[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
Asymmetric cost behavior of family firms: Socio-emotional Wealth perspective; Cost Stinckness
Farshad Sabzalipour PhD 1, Ghareibeh Esmailikia2 , Elahe Arzani3
1- Assistant Professor of Accounting, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. (Corresponding Author) , f.sabzalipour@ilam.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor of Accounting, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. Gh.esmailikia@ilam.ac.ir
3- MSc of Management Accounting, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran. (elahe.arzani0948@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (272 Views)
The management accounting literature traditionally focuses on the economic explanation of asymmetric cost behavior. While non-economic considerations likely also a role in explaining resource adjustment decisions. The socio-emotional wealth perspective refers to non-financial aspects such as the identity and ability to exercise influence of the owners that satisfy the emotional needs of the family owners. In this regard, the cost behavior of family firms is the result of non-economic goals such as protecting the socio-emotional wealth of family owners, and these goals will lead to asymmetric cost behavior. The pourpose of the present research is to examine the asymmetric cost behavior in family companies according to the socioemotional wealth perspective. In this regard, the data from 154 firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange during the period from 2016 to 2021 has been used. Hypotheses have been tested using multivariate regression models. The findings indicate that family firms have greater costs than non-family firms. In addition, the findings showed that family firms with a high percentage of family ownership and family CEOs have more cost stickiness than non-family firms. On the other hand, the presence of a high proportion of family managers on the board does not lead to an increase in the cost stickiness of family firms compared to non-family firms. Understanding how family firms adjust their costs in response to changes in demand is useful for investors and analysts who forecast the future earnings and cash flows of these firms.
Keywords: Asymmetric cost behavior, Family firms, Socio-Emotional Wealth Perspective.
Full-Text [PDF 1233 kb]   (4 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/01/13 | Accepted: 2024/05/25
1. Abudy, M., and E. Shust. 2022. Selling, general, and administrative cost behavior of family firms. Working paper. The Open University.
2. Accounting Research, 26(2), 43–79
3. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., Huang, R., & Janakiraman, S. N. 2007. Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, & Finance, 22(1), 1–28.
4. Anderson, M. C., R. D. Banker, and S. N. Janakiraman. 2003. Are selling, general, and administrate costs ‘sticky’? Journal of Accounting Research 41: 47–63.
5. Anderson, R. C., D. M. and Reeb. 2003. Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301–1328.
6. Astrachan, J. H., S. B. Klein, and K. X. Smyrnios. 2002. The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1): 45–58.
7. Balakrishnan, R., T. S. Gruca. 2008. Cost stickiness and core competency: A note. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4): 993–1006.
8. Banker, R. D., & Byzalov, D. 2014. Asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management
9. Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, M. Ciftci, and Mashruwala, R. 2014. The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2): 221–242.
10. Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, S. Fangand and Y. Liang. 2018. Cost management research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3): 187-209.
11. Banker, R. D., D. Byzalov, and L. T. Chen. 2013. Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior, Journal of Accounting and Economics 55(1): 111–127.
12. Banker, R., Basu, S., Byzalov, D., & Chen, J. 2016. The confounding effect of cost stickiness on conservatism estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 203–220.
13. Banker, R.D. & Chen, L. 2006. “Predicting earnings using a model of cost variability and cost stickiness”, The Accounting Review, 81(1), 285-307.
14. Berrone, P., C. Cruz, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2012. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3): 258–279.
15. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
16. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. 2003. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1169–1208.
17. Betriebswirtschaftliche Rundschau 4 (4-5): 65-73
18. Block, J. 2010. Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23(2): 109–130.
19. Brasch, H. D. 1927. Zur Praxis der Unkostenschwankungen und ihrer Erfassung.
20. Bu, D., C. Wen, and R. D. Banker. 2015. Implications of asymmetric cost behaviour for analysing financial reports of companies in China. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 3(3): 181-208.
21. Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. 2015. Cost Stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and
22. Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. 2006. A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140.
23. Chen, C. X., H. Lu, and T. Sougiannis. 2012. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs, Contemporary Accounting Research 29(1): 252–282.
24. Chen, J. V., I. Kama, and R. Lehavy. 2019a. A contextual analysis of the impact of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behaviour. Review of Accounting Studies, 24(2): 665-693.
25. Chen, S., X. Chen, and Q. Cheng. 2008. Do family firms provide voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3): 499–536.
26. Cheung, J., Kim, H., Kim, S., & Huang, R. 2018. Is the asymmetric cost behavior affected by competition factors? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1–2), 218–234.
27. Chung, C. Y., S. K. Hur, and C. Liu. 2019. Institutional investors and cost stickiness: Theory and evidence. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47: 336-350.
28. Costa, M. D., & Habib, A. 2021. Trade credit and cost stickiness. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 1139-1179.
29. Determinants, Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), PP. 248–261.
30. Dierynck, B., W. R. Landsman, and A. Renders. 2012. Do managerial incentives drive cost behavior? Evidence about the role of the zero earnings benchmark for labor cost behavior in private Belgian firms, The Accounting Review 87(4): 1219–1246
31. Eddleston, K. A., J. J. Chrisman, L. P. Steier, and J. H. Chua. 2010. Governance and trust in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34(6): 1043– 1056.
32. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., C. Cruz, P. Berrone, and J. de Castro. 2011. The bind that Ties Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 653–707.
33. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., K. T. Haynes, M. Nunez-Nickel, K.J. L. Jacobson, and J. MoyanoFuentes. 2007. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106– 137.
34. Hall, C. M. 2016. Does ownership structure affect labor decisions? The Accounting Review, 91: 1671–1696.
35. Han, S., Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. 2019. Is cost stickiness associated with management earnings forecasts? Asian Review of Accounting, 28(2), 173–211.
36. Hartlieb, S., T. R. Loy, and B. Eierle. 2020. Does community social capital affect asymmetric cost behaviour? Management Accounting Research, 46: 100640.
37. Hasenack, W. 1925. Betriebskalkulationen im Bankgewerbe. Bank- und finanzwirtschaftliche Abhandlungen. Springer.
38. He, J., Tian, X., Yang, H., & Zuo, L. 2020. Asymmetric cost behavior and dividend policy. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(4), 989–1021.
39. Höglund, H., & Sundvik, D. 2019. Do auditors constrain intertemporal income shifting in private companies? Accounting and Business Research, 49(3), 245–270.
40. Jin X., and H. Wu. 2021. Economic policy uncertainty and cost stickiness, Management Accounting Research 52: 100750.
41. Kama, I., & Weiss, D. 2013. Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of accounting research, 51(1), 201-224.
42. Kitching, K., Mashruwala, R., & Pevzner, M. 2016. Culture and cost stickiness: A cross-country Study. The International Journal of Accounting, 51(3), 402–417.
43. Leitterstorf, M. P., and S. B. Rau. 2014. Socioemotional wealth and IPO underpricing of family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5): 751–760.
44. Li, W., & Zheng, K. 2018. Rollover risk and managerial cost adjustment decisions. Accounting and Finance, 60(3), 2843–2878.
45. Lopatta, K., Kaspereit, T., & Gastone, L.-M. 2020. Managerial style in cost asymmetry and shareholder value. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(5), 800–826.
46. Ma, L., Wang, X., and C. Zhang. 2021. Does religion shape corporate cost behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 170: 835–855.
47. Minichilli, A., M. Nordqvist, G. Corbetta, and M. D. Amore. 2014. CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: A socio-emotional wealth perspective on family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 51(7): 1153– 1179.
48. Naoum, V. C., Ntounis, D., Papanastasopoulos, G., & Vlismas, O. 2023. Asymmetric cost behavior: Theory, meta-analysis, and implications. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 100578.
49. Noreen, E. and N. Soderstrom. 1994. Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? Evidence from hospital departments. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1): 255-278.
50. Noreen, E. and N. Soderstrom. 1997. The accuracy of proportional cost models: Evidence from hospital service departments. Review of Accounting Studies 2 (1): 89-114.
51. Pazzaglia, F., S. Mengoli, and E. Sapienza. 2013. Earnings quality in acquired and nonacquired family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective. Family Business Review, 26(4): 374–386.
52. Prabowo, R. 2019. Cost behavior, ownership types, and managerial ability. University of Groningen, SOM research school.
53. Prabowo, R., R. Hooghiemstra, and P. Van Veen-Dirks. 2018. State ownership, socio-political factors, and labor cost stickiness. European Accounting Review, 27(4): 771–796.
54. Schepers, J., W. Voordeckers, T. Steijvers, and E. Laveren. 2014. The entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Small Business Economics, 43(1): 39–55.
55. Sharma, P., and S. Manikutty. 2005. Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure & community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(3): 293–311.
56. Shust, E., & Weiss, D. 2014. Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior—Sticky costs: Expenses versus cash flows. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 81–90.
57. Siciliano, G., and D. Weiss. 2023. Family Ownership Influence on Cost Elasticity. European Accounting Review, 1-31.
58. Silge, L., & Wöhrmann, A. 2021. Market reaction to asymmetric cost behavior: the impact of long-term growth expectations. Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), 309-347.
59. Stockmans, A., N. Lybaert, and W. Voordeckers. 2010. Socioemotional wealth and earnings management in private family firms. Family Business Review, 23(3): 280–294.
60. Strike, V. M., P. Berrone, S. G. Sapp, and L. Congiu. 2015. A Socioemotional Wealth Approach to CEO Career Horizons in Family Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4): 555–583.
61. Strube, E. 1936. Kostenremanenz und Beschäftigungsschwankungen. Zeitschrift für Handelswissenschaftliche Forschung 30 (10): 505-541.
62. Tang, L., Huang, Y., Liu, J., & Wan, X. 2020. Cost stickiness and stock price crash risk:Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1–26
63. Venieris, G., Naoum, V. C. & Vlismas, O. (2015). Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses. Management Accounting Research, 26: 54-82.
64. Via, N., & Perego, P. 2014. Sticky cost behaviour: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting and Finance, 54(3), 753–778.
65. Weiss, D. 2010. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 2442-2472.
66. Yang, D. 2015. Mergers, CEO hubris, and cost stickiness. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(5), 46–63.
67. Yao, K. 2018. Cost Stickiness, Ownership Concentration and Enterprise Risk—Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Companies. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8(01): 163.
68. Zattoni, A., L. Gnan, and M. Huse. 2015. Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board process and tasks. Journal of Management, 41(4): 1214–1243.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4655