[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 14 (3-2023) ::
aapc 2023, 7(14): 405-432 Back to browse issues page
The Application of Atride Stirling's Theme Analysis in the Analysis of Environmental Reporting Indicators
Raheleh Nazarian1 , Akram Taftiyan 2, Forough Heyrani3
1- Ph.D. student in Accounting, Yazd branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran Rnazaryan@iauk.ac.ir
2- Assistant Professor of Accounting, Yazd branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran (Corresponding Author) , Taftiyan@iauyazd.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor of Accounting, Yazd branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran (Heyrani@iauyazd.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (3204 Views)
Considering the importance of environmental issues and the serious challenge that companies face to report their environmental activities, the purpose of this research is to analyze environmental reporting indicators; which can be used to strengthen and improve this type of reporting, as one of the important accountability tools in front of the stakeholders. In the first phase, the literature in the field of environmental reporting was reviewed, which indicates that compared to most countries in the world, Iranian companies have neglected environmental reporting, and no law or standard requires companies to disclose environmental information. Therefore, any disclosure in this field is voluntary and indicates the absence of verifiable and specific indicators in order to prepare an environmental report. Then, qualitative data were collected through interviews with experts and experienced academic and executive experts in the mentioned field in 1400. Therefore, any disclosure in this field is voluntary and indicates the absence of verifiable and specific indicators in order to prepare an environmental report. Then, qualitative data were collected through interviews with experts and experienced academic and executive experts in the mentioned field in 1400.These experts were selected based on the purposeful sampling method with the snowball approach, and conducting interviews continued until reaching theoretical saturation. In the second phase, after reviewing the interviews, the collected qualitative data were coded and categorized using Atride-Sterling's thematic analysis method and MaxQuda software. The findings of theme analysis led to the identification of 2 global themes, 7 organizing themes and 39 basic themes. The results of this research show that environmental reporting can be explained based on two global themes of 1- hard information disclosure and 2- soft information disclosure. Identifying environmental reporting indicators on this basis and using them by increasing the ability to verify information leads to improved accountability, reducing information asymmetry and making appropriate decisions.
 
Keywords: Environmental reporting, Theme analysis, Hard information, Soft information
Full-Text [PDF 718 kb]   (563 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/09/1 | Accepted: 2023/02/6 | Published: 2023/08/20
References
1. Acar, M., and H. Temis. 2020. Emprical analysis on corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure in an emerging market context. International Journal of Emerging Market, 15(6): 1061- 1082.
2. Attride-Stirling, J. 2001. Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3): 385-405.
3. Baalouch, F., S. Damak Ayadi, and K. Hussainey. 2019. A study of the determinants of environmental disclosoure quality: evidence from French listed company. Journal of Managment and Gavernance , 23: 939- 971.
4. Belal, A., S. Cooper, and N. Khan. 2015. Corporate environmental responsibility and accountability: what chance in vulnerable Bangladesh. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33: 44-58.
5. Benlemlih, M., and L. Cai. 2020. Corporate environmental performance and financing decisions. Business ethic, the environment and resposibility, 29(2): 248-265.
6. Bertomeu, J., and I. Marinovic. 2016. A theory of Hard and Soft information. The Accounting Review, 9(1): 1-20.
7. Boyatzis, R. 1998. Teransforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development.
8. Braam, G., L. Uit de Weerd, M. Hauck, and M. Huijbregts. 2016. Determinants of corporate environmental reporting: the importance of environmental performance and assurance. Journal of Cleaner Production 129: 724-734.
9. Bradshaw, M., X. Wang, and Z. Dexin. (2019). Soft Information in the Financial Press and Analysts’ Recommendation Revisions.
10. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2): 11-101.
11. Buccinaa, S., D. Chen, and J. Gramlich. 2013. Accounting for the environmental impacts of Texaco's operations in Ecuador: Chevron's contingent environmental liability disclosures. Accounting Forum, 37(2): 110-123.
12. Burgwa, D., and R. Vieira. 2014. Environmental Disclosure Determinants in Dutch Listed Companies. R. Cont. Fin. – USP, São Paulo, 25(64): 60-78.
13. Cho, C., and D. Patten. 2013. Green accounting: reflections from a CSR and environmental disclosure perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6): 443-447.
14. Christensen, H., E. Floyd, L. Liu, and M. Maffett. 2017. The Real Effects of Mandated Information on Social Responsibility in Financial Reports: Evidence from Mine-Safety Records. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2-3): 284-304.
15. Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, G. D Richardson, and F. P Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33: 303-327.
16. Clarkson, P., Y. Li, G. Richardson, and F. Vasvari. 2011. Does it Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2): 122-144.
17. Deegan, C. 2013. The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet ... really? Areflection on 'green accounting and green eyeshades twenty years later. Critical Perspectives on Accounting,, 24(6): 448-458.
18. Deegan, C. 2019. Legitimacy theory: despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(8): 2307-2329.
19. Dobler, M., L. Kaouthar and D. Zégha. 2015. Corporate environmental environmental sustainability disclosures and environmental risk: Alternative tests of socio-political theories. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change: 301-332.
20. Dobriyal , P., A. Qureshi, R. Badola, and S. Hussain. 2012. A review of the methods available for estimating soil moisture. Journal of Hydrology: 110-117.
21. GRI. 2016. Foundation as part of GRI (101) Standards. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/
22. Gola, K., P. Mendiratta, G. Gupta, and M. Dharwal. 2022. Green accounting and its application: a study on reporting practices of environmental accounting in India. World Review of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development, 18(1): 23-39.
23. Guba, E., and Y. Lincoln. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research Vol. 2: 163-194.
24. Gunawan, J. (2007). Corporate Social Disclosures by Indonesian Listed Companies: A Pilot Study. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3): 26-34.
25. Haller, A., and C. van Staden. 2014. The value added statement–an appropriate instrument for integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(7): 1190-1216.
26. Helfaya, A., M. Whittigton and C. Alavatage. 2019. Exploring the quality of corporate Environmental Reporting: Surveying preparers' and users' perceptions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountibility, 4: 2015-2023.
27. ICAEW. Cosulted on 28 August 2010. New reporting models for business. Web of Institute chartered Accountants in Englan and Wales. Available at: www.icaew.co.uk/bettermarkets
28. KPMG. 2017. The road ahead, The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting. KPMG International.
29. King, N., and C. Horrocks. 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. SAGE Publication.
30. Kleine , A., and M. von Hauff. 2009. Sustainability-driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Trinangel. Journal of Business Ethic, 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z.
31. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis, an Introduction to Its Metodology. 2nd Edition, especially chapter 11. SAGE Publication.
32. Li , D., M. Huang, S. Ren, X. Chen, and L. Ning. 2018. Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4): 1089-1104.
33. Liberti, J., and M. Petersen. 2019. Information: Hard and Soft. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 8(1): 1-41
34. Lindberg  , D., and D. Seifert. 2010. A New Paradigm of Reporting. The CPA Journal, 80(1): 36-39.
35. Miles, M., A. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2020. Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook . Fourth edition.
36. Nowell, L., J. Norris, D. White, and N. Moules. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1-13.
37. Ong, T., T. Trireksan, and H. Djajadijerta. 2016. Hard and soft sustainability disclosures: Australia’s resources industry. Accounting Research Journal, 29(2): 198-217.
38. Papa, M., M. Carrassi, A. Muserra, and M. Wieczorek-kosmala. 2022. The impact of the EU nonfinancial information directive on environmental disclosure: evidence from Italian environmentally sensitive industries. Meditaryi Accountancy Research, 30(7): 87-120.
39. Park, S. 2017. Corporate social responsibility, visibility, reputation and financial performance: empirical analysis on the moderating and mediating variables from Korea. Social Resposibility Journal, 13(4): 856-871.
40. Parker, L. D. 2019. Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of corporate reputation in the airline industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47: 215-221.
41. Petersen, M. 2004. Information: Hard and Soft. Northwestern university.
42. Pramanik, A., N. Shil, and B. Das. 2008. Corporate Environmental Reporting: An Emerging Issue in the Corporate World. International Journal of business and managment, 3(12): 149-154.
43. Raadt, A., M. Warrens, R. Bosker, and H. Kiers. 2019. Kappa Coefficients for Missing Data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(3): 558-576.
44. Ryan, G., and H. Bernard. 2003b. Techniques to identify Thems. Field Methods, 15(1): 85-109.
45. Scot, W. R. 2008. Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory and society, 37(5): 427-442.
46. Setyorini, C., and Z. Ishak. 2012. Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Case of Mimetic Isomorphism. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(5): 11-17.
47. Shahid Ullah, M. 2020. The influence of global, country and firm-level governance on social and environmental reporting: Evidence from developing countries. Management School, Faculty of Social Science. The University of Sheffield: A thesis for philosophy.
48. Vinh Khuong, N., T. Thuy Khanh, P. Anh Thu, and B. Ngoc Linh1. 2020. Corporate Environmental Disclosure Practices in Vietnam. Research in World Economy, 11(1): 143-152.
49. Wachira, M., and D. Mathuva. 2022. Corporate Environmental Reporting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Further Research. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, 10: 159-182.
50. patten, D. 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 27(8): 763-773.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nazarian R, Taftiyan A, Heyrani F. The Application of Atride Stirling's Theme Analysis in the Analysis of Environmental Reporting Indicators. aapc 2023; 7 (14) :405-432
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1120-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 14 (3-2023) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645