[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 5(10): 129-103 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of locus of Control and Organizational Commitment on Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior Based on the Theory of Planed Behavior
Reza Rostaminia1 , Rezvan Hejazi 2, Ghodratolah Talebnia3 , Rasol Baradaran Hasanzadeh4
1- PhD student,Department of Accounting, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran(r.rostaminia@iau-shoushtar.ac.ir)
2- Professor of accounting,Department of Accounting, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kish Island, Iran(Corresponding author) , Hejazi33@gmail.com
3- associate professor,Department of Accounting, Sciense and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.(gh_talebnia@yahoo.com))
4- associate professor,Department of Accounting, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran(drh313@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (8893 Views)
Acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior is accepting any activity that is against the audit standards. This behavior is a serious problem for professional auditing that can lead to its failure. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of internal locus of control, external locus of control and organizational commitment to the acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior Based on the Theory of Planed Behavior. The target population of this study is the auditors of Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants in the year 2018. The sample was chosen by random sampling method and 310 auditors were selected by using Cochran formula. Data were collected by questionnaire and then they were analyzed by structural equation model with the approach of Partial Least Squares. The Smart PLS software was used for analyzing the data. The results of the analysis showed that the internal locus of control and organizational commitment had the negative effect and the external locus of control had a positive effect on the acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior. This means that auditors with internal locus of control and organizational commitment, avoid accepting dysfunctional audit behavior and auditors with external locus of control tend to accept the audit dysfunctional behavior.
Keywords: Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behaviors, Locus of Control, Organizational Commitment, Premature sign-off, Theory of Planned Behavior
Full-Text [PDF 376 kb]   (1044 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2019/05/8 | Accepted: 2019/05/31 | Published: 2021/02/19
References
1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. 2003. Questions Raised by a Reasoned Action Approach: Reply to Ogden. Health Psychology 23: 431-438
2. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. 2000. Attitudes and the Attitude–Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.). European Review of Social Psychology 11: 1–33.
3. Alderman, C. W., and Deitrick, J. W. 1982. Auditors’ Perception of Time Budget Pressures and Premature Sign offs: A Replication and Extension. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1(2):54-68.
4. Baskara, A. E., and Ike, S. 2011. Penerimaan Auditor atas Dysfunctional Audit Behavior (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Tengah). MAKSI 11(1): 1-17.
5. Benkhoff, B. 19970. Ignoring Commitment Is Costly: New Approaches to Establish the Missing Link between Commitment and Performance. Human Relations 26: 701-726.
6. Chan, K., Kleinman, G., and Lee, P. 2009. The Impact of Sarbanes‐Oxley on Internal Control Remediation. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management 17(1): 53-65.
7. Kanchana, P., and Panchanatham N. 2012. Analytical study on Organizational Commitment with Reference to Tamil Nadu Papers limited, Kagidapuram, Karur District. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1).
8. Desmond C.Y. Yuen., Philip K.F. Law., and Chan Lu, Jie Qi Guan, 2013 Dysfunctional auditing behaviour: empirical evidence on auditors' behaviour in Macau. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 21 (3): 209-226,
9. Donnelly, D. P., and Quirin, J. J., and Bryan, D. O. 2003. Auditor Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: An Explanatory Model Using Auditors Personal Characteristics. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15: 87-110.
10. Donnelly, D. P., and Quirin, J. J., and Bryan, D. O. 2006. Attitudes toward Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: The Effects of Locus of Control, Organizational Commitment, and Position. The Journal of Applied Business Research 19(1): 95-108.
11. Donnelly, D. P., and Quirin, J. J., and Bryan, D. O. 2011. Attitudes toward Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: The effects of Locus of Control, Organizational Commitment, and Position. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 19(1).
12. Frucot, V., and Shearon, W. T. 1991. Budgetary Participation, Locus of Control, and Mexican Managerial Performance and Job Satisfaction. The Accounting Review 66(1): 80-99.
13. Gable, M., and F. Dangello. 1994. Locus of control, Machiavellianism, and managerial job performance. The Journal of Psychology 128: 599–608.
14. Ghorbanpour, Z., and Dehnavi, H. D., and Heyrani, F. 2014. Examination of Auditor Acceptance of Dysfunctional Behavior Using a Heuristic Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 4(1): 41-51.
15. Hyatt, T. A., and Prawitt, D. F. 2001. Does Congruence Between Audit Structure and Auditors’ Locus of Control Affect Job Performance. The Accounting Review 76(2): 263-274.
16. Koonce, L.L., and Mercer, M. (2005). Using Psychology Theories in Archival Financial Accounting Research. McCombs Research Paper Series No. ACC-01-05.
17. Lightner, S. M., and Adams, S. J., and Lightner, K. M. 1982. The influence of Situational, Ethical, and Expectancy Theory Variables on Accountants’ Underreporting Behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2: 1-12.
18. Malone, C. F., and Roberts, R. W. 1996. Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 15(2).
19. Margheim, L., and Kelley, T. 1990. The Impact of Time Budget Pressure Personality, and Leadership Variables on Dysfunctional Auditor Behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practices & Theory 9: 21-42.
20. Margheim, L., and Pany, K. 1986. Quality Control, Premature Signoff, and Underreporting of Time: Some Empirical Findings. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 5(2): 50-63.
21. Mowday, R., Porter, L. W., and Steers R. M. 1982. Employee-Organizational Linkages. New York, NY: Academic Press.
22. Mowday, R., Steers, R. M., and Porter, L. W. 1979. The measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14: 224–227.
23. Paino, H., Ismail, Z., and Smith, M. 2014. Modelling Dysfunctional Behaviour: Individual Factors and Ethical Financial Decision. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 145: 116-128.
24. Paino, H., Pahang, U. T. M., and Ismail, Z., Smith, M. 2011. Dysfunctional Audit Behaviour: The Effects of Employee Performance, Turnover Intentions and Locus of Control. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 7(4): 418-423.
25. Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., and Mowday, R.T., and Boulian, P.V. 1974, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology 59: 603-609
26. Rotter, J. B. 1973. The Future of Clinical Psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 40(2): 313-321.
27. Shapeero, M., Chye Koh, H., and Killough, L. N. 2003. Underreporting and Premature Sign-off in Public Accounting. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(6/7): 478-489.
28. Spalding, M. D., and Grenfell, A. M. 1997. New estimates of Global and Regional Coral Reef Areas. Coral Reefs 16(4): 225-230.
29. Solar, D., and D. Bruehl. 1971. Machiavellianisn and locus of control: Two conceptions of interpersonal power. Psychological Reports 29: 1079–1082.
30. Spector, P. E. 1988. Development of the Work Locus of Control Sscale. Journal of Occupational Psychology 61: 335–340.
31. Spector, P. E. 1982. Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin 91: 482–497.
32. Sulistiyo, H., & Ghozali, I. (2017). The Role of Religious Control in Dysfunctional Audit Behavior: An Empirical Study of Auditors of Public Accounting Firm in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(5), 1047-1058.
33. Sulistiyo, H., Darsono, D., and Subchan, S. 2018. An empirical study on the role of auditor independence in reducing dysfunctional audit behavior of public accountants in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success. 19(167):93-97.
34. Srimindarti, C., and Widati, L. W. 2015. The Effect of Locus of Control and Organizational Commitment to Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 7(1): 27-35.
35. Svanstrom. T. 2016. Time Pressure, Training Activities and Dysfunctional Auditor Behaviour: Evidence from Small Audit Firms. International Journal of Auditing. 20: 42-51
36. Tervo, T., Murphy, L, S., and Pitman, M. 2014. Dysfunctional Auditor Behavior: The Effects of Tone at the Top and Supervisors’ Relationships, in (ed.) Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting (Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 17: 47 - 77
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rostaminia R, Hejazi R, Talebnia G, Baradaran Hasanzadeh R. The Effect of locus of Control and Organizational Commitment on Acceptance of Dysfunctional Audit Behavior Based on the Theory of Planed Behavior. aapc 2021; 5 (10) :129-103
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-631-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 10 (2-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666