[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) ::
aapc 2022, 7(13): 399-429 Back to browse issues page
Identifying the Factors Affecting the Quality of Investors’ Judgment and Decision-Making Based on Cognitive Psychology
Hassan Farajzadeh dehkordi 1, Yeganeh Faghfour maghrebi2
1- Assistant Professor of accounting، Faculty of financial sciences، Kharazmi University، Tehran، Iran (Corresponding Author) , ha.farajzadeh@yahoo.com
2- phd of accounting, shahid beheshti university,Tehran، Iran(yeganeh.maghrebi@yahoo.com)
Abstract:   (2054 Views)
Investors' decisions affect the allocation of resources in the capital market so it is important to gain knowledge about the mechanism and factors affecting their judgment and decision-making. In the first step, this study, provides an integrated picture of the theories and viwpoints related to the application of cognitive psychology in the field of judgment and decision-making. In the second step of the research, the thematic analysis has been used to investigate the factors affecting the quality of investors' judgment and decision-making from 2006 to 2022 using 40 papers published in international journals. Analysis results related to the factors affecting the quality of investors’ judgment and decision-making show five main themes, including; (1) The usage of qualitative (narrative) information in addition to quantitative information to convey information, (2) Historical course of theories related to judgment and decision-making, (3) Effective factors making differences in the quality of judgment and decision-making, (4) Impact of implicit and integrated feelings and emotions on judgment and decision-making, and (5) Consequences (benefits of paying attention to the factors affecting the quality of judgment and decision-making). The results of this study show that decision and judgment of investors can be affected by the interaction of factors affecting the person, the type of activity (goal) and the environment, and it is necessary to pay attention to each of these factors in order to explain the behavior and judgments of investors.
 
Keywords: Cognitive Psychology, the Quality of Judgment and Decision Making, Thematic Analysis
Full-Text [PDF 298 kb]   (646 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/08/28 | Accepted: 2022/09/22 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Akhtari, M. 2011. Reassessment of the Weather Effect: Stock Prices and Wall Street Weather. Undergraduate Economic Review 7(1): 380-398.
2. Aren.s,. and N. Hamamci. 2020. Relationship Between Risk Aversion, Risky Investment Intention, Investment Choices, Impact of Personality Traits and Emotion. Kybernetes 49(11): 2651-2682.
3. Arikan, O. 2022. The Effect of Boilerplate Language on Nonprofessional Investors’ Judgments. Accounting and Business Research 52(4): 417-442.
4. Asay, S., B. Elliott, and K. Rennekamp. 2017. Disclosure readability and the sensitivity of investors’ valuation judgments to outside information. The Accounting review 92 (4): 1-25.
5. Asay, S., B. Elliott, and K. Rennekamp. 2018. Firm performance, reporting goals and language choices in narrative disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 65(2): 380-398.
6. Asay, S., R. Libby, and K. Rennekamp. 2018. Do features that associate managers with a message magnify investors’ reactions to narrative disclosures?. Accounting, Organizations and Society 68-69: 1-14.
7. Barańczuk, U. 2019. The five factor model of personality and emotion regulation: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 139: 217-227.
8. Bless, H., Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., Golisano, V., Rabe, C., and Wölk, M. 1996. Mood and the use of scripts: Does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(4): 665–679.
9. Bonner, S. 2008. Judgment and Decision-making in Accounting. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
10. Durney, M., J. Smith, and M. J. Wynes. 2022. Connecting the Dots: Helping Investors Use Risk Disclosures When Evaluating Financial Disclosures. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3947286
11. Elkins, H., G. Entwistle., and R. Schmidt. 2019. How Do Opportunistic Disclosures Impact Nonprofessional Investors’ decision-making? Disinhibiting and Inhibiting Mechanisms. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=16389
12. Elliott, W. B., F. Hodge, J. Kennedy and M. Pronk. 2007. Are M.B.A. Students a Good Proxy for Nonprofessional Investors? The Accounting Review 82: 139-168.
13. Elliott, W. B., K. Rennekamp., and B. White. 2018. The Paradoxical Behavioral Effects of a Directional Goal on Investors’ Risk Perceptions and Valuation Judgments. Journal of Behavioral Finance 19(3): 271-290.
14. Elliott, W. B., S. M. Grant, and K. M. Rennekamp. 2017. How disclosure features of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Interact with Investor Numeracy to Influence Investor Judgments? Contemporary Accounting Research 34(3): 1596-1621.
15. Emmet, S. 2019. Investor Reaction to Disclosure of Past Performance and Future Plans. The Accounting Review 94:5:165-188.
16. Epstein, S. 1994. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 49(8): 709-724.
17. Erjavec, J., A. Popovič., and P. Trkman. 2019. The effect of personality traits and knowledge on the quality of decisions in supply chains. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 32(1): 2269-2292.
18. Feldman, R., S. Govindaraj, J. Livant, and B. Segal. 2009. Management's tone change, post earnings announcement drift and accruals. Review of Accounting Studies 15: 915-953.
19. Fiske, S. T., and S. E. Taylor .2008. Social cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Forgas, J. P., N. Y. M. Chan., and S. M. Laham. 2001. Affect Influences on Thinking and Behavior: Implications for Clinical, Applied and Preventive Psychology. Journal of Applied and Preventive Psychology 10 (4): 225-242.
21. Griffith, E., K. Kadous., and D. Young. 2021. Improving Complex Audit Judgments: A Framework and Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(3): 2071-2104.
22. Hales, J., J. Kuang, and S. Venkataraman. 2011. Who Believes the Hype?. An Experimental Examination of How Language Affects Investor Judgments, Journal of Accounting Research 49: 223-255.
23. Han, J., and H. T. Tan. 2010. Investors' Reaction to Management Earnings Guidance: The Joint Effect of Investment Position, News Valence, and Guidance Form. Journal of Accounting Research 48: 81-104.
24. Henry, E. 2008. Are Investors Influenced by the Way Earnings Press Releases Are Written? Journal of Business Communication 45: 363-408
25. Huang, X., S. H. Teoh, and Y. L. Zhang. 2014. Tone Management. The Accounting Review 89: 1083-1113.
26. Huntsinger, J. R. 2012. Does positive affect broaden and negative affect narrow attentional scope? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Experimental Psychology 141: 595-600.
27. Hustinger, J. R., L. M. Isbell and G. L. Clore. 2014. The Affective Control of Thought: Malleable, Not Fixed. Journal of Psychological Review 121: 600-618.
28. Isbell, L., E. C. Lair, and D. R. Rovenpor. 2013. Affect-as-Information about Processing Styles: A Cognitive Malleability Approach. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology Compass 72: 93-114.
29. Jalilvand, A., M. R. Noroozabad., and J. Switzer .2018. Informed and uninformed investors in Iran: Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Economics and Business 95: 47-58.
30. Koonce, L. , Z. Leitter, and B. White. 2021. The effect of a warning on investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Review of Accounting Studies 2021: 1-23.
31. Koonce, L., N. Seybert, and J. Smith. 2016. Management Speaks, Investors Listen: Are Investors Too Focused on Managerial Disclosures?. The Journal of Behavioral Finance 17(1): 31-44.
32. Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 221-247.
33. Li, F. 2010. The information content of forward-looking statements in corporate filings-A naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research 48: 1049-1102
34. MacGregor, D. G., P. Slovic., D. Dreman., and M. Berry. 2000. Imagery, affect and financial judgment. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 1:104-110.
35. Miller, B. 2010. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading, The Accounting Review 85: 2107-2143.
36. Nguyen, L., G. Gallery., and C. Newton. .2019. The joint influence of financial risk perception and risk tolerance on individual investment decision‐making. Accounting & Finance 59: 747-771.
37. Pak, O., and M. Mahmood .2015. Impact of personality on risk tolerance and investment decisions. International Journal of Commerce and Management 25(4):370-384.
38. Pinjisakikool, T. 2017. The effect of Personality Traits on Households’ Financial Literacy. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education 16(1): 39-51.
39. Rapp, C., and B. Walther. 2000. Strategic Benchmarks in Earnings Announcements: The Selective Disclosure of Prior-Period Earnings Components. The Accounting Review 75:151-177.
40. Ray, C, J. R. Hustinger. 2017. Feeling and Thinking: An Affect-as-Cognitive Feedback Account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 11(5): 1-14.
41. Rennekamp, K. 2012. Processing Fluency and Investors' Reactions to Disclosure Readability. Journal of Accounting Research 50: 1319-1354.
42. Rennekamp, K., and P. D. Witz. .2021. Linguistic Formality and Audience Engagement: Investors’ Reactions to Characteristics of Social Media Disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research 38(3): 1748-1781.
43. Sadiq, M., and H. Amna. .2019. Impact of Personality Traits on Risk Tolerance and Investors' Decision Making. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics 8(1): 1-20.
44. Shiller, R. J. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton NJ: Princeton Press.
45. Shwarz, N. 1990. Feelings as Information: Informational and Motivational Functions of Affective States. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior 527-561.
46. Shwarz, N. 2012. Feelings-as-Information Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology 289-308.
47. Shwarz, N., and J. L. Clore. 1983. Mood, Attribution and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(3): 513-523.
48. Tan, H. T., E. Y. Wang and B. Zhou. 2014. When the Use of Positive Language Backfires: The Joint Effect of Tone, Readability and Investor Sophistication on Earnings Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 52(1): 273-302.
49. Tan, H. T., E. Y. Wang and B. Zhou. 2015. How does readability influence investors’ judgments? Consistency of benchmark performance matters. The Accounting Review 90(1): 371-393.
50. Tetlock, P. C. 2007. Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The role of Media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance 62(3): 1139-1168.
51. Tetlock, P., M. Saar-Tsechansky, and S. Macskassy. 2008. More than words: Quantifying language to measure firms' fundamentals. Journal of Finance 63: 1437-1467.
52. You, H., and X. Zhang. 2009. Financial Reporting Complexity and Investor Under Reaction to 10-K Information. Review of Accounting Studies 14: 559-586.
53. Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences. American Psychologist 35(2): 151-175.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
farajzadeh dehkordi H, faghfour maghrebi Y. Identifying the Factors Affecting the Quality of Investors’ Judgment and Decision-Making Based on Cognitive Psychology. aapc 2022; 7 (13) :399-429
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1118-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666