[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 6(11): 251-275 Back to browse issues page
The Impact of Financial Performance Indicators and Audit Implications on Readability Financial Reports in Companies Listed in the Iranian Capital Market
Yaghoub Hosseinpour1 , Naser Izadinia 2, Hamzeh Mohammadi Khoshoui PhD3
1- Isfahan(khorasgan)Branch,IslamicAzad University,Isfahan,Iran(yhp.hosseinpour@gmail.com)
2- Associate Professor of Accounting, University of Isfahan, Isfahan ,Iran(Corresponding Author) , N.Izadinia@ase.ui.ac.ir
3- Assistant Professor of Accounting, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran(mohammadi.khosh@yahoo.com)
Abstract:   (3930 Views)
.Managers and auditors in the performance and audit process in recent years pay special attention to the way information is presented and the readability of financial reporting and try to manage it. Managers using the hypothesis of management ambiguity seek to obscure and to conceal information through complicating and less transparency in financial reporting. On the other hand, auditors also assess the risk of audit contracts with employers. This study aims to investigate the performance indicators and audit implications on the Linguistic Complexity of Financial Information Disclosure based on Readability in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this study, the return on assets as a performance indicator and the delay of the audit report and changes of the auditor as audit outcomes and to measure readability, the Fog index has been used. Data of 152 companies were analyzed by elimination sampling method for the period 2010 to 2020. The research method is regression analysis and data panel and GMM approach has been used to test the research models. The results of testing the hypotheses show that the return on assets have a negative and significant effect on the readability of financial statements. In addition, the delay of the auditorchr's report has a positive effect on the readability and the auditorchr's changes have a negative and significant effect on the readability of the auditorchr's report.
Keywords: Financial Performance Indicators, Audit Implications, Readability of financial reporting
Full-Text [PDF 482 kb]   (766 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/05/3 | Accepted: 2021/08/23 | Published: 2021/08/23
References
1. Ajina, A., Laouiti, M., & Msolli, B. 2016. Guiding through the Fog: Does annual report readability reveal earnings management? Research in International Business and Finance, 38: 509–516.
2. Abernathy,J.L.,Guo, F., Kubik, T.R. & Masli, A.2018. Financial statement footnote readability and corporate audit outcomes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory,38(2) : 1-26
3. Asay, H.S., Libby, R. & Rennekamo, K. 2018. Firm performance, reporting goals, and language choices in narrative disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(2-3): p 380-398,
4. Ashton, R.H., Willingham, J.J., & Elliott, R.K. 1987. An empirical analysis of audit delay. Journal of Accounting Research, 25(2), 275-292
5. Aymen، A.، B.S. Sourour، and M. Badreddine. 2018. The effect of annual report readability on financial analysts’ behavior. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting 5(1): 26-37.
6. Bloomfield, R. 2002. The “Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis” and Financial Reporting. Accounting Horizons, 16(3) : 233–243.
7. Boubaker,S, D, Gounopoulos, and H, Rjiba. 2019, Annual report readability and stock liquidity. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 28(2): 159-186
8. Chun, C., Hui, K & Zhang, Y. 2016. "Analyst Report Readability and Stock Returns". Available at SSRN2182422.
9. Courtis, J. K. 1987. Fry, Smog, Lix and Rix: Insinuations About Corporate Business Communications. JThe Journal of Business Communication, 24(2): 19–27.
10. Davis, A. K., Piger, J. M., & Sedor, L. M. 2012. Beyond the Numbers: Measuring the Information Content of Earnings Press Release Language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 845–868.
11. Dempsey,S.J ., Harrison,D.M., Luchtenberg,K.F.,& Seiler,M.J. 2010. Financial Opacity and Firm Performance: The Readability of REIT Annual Reports.Springer Scince + Business Media, LLC 2010.
12. DeFond, M. L., Chee, Y. L. & Zaang, Y. 2016. Client Conservatism and Auditor-Client Contracting. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 69–98
13. De Souza, J.A.S., Rissatti, J.C., Rover, S. & Borba, J.A. 2019. The linguistic complexities of narrative accounting disclosure on financial statements: An analysis based on readability characteristics. Research in International Business and Finance, 48: 59-74,
14. DuBay, W. H. 2004. The principles of readability. Impact Information. https://doi.org/10.1.1.91.4042
15. Fakhfakh, Mondher.2015. The readability of international illustration of auditor’s report: An advanced reflection on the compromise between normative principles and linguistic requirements. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 20
16. Fisher, R,, Van Staden, C. & Richards, G. 2019. Watch that tone: An investigation of the use and stylistic consequences of tone in corporate accountability disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(1): p 77-105.
17. Hasan, M.M. 2017. Managerial ability, annual report readability and disclosure tone (April 23, 2017).
18. Hillegeist, S. A. 1999. Financial reporting and auditing under alternative damage appointment rules. The Accounting Review, 74(3), 347-369.
19. Hung, Y.S. & Cheng, Y.C. 2018. The impact of information complexity on audit failures from corporate fraud: Individual auditor level analysis. Asia Pacific Management Review 23 2018: 72-85.
20. Jones, M. J. 1988. A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman’s Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company. Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), 297–305.
21. Jones, M. J., & Shoemaker, P. A. 1994. Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142–184.
22. Kim, Y. & Park, M. S. 2014. Real activities manipulation and auditors' client-retention decisions. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 367-401.
23. Knechel, W. R., & Payne, J. L. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 137-146.
24. Lee, T. A., & Tweedie, D. P. 1975. Accounting information: an investigation of private shareholder usage. Accounting and Business Research, 5(20): 280-291
25. Leffa, V. J. 1996. Fatores da compreensão na leitura. Cadernos Do IL, 15(15): 143–159.
26. Li, F. 2008. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3): 221–247.
27. Lo, K., Ramos, F., & Rogo, R. 2017. Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1):1–25.
28. Lobo, G.J., & Zhao, Y. 2013. Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1385-1412
29. Miller, B. P. 2010. The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 2107–2143.
30. Pound, G. D. 1981. "A note on audit report readability", Accounting and Finance, 21, 1.
31. Previts, G. J., Bricker, R. J., Robinson, T. R. & Young, S. J. 1994. A content analysis of sellside financial analysts company reports. Accounting Horizons, 8(2), 55–70.
32. Schroeder, N., & Gibson, C. G. 1990. Readability of Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Accounting Horizons, 4(4), 78–87.
33. Shu, S. Z. 2000. Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173-205.
34. Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. 1987. The Impact of Litigation Risk on Audit Pricing: A Review of the Economics and the Evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 120–134
35. Smith, M., & Taffler, R. 1992. Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(4): 84–98..
36. Shu, S. Z. 2000. Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173-205.
37. You, H., and X. Zhang. 2009. Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies 14 (4): 559-586.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

hosseinpour Y, Izadinia N, Mohammadi Khoshoui H. The Impact of Financial Performance Indicators and Audit Implications on Readability Financial Reports in Companies Listed in the Iranian Capital Market. aapc 2021; 6 (11) :251-275
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-981-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.26 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666