[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) ::
journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting 2021, 6(11): 41-66 Back to browse issues page
Relationship between the Self-Interest Threat and ethical sensitivity, the role of mediating of moral intensity
Asghar Asadiyan owghani1, Zohreh Hajiha 2, Ramzan Ali Royaee3, Hamidreza Vakilifard4
1- Ph.D Student, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch(as.asadiyan@gmail.com)
2- Associate Professor in accounting, Islamic Azad University, East Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran(corresponding author) , drzhajiha@gmail.com
3- Associate professor in accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran(ad_royaee@yahoo.com)
4- Associate professor in accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran (H-vakilifard@srbiau.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (8411 Views)

The threat of self-interest as an environmental factor can affect the ethical decision-making process of auditors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the threat of self- interest on ethical sensitivity, with an emphasis on the role of mediator of the ethical severity of auditors. This research is a quasi experimental study and the statistical population of the study includes auditors working in private audit firms in 2018, of which 186 were selected as sample volumes. The research data were collected through a questionnaire and analyzed using the structural equation modeling using PLS software. Findings show that the threat of self- interest has a positive and significant effect on ethical sensitivity, and this effect is exacerbated by the variable of moral intensity. Therefore, based on the theory of social cognition, it can be argued that the existence of a Self-Interest  Threat due to fears that poses the negative consequences of these threats to auditors can increase the ethical sensitivity and moral intensity of auditors to ethical issues.

Keywords: ethical sensitivity, moral intensity, Self-Interest Threat, ethical decision-making process.
Full-Text [PDF 269 kb]   (131 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/11/2 | Accepted: 2019/02/15 | Published: 2021/08/23
References
1. Bandura, A. , (1986). ‘The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory’, Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4(3): 359–73.
2. Barnett, T. and Valentine, S., (2004). Issue contingencies and marketers recognition of ethical issues, ethical judgments and behavioral intentions , Journal of Business Research, 57( 4): 338–46.
3. Barrainkua, I. and Espinosa-Pike, M. , (2015). ‘New insights into under reporting of time: the audit partner context’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4): 94– 514.
4. Bartlett, R. W. (1993). ‘A heretical challenge to the incantations of audit independence’, Accounting Horizons,5(1): 11–16.
5. Chung, H. and Kallapur, S. , (2003). ‘Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals’, The Accounting Review, 78(4): 931–55.
6. Cianci, A. M. & Bierstaker, J. L,. (2009). ‘The effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors’ self- and public-focused ethical judgments’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(5): 455–74.
7. Cohen J. R. and Bennie N. M. , (2006). The applicability of a contingent factors model to accounting ethics research, Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1): 1–18.
8. Combel. T & Hoghton. (2005). Ethics & Auditing. ANU E Press.
9. DeAngelo, L. E. , (1981). ‘Auditor size and audit quality’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3): 183-99.
10. Dickerson ,carol. (2009). Ethical Decision-Making in Public Accounting: Investigating Factors that Influence Auditors' Ethical Sensitivity. california university,phd dissertation
11. Evelyne , R. & Berangere , B. & Romain, C & amina C. (2019). ‘Moral Intensity, Issue Characteristic and Ethical Issue ecognition in Sales Situations’, Journal of Business Ethics Forthcoming , 154(4): 1–47.
12. Farmer, T., Rittenberg, L. and Trompeter, G. , (1987). ‘An investigation of the impact of economic and organization factors in auditor independence’, Auditing, A Journal of Practice and Theory, 7(1): 1–14.
13. Forsyth, D. R. , (1980). ‘A taxonomy of ethical ideologies’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1): 175–84.
14. Hunt,A.K. and Lulseged,A. , (2007). ‘Client importance and non- Big 5 auditors’ reporting decisions’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(2): 212–48.
15. IFAC, Handbook of Code of Ethics for Professio Accountants Handbook. pdf (Accessed February 2013), 2012
16. Johari, R. J., Mohd. Sanusi, Z and Vincent K. Chong. , (2017). ’Effects of Auditors’Ethical Orientation and Self-Interest Independence Threat on the Mediating Role of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making Process’International Journal of Auditing, 21(32): 38-58
17. Johari, R. J., Mohd. Sanusi, Z., Abdul Rahman, R. and Omar, N. (2013). ‘Auditors’ independence, experience and ethical judgments: the case of Malaysia’, Journal of Business and Public Policy, Vol. 8(1): 100–19.
18. Jones, T. M. , (1991). ‘Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model’, Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 366–95.
19. Li, C. , (2009). ‘Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence fromgoing-concernopinions’, ontemporaryccounting Research, 26(1): 201–30.
20. Mautz, R. K. and Sharaf, H. A. , (1961). The Philosophy of Auditing, Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
21. Moores, T. T. and Chang, J. C. , (2006). ‘Ethical decisionmaking in software piracy: initial development and test of a fourcomponentmodel’, MIS Quarterly, 30(1): 167–80.
22. Nasution D., (2013). Essays on Auditor Independence, Accounting School of Business & Economics Åbo Akademi University, ISBN: 978-952-12-2912-1,
23. Nelson, M., Elliott, J. and Tarpley, R. , (2002). ‘Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions’, The Accounting Review, 77: 175–203.
24. Oxner m. marta. , (2006). Is ethical judgment a dimension of auditor expertise. Edmonton,Alberta, phd Theisis. Edmonton alberta UN.
25. Rest, J. R. , (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, New York: Praeger.
26. Sweeney, B. and Costello, F. , (2009). ‘Moral intensity and ethical decision-making: an empirical examination of undergraduate accounting and business students’, Accounting Education, 18(1): 75–97.
27. Valentine, S. R. & Rittenberg, T. L. , (2007). ‘The ethical decision making of men and women executive in international business situations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2): 125–34.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

asadiyan owghani A, Hajiha Z, royaee R A, Vakilifard H. Relationship between the Self-Interest Threat and ethical sensitivity, the role of mediating of moral intensity. journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2021; 6 (11) :41-66
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-536-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 29 queries by YEKTAWEB 4355