The Evaluation of Inventory Management with Behavioral Approach

Nikbakht, Mohammad Reza; rahmani, ali; Sadr Ara, Mehrdad

doi:10.18869/acadpub.aapc.1.2.97

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Editorial Board

Articles archive

Publication Ethics

For Authors

Peer Review Process

Registration

Site Facilities

Contact us

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2017)

aapc 2017, 1(2): 97-126

Back to browse issues page

The Evaluation of Inventory Management with Behavioral Approach

Mohammad Reza Nikbakht¹

, Ali Rahmani²

, Mehrdad Sadr Ara

1- Associate Professor of accounting, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran (mnikbakht@ut.ac.ir)
2- Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Science and Economics, University of Al-Zahra, Iran (rahmani.ali@gmail.com)
3- PhD of Accounting,Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran (Corresponding author) , Mehrdadsadrara@gmail.com

Abstract: (4916 Views)

The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive model for economic Decision in a laboratory environment with a behavioral approach. This study attempts to evaluate the existing empirical evidence, In a controlled test environment and the attitudes of people towards risk with respect to the timing of payments made to measure and The profitability of models of inventory management in terms of acceptance or avoid risk, on the behavioral approach. This research is in the field of positive research and the method of laboratory research (using a controlled environment).

Payment plans and managers risk preferences is effective on the decision-making process of optimal order level. The research model presented in this study is based on behavioral models based on triple risk preferences and three payment plan in whole nine behavioral models that were compared with classical regression model. The end result of paired sample t test showed that Behavioral models developed in this study is more predictive than the classic model and also the end goal of research is Behavioral model developed in this study leads lower opportunity cost than classical models and also Order level inventory profitability is increased.

Keywords: Risk Preferences, Newsvendor Model, Mental Biases, Behavioral Approach

Full-Text [PDF 464 kb] (1459 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/12/3 | Accepted: 2017/02/19 | Published: 2017/03/19

References

1. Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz K ,.(2006). Behavioral operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management , 24(6),pp:737–752.

2. Bhargava, J. N.(1993). Economics of Information Management; Jampur: Arihant Publishing House, pp: 62-5.

3. Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3),pp:519–538.

4. Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann U (2010) Better decisions? Why experience managers aren’t always right. Internat, Commerce Reveiew. 9(1),pp:49–57.

5. Bonner. S E, Clor-proell. S M, & Koonce L. (2014) Mental accounting and disaggregation based on the sign and relative magnitude of income statement items, The Accounting Review, Vol 89, No. 6, pp:2087-2114.

6. Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor “pull-to center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4), pp:590–608.

7. Chen L, Kok G, & Tong J D. (2013) The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting, Management Science, Vol 59, No. 2, pp: 436-451.

8. Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3) , pp:323–336.

9. Drucker, P,.(1987).

10. Feiler DC, Tong JD, Larrick RP (2012) Biased judgment in censored environments. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1612.

11. Gourville J. & Soman D.(1998). Payment Depreciation: The Behavioral Effects of Temporally Separating Payments From Consume Piton, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol (25),pp:160-174

12. Heath C. & Soll J.,( 1996).Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions, Journal of Consumer Research23, pp:40-52

13. Ho T-H, Lim N, Cui TT (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11),PP:1891–1910.

14. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.

15. Kremer M, Minner S, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):673–681.

16. Lim, S. S.,(2006). Do Investors Integrate Losses and Segregate Gains? Mental Accounting and Investor Trading Decisions, Journal of Business, Vol. 79, PP: 2539-2574.

17. Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2), PP:315–329.

18. Newell, Allen, & Herbert A.(1972). Simon; Human Problem Solving; New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, PP: 34-5.

19. Prelect D.& Lowenshtain G.,(1998). The Red And The Black: Mental Accounting of Sowings & Debt, Marketing Science 17 , pp.4-28

20. Read, D., Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M. (1999). 'Choice bracketing', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19:1-3PP: 171-197

21. Robbins, Stephen, P; Managing Today; New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000, P. 69.

22. Schweitzer ME, Cachon GP,. (2000). Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3),PP:404–420.

23. Shafir E, Thaler RH (2006) Invest now, drink later, spend never: On the mental accounting of delayed consumption. J. Econom. Psych. 27(5),PP:694–712.

24. Simon, Herbert (1991).Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning, Organization Science, 2 (1),PP: 125–134.

25. Simon, Herbert A. (1987).

26. Simon, Herbert H.(1980).

27. Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.

28. Thaler RH., (1999). Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3),pp:183–206.

29. Thaler, R,.( 1990). Anomalies:Saving, Fungibility, and Mental Accounts, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.4, No.1, PP: 193-205

30. Thaler, Richard H., 1999. Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3),PP: 183–206.

31. Tversky D, Kahneman, D,. (1981) .The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481),PP:453–458.

32. White, A & Censlive, M, (2016). Inventory Control Systems Model for Strategic Capacity Acquisition, Journal of Industrial Engineering Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1650863, 16 pages , available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1650863

33. White, A & Censlive, M, (2016). Inventory Control Systems Model for Strategic Capacity Acquisition, Journal of Industrial Engineering Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1650863, 16 pages , available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1650863

34. Woodman, R. W.; J. e. Sawyer, & R. W. Griffin,.( 1993).Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.18869/acadpub.aapc.1.2.97

‎ 20.1001.1.24767166.1395.1.2.5.5

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Nikbakht M R, rahmani A, Sadr Ara M. The Evaluation of Inventory Management with Behavioral Approach. aapc 2017; 1 (2) :97-126
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-144-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2017)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645