[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 2, Issue 3 (9-2017) ::
aapc 2017, 2(3): 169-184 Back to browse issues page
The Impact of Personality Type on the Professional Judgment of the Auditor in Allocation of Time Budget on Estimated Accounts
Moslem Saeidi Goraghani 1, Ahmad Nasseri2
1- Member of Factuly of Sistan & Baluchestan University(Corresponding Author) , Moslem.saeidi@acc.usb.ac.ir
2- Assistatnt Professor of Sistan & Baluchestan University. (nasseri@acc.usb.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (7933 Views)
A large part of the audit opinion is based on professional judgment. So auditors personality characteristics that in some studies has been identified as a factor influencing on the professional judgment, should be more closely examined. This research was conducted in 2016  with the aim of the finding an answer to this question whether does personality type effect on the auditors' professional judgment? The population of the auditors in auditing institutions in Iran and sample included 184 members of the community. Data needed to test the hypothesis is collected through NEO and Kaplan & Reckers questionnaires and using the software SPSS 24 were analyzed. Results of regression analysis showed that among NEO personality dimensions only neuroticism is significant positive correlation with professional judgment. Other personality dimensions such as extroversion, flexibility, agreeableness, conscientiousness have no significant relationship with professional judgment.
Keywords: Professional judgment, Personality, Auditing, NEO Personality questionnaire.
Full-Text [PDF 151 kb]   (3254 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/04/20 | Accepted: 2017/05/5 | Published: 2017/09/22
References
1. Abdolmohammadi, M, and Wright.(1987). “An Examination of Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments”. The Accounting Review, No. 1,:1-13.
2. Anugerah,R, Sari,R.N, and E. Primadona.(2014). “Personal Characteristics and Quality of Audit Work: study on regional internal audit bodies in Indonesia”. International Accounting Business Conference.
3. Balkir, I.(2000), “Effect of Analytical Review Results, Optimism and Pattern for Coping on Audit Effort of Accounting Estimates. Doctoral thesis in Canada
4. Bigus, J. (2016): Optimism and Auditor liability, Accounting and Business Research:1-24.
5. Ferdinand A. Gul, Donghui Wu, and Zhifeng Yang (2013) Do Individual Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from Archival Data. The Accounting Review: November 2013, Vol. 88:1993-2023
6. Gibbins, M and Mason A. K. (1998). “ Professional Judgment in Financial Reporting”. Canadian Institue of Charterd Accountants.
7. Gundry, Leanne C. (2006).
8. Hu, C, Parmod Chand, and Elaine Evans (2013) The Effect of National Culture, Acculturation, and Education on Accounting Judgments: A Comparative Study of Australian and Chinese Culture. Journal of International Accounting Research: Fall, Vol. 12, No. 2: 51-77.
9. Jaffar, Nahariah., Salleh, Arfah., Mohd Iskandar, Takiah And Haron, Hasnah (2006).
10. Kent.P, Munro.L and T. Gambling.(2006). Psychological Characteristics Contributing to Expertise in Audit Judgment.International Journal of Auditing.NO(10): 125-141.
11. Luo, L., Shufang, K., oiling, S., Chang-Qin, L. (2010). “Work stressors, Chinese Coping Strategies, and Job Peformance in Greater China”. International Journal of Psychology.Vol.45, No.4: 294-302.
12. Mala, R and Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective”. Accounting Perspective. Vol.14, No.1: 1-50.
13. Mauts, R.K., and H.A.Sharaf, (1961), “The Philosophy of Auditing”, Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
14. Nelson, M, Tan, Hung-Tong, Tan (2005).
15. Pinkus ( 1984).
16. Rios-Figueroa,C.B and R.C Cardona(2013).Dose Experience Affect Auditors Professional Judgment? Evidence from Puerto rico. Accounting and Taxation.Vol.5 .No.2 :13-32.
17. Scheier, M. F. and Carver, C. S. ,(1992). ‘Effects of Optimism on Psychological and Physical Well-Being”:Theoretical Overview and Empirical Update, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16: 201-228.
18. Wedemeyer, PD. (2010). A discussion of Auditor Judgment as the Critical Component in Audit Quality – A Practitioner’s Perspective. International Journal of Disclosureand Governance. Vol.7, No.2: 320-333.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saeidi Goraghani M, Nasseri A. The Impact of Personality Type on the Professional Judgment of the Auditor in Allocation of Time Budget on Estimated Accounts. aapc 2017; 2 (3) :169-184
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-266-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 2, Issue 3 (9-2017) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666