[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 6(11): 159-186 Back to browse issues page
Model of Mind Mapping to Compilation of Audit Report
Alireza Leissi1 , Aliakbar Nonahal nahr Dr 2, Heydar Mohammadzadeh Salteh3 , Mahdi Zeynali4
1- PhD Candidate of Azad University of Marand Unit, Marnd, Iran (alirezaleissi@gmail.com)
2- Assistant Professor, Accounting Department, Bostanabad Azad University, Bostanabad,Iran(Corresponding Author) , anonahal@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor; Azad University of Marand Unit, Marnd, Iran (salteh2008@gmail.com)
4- Assistant Professor, Accounting Department, Tabriz Azad University, Tabriz,Iran (dr.zeynali@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (2716 Views)
Auditing is a judgmental process that requires the professional judgments of auditors in both the performance and reporting stages. Psychological theories (dual code theory and load theory) state that visual information can make better judgments and decisions than its linear functions (states) by stimulating the nonlinear functions of the human brain. Thus, in the present study, the mental mapping model based on the above-mentioned psychological theories has been analyze to compile the audit report using statistical tests such as binomial test, t-test, Kolmogorov test and Friedman test. In order to design a mind mapping model, 53 independent auditors and academic experts were surveyed in 2020 to first extract data related to the main factors influencing reporting and then to use it to develop and design a mind mapping model. The model of mind map extracted and compiled in the present study can be use as an effective tool in compiling the auditor's report as a desirable and reliable adjustment of the audit report.
Keywords: Professional Judgment, Cognitive load theory, Dual-Coding theory, Mind Mapping, Linear and Nonlinear Brain Functions, Nonlinear Judgments.
Full-Text [PDF 478 kb]   (416 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/03/10 | Accepted: 2021/05/23 | Published: 2021/08/23
References
1. Aini, Q and E.P. Harahap, and F. Faradilla. 2020, the Effects of Sales Reports Business Intelligence on Employee Performance, ATM, 4(1): 83-91.
2. Al-Jarf. Reima ,2021. Teaching Reading to EFL Freshman Students with Mind Mapping Software, journal for research school and professionals of English learning,5(24), pp 1-12.
3. Asbahr.K and K. Ruhnke .2019. Real effects of reporting key audit matters on auditors' judgment and choice of action, International Journal of Auditing,23(2): 165-180.
4. Awati J. S and S.S. Desai, S. Tope. 2020. Mind Mapping: An Effective Teaching Learning Evaluation Tool in Engineering Education, journal of engineering education transformations, 33(1): 78-83.
5. Brunelli.R, 2009. Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice, Wiley.
6. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1995. Professional Judgment and the Auditor, CICA Research Study Group, Toronto, CICA.
7. Cejka.P, and H. Mohelska. 2020. National Culture Influence on Organisational Trauma: A Conceptual Framework Review, Information Resources Management Association (USA).
8. Corbin, J. & A. Strauss, 2008. Basics of Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Qualitative Research.
9. Curry, A. 2020 Management Accounting Above and Under Ground, doctoral thesis, Printed by Luleå University of Technology, Graphic Production.
10. Deborah.R. I, and A. smart and R.N. White, and M. Mitchell, and T. Gebru, and B. Hutchinson, and J. Smith-Loud, and D. Theron, and P. Barnes, 2020, Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing, (Fariness, Accountability and Transparency) conference: 33-44.
11. Gossack-Keenan.K, and Wit.K, and Gardiner, E, M. Turcotte, and T. Chan, 2020. Showing Your Thinking: Using Mind Maps to Understand the Gaps Between Experienced Emergency Physicians and Their Students, Journal of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 4(1): 54-63.
12. Guilford, J.P,1967. The nature of human intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1): 3-14.
13. Hosseini, S. H. 2021 The Effect of Baseline Performance and Age on Cognitive Training Improvements in Older Adults: A Qualitative Review jpad-journal of prevention of alzheimers disease:100-109.
14. Husáková.M and B. Vladimír. 2020, Formal Ontologies in Information Systems Development: A Systematic Review, Information, 11(66) 1-18.
15. Jaillot.V, and M. Istasse, and S. Servigne, and G. Gesquière, and M. Rautenberg, and I. Lefort 2020, Describing, comparing and analysing digital urban heritage tools: A methodology designed with a multidisciplinary approach, Journal Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 17: 1-30.
16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
17. Mališ, S. S and L. Žager and Mateja. 2021. The Future of Audit in Light of Technological Changes: Opportunities and Threats, Fostering Innovation and Competitiveness with FinTech, RegTech, and SupTech: 228-249.
18. Merriam, S.B. 1988. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francis-co, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 36(10): 962-962.
19. Saparuddin.S, and A. Nasirwan. 2020, Improving Quality of Learning with Syariah Accounting Mind Mapping Method in Accounting Program at Universitas Negeri Medan, Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah (ekuitas), 1(2): 120-125.
20. Sarbadhikari.SN and K Chakrabarty .2001. Chaos in the brain: a short review alluding to epilepsy, depression, exercise and lateralization, Medical engineering & physics 23 (7): 447-457.
21. Solihat, A 2020, Mind Map Research of 5 Years: Financial Modeling and Pro Forma Analysis, Business Innovation & Entrepreneurship Journal, e-ISSN: 2684-8945, 2(1): 1-8.
22. Valentim, C and E. Cornachione and A. Rocha and F. Rocha. 2017, Cognitive brain mapping of auditors and accountants in going concern judgments, Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28 (73): 132-147.
23. Wang.M and B. Cong and Z. Zhao and Z. Su and Y. Tian.2020. Spherical NiCo2O4/CuS composites for supercapacitor electrodes, Materials Letters, 264: 1-5.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

leissi A, nonahal nahr A, Mohammadzadeh Salteh H, Zeynali M. Model of Mind Mapping to Compilation of Audit Report. aapc 2021; 6 (11) :159-186
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-963-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645