1. Achmad, T., I. Ghozali,, & D. Pamungkas. 2022. Hexagon Fraud: Detection Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting In State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1): 3-16 2. Adhania. S, Holiawati, Nofryanti. (2024). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud Theory in Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. International Journal of Digital Marketing Science Vol.1 No.1: 10-23 3. Akomea-Frimpong. I., C. Andoh., & E. D. Ofosu-Hene. 2016. Causes. effects and deterrence of insurance fraud: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Financial Crime. 23(4): 1-26 4. Albrecht, W. S. (1991). Fraud in government entities: The perpetrators and the types of fraud. Government Finance Review, 7(6), 27-30. 5. Andriani. K. F., K. Budiartha., M. M. R. Sari., & A. A. G. P. Widanaputra. 2022. Fraud pentagon elements in detecting fraudulent financial statement. Linguistics and Culture Review. 6(S1): 686-710. 6. Anggreini. S. Z., & D. N. Himmawan. 2022. Pentagon theory dan model beneish Mscore. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 5(2):965–973. 7. Apriliana. S., and L. Agustina. 2017. The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi 9 (2): 154–65. 8. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc. 2020:1–88. 9. Aulia Haqq. P. N., & G. S. Budiwitjaksono. 2020. Pentagon Fraud analysis for predicting the fraud in financial reporting.Journal of Economics. Business. & Accountancy Ventura.22(3): 319-332. 10. Azhari. H, Lenggogeni. L. 2024. Determinants of Fraudulent Financial Statements Using an Approach Fraud Hexagon. DIJEFA. Vol. 4, No 11. Cahyanti. D. 2020. Analisis Fraud pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Analisis Fraud Pentagon Sebagai Pendeteksi Kecurangan Terhadap Laporan Keuangan. 53(9): 1689–1699. 12. Cressey, D. (1973). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Patterson Smith, Montclair, NJ. 13. Crowe H. 2011. Playing Offense in a High-Risk Environment. Crowe Horwath, New York, NY. 14. Crowe Horwath. (2011). Playing Offense in a High-Risk Environment. Crowe Horwath, New York. 15. Damayani. F., T. Wahyudi. & E. Yuniartie. 2017. Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Infrastruktur Yangterdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sriwijaya. Vol 11. No 2: 108-128 16. Damayanti. F., C. Kuntadi., R. P. Warsoyo. 2024. Studi Literatur Review: Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Reporting with The Audit Committee and Independent Commissioners as Moderating Variables. quality Access to Success Vol. 25. No. 198: 10-19. 17. Eisenhardt. K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review: 57–74. 18. Faidah. F., & T. Suwarti. 2018. Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode Tahun 2015–2017. Faculty of Economic and Business. Vol 7. No 2: 8-22 19. Ghaisani. H. M., A. Triyono., D. B. Bawono. 2022. Analysis of Financial Statement Fraud: The Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model Approach and the Audit Committe as Moderating Variable. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology. Volume 6 Issue 6: 115– 25 20. Khairani. K ., D. Susetyo., Y. Yusnaini., H. Yusrianti. 2024. Fraud Hexagon And Fraudulent Financial Reporting: The Role Of Power Distance. Migration Letters. Volume: 21. No: S3: 824-845 21. Matangkin. L. Ng. S., & A. Mardiana. 2018. Pengaruh Kemampuan Manajerial Dan Koneksi Politik Terhadap Reaksi Investor Dengan Kecurangan Laporan Keungan Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. simak. 16(02): 182– 209. 22. Mukhtaruddin. E. S., Hakiki. A., Saftiana. Y., and Kalsum. U. 2020. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Banking and Financial Sector Companies. Issues in Business Management and Economics 8 (2): 12–24 23. Ongoro. M. O. 2018. The Use of financial ratios in detecting fraudulent financial reporting: the case of companies listed on the Nairobi Securities Exchange (Thesis). Strathmore University. 24. Pradipta. A., & Y. Bernawati. 2019. The Influence of Pressure. Opportunity. Rationalization and Ethical Value on the Accounting FraudTendency. Sustainable Business Accounting and Management Review: 63–71. 25. Sahla. W.A. and A. Ardianto. 2023. Ethical values and auditors fraud tendency perception: testing of fraud pentagon theory. published in the Journal of Financial Crime. Vol. 30. No. 4: 966-982. 26. Sandelowski. M., & J. Barroso. 2006. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company. 27. Shleifer. A., & Vishny. R. W. 1994. Politicians and firms. The quarterly journal of economics. 109(4):995-1025 28. Sihombing, T., & Panggulu, G, E (2022). Fraud Hexagon Theory And Fraudulent Financial Statement In It Industry In Asean. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 12(3), 524-544. 29. Skousen. C. J., K. R. Smith., C. J. Wright. 2009. Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Corporate governance and firm performance. Vol. 13. Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 53–81. 30. Vousinas. G. L. 2019. Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime. 26(1): 372–381. 31. Wolfe, D., Hermanson, D.R.(2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 38–42.
|