[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) ::
aapc 2022, 7(13): 256-297 Back to browse issues page
Planning and Validation of Multi-dimensional Model of Professional Ethics of the Supreme Audit Court
Amin allah Tavassoli1 , Reza Sotudeh 2, Habib Piri3
1- Phd Student, Department of Accounting, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Zahedan(amin.tavassoli@iau.ac.ir)
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, nikshshr Branch, Islamic Azad university, nikshahr, IranCorresponding Author) , r.sotudeh@iauzah.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad university, Zahedan, Iran(hhpiri1354@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (1139 Views)
Ethics is the prerequisite of every healthy society. In fact, each profession should possess its own appropriate ethical guidelines. The State Account Court also requires principles of professional ethics. So far, no ethical model suitable for this organization has not been presented. The purpose of the present study is to offer a multidimensional model design and validation for the professional ethics of the State Accounts Court. This is a qualitative and exploratory research. The model design is based on content analysis of the collected scientific texts (including articles and theses published in the field of professional ethics in Iran). It was done through in a library method. Then, using interviews with faculty members with a working experience in governmental organizations, middle managers of the State Accounts Court, and the working managers in the auditing organization selected in a purposive method, the research model was extracted. Next, using factor analysis method and PLS software, the validation of the above- mentioned model was performed. According to the research findings, the multidimensional model of professional ethics in the State Accounts Court owns 3 dimensions, 11 components, and 148 indicators. The dimensions and components of the professional ethics model in the State Accounts Court include spiritual ethics (religious component), individual ethics (value and behavior), social ethics (cultural and human responsibility), organizational ethics (inter/ intra organization), legal ethics (rules of the Court of Accounts as well as other laws), and environmental ethics (sustainability and observance of intergenerational rights). Moreover, the values ​​of factor load, T-Value, and Stone- Geisser index (Q2) all confirm the validity and quality of the model. This organization is directly influenced by moral and cultural values, and any non-compliance with ethics can distort its organizational mission. Thus, through drawing the organization's attention to ethical issues, the multi-dimensional model of professional ethics can prevent inefficient employee behaviors.
 
Keywords: Professional Ethics, Organizational ethics, Social Ethics, Supreme Audit Court
Full-Text [PDF 467 kb]   (323 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/08/14 | Accepted: 2022/11/10 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Ahmed, A. 2010. Ethics in auditing; and ethical studies in different accounting bodies. Available at SSRN 1631346.
2. Awaluddin, M., N. Nirgahayu, R. S. Wardhani, and A. Sylvana. 2019. The effect of expert management, professional skepticism and professional ethics on auditors detecting ability with emotional intelligence as modeling variables. International journal of islamic business and economics (IJIBEC) 3(1): 49-67.
3. Bujang, M. A., E. D. Omar, and N. A. Baharum. 2018. A review on
4. Comer, D. R., and L. E. Sekerka. 2018. Keep calm and carry on (ethically): Durable moral courage in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review 28(2): 116-130.
5. Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika 16(3): 297-334.
6. Drozd, I., M. Pysmenna, and V. Volkov. 2020. Management of ethical behavior of auditors. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 6(4): 66-71.
7. Dunn, P., and B. Sainty. 2019. Professionalism in accounting: a five-factor model of ethical decision-making. Social Responsibility Journal.
8. Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18(1): 39-50.
9. Gaffikin, M. 2007. Accounting theory and practice: the ethical dimension.
10. Hair, J. F., J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review 31(1): 2-24.
11. Hajilo, V., G. Memarzadeh, and M. Alborzi. 1397. Designing an ethical model for human resource development for Public Agencies. Quarterly Ethical Research (Association for Islamic Thought) 33(9): 37-60.
12. Ismail, S., and N. Yuhanis. 2018. Determinants of ethical work behaviour of Malaysian public sector auditors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration.
13. Ivan from going bad? The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May.
14. Johari, R. J., M. M. Alam, and J. Said. 2021. Investigating factors that influence Malaysian auditors’ ethical sensitivity. International Journal of Ethics and Systems 37(3): 406-421.
15. Kline, P. 1994. An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
16. Kohlberg, L. 2002. The philosophy of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages essays on moral development. San Francisco: Harper& Row: 123-137.
17. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Validity in content analysis.
18. Lail, B., J. MacGregor, J. Marcum, and M. Stuebs. 2017. Virtuous professionalism in accountants to avoid fraud and to restore financial reporting. Journal of business ethics 140(4): 687-704.
19. Lee, Y.-t., A. Stettler, and J. Antonakis. 2011. Incremental validity and indirect effect of ethical development on work performance. Personality and Individual Differences 50(7): 1110-1115.
20. Liyanapathirana, N., and G. Samkin. 2014. Towards an integrated ethical decision making model for the accounting Profession. Sri Lanka: A Developing Country. 113(3): 675-684.
21. McDevitt, R., C. Giapponi, and C. Tromley. 2007. A model of ethical decision making: The integration of process and content. Journal of business ethics 73(2): 219-229.
22. Pratama, B. C., Z. A. Ahmad, and M. N. Innayah. 2018. Obedience Pressure, Professional ethics, attitude of skepticism and Independence towards audit Judgment. Journal of Accounting Science 2(2): 141-149.
23. Richey, R. C., and J. D. Klein. 2014، Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues: Routledge.
24. Sarstedt, M., and J.-H. Cheah. 2019،Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review. In: Springer.
25. Smith, L. , and D. Murphy. 2008. Luca Pacioli: The Father of Accounting. Texas A&M University.
26. Tota, I., and H. Shehu. 2012. The dilemma of business ethics. Procedia Economics and Finance 3: 555- 559.
27. Vogel, D. 2009. Manager's journal: Could an ethics course have kept
28. Yoon, C. 2011. Ethical decision-making in the Internet context: Development and test of an initial model based on moral philosophy. Computers in Human Behavior 27(6): 2401-2409.
29. Yusoff, Z. Z. M., W. A. Salleh, Z. Zakaria, G. K. S. Nair, T. Vadeveloo, and A. Luqman. 2011. The influence of personal and organizational factors on ethical decision making intentions among managers. International Journal of Business and Management 6(9): 261.
30. researchers. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS 25(6): 85.
31. sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
tavassoli A A, sotudeh R, piri H. Planning and Validation of Multi-dimensional Model of Professional Ethics of the Supreme Audit Court. aapc 2022; 7 (13) :256-297
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1114-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645