizational behavior. Routledge.

14. Eklöv Alander, G. 2023. Internal Auditor Independence as a Situated Practice: Four Archetypes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 36(9) : 108-134.

15. Foster, R. C., and T. F. O’Connor.2014. Seven Barriers to Performance Auditing in Canadian Cities. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (IIARF).

16. Goodwin, J., and T. Y. Yeo.2001. Two Factors Affecting Internal Audit Independence and Objectivity: Evidence from Singapore. International Journal of Auditing, 5(2) : 107–125.

17. Graham, J. R., C. R.Harvey , and S.Rajgopal. 2016. Value Destruction and Financial Reporting Decisions. The Accounting Review, 91(1) : 1-23.

18. Hanson, G. C., L. B. Hammer, and C. L. Colton. 2006. Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of occupational health psychology, 11(3):249-265.

19. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2013. ISA 610 (Revised March 2013), Using the work of internal auditors. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

20. James, K. 2003. The Effects of Internal Audit Structure on Perceived Financial Fraud Prevention Statement. Accounting Horizons, 17(4) : 315-327.

21. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling.1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4) : 305-360.

22. Kahn, R. L. 1964. Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.

23. Kamau, G. C., S. N. Kariuki, and A. N. Mutiso. 2014. Exploring Internal Auditor Independence Motivators: Kenyan Perspective.

24. Knechel, W. R., C.van Staden, , and L. Sun, 2013. The Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Auditing, 17(1) : 1-12.

25. Larson, L. L. 2004. Internal auditors and job stress. Managerial AuditingJournal, 19(9) : 1119-1130.

26. Messier, W. F., S. M.Glover, and D. F. Prawitt. 2019. Auditing and Assurance Services: ASystematic Approach (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

27. Mihret, D. G., and A. W. Yismaw.2007. Internal Audit Effectiveness: An Ethiopian Public Sector Case Study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5) : 470-484.

28. NCA Self-Study Committee. 2020. International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.

29. Roussy, M. 2015. Internal Auditors’ Roles: From Watchdogs to Helpers and Protectors of the Top Manager. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29: 1-14.

30. Saputra, I. G., and A.Yusuf. 2019. The Role of Internal Audit in Corporate Governance and Contribution to Determine Audit Fees for External Audits. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(1) : 1-5.

31. Setiawan, N., R.Rohemah, , and I. F. Aulia. 2023. Independence for Internal Auditors: Is it Necessary? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10(2) :25-34.

32. Taha, A. A. 2024. Internal Auditors’ Independence Under Workplace Bullying Stress: An Investigative Study. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(5) : 762-783.

33. Van Peursem, K. A. 2005. Conversations with internal auditors: The power of ambiguity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(5): 489-512.

34. Wang, P., and S.Liang. 2025. Internal audit independence, legal person governance structure, and financial reporting quality. International Review of Economics and Finance:104-142.

Add your comments about this article

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Back to the articles list

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4722