[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: ::
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Business Ethics on the Moral Reasoning Ability of Accountants and Auditors with the Mediating Role of Moral Courage and Machiavellianism and the Moderating Role of Human Resource Flexibility
Hojatollah Zangiabadi1 , Omid Pourheidari *2 , Ahmad Khodamipour3
1- PhD student of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. ho.zangiabadi@aem.uk.ac.ir
2- Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. (Corresponding Auther) , opourheidari@uk.ac.ir
3- Professor of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. khodamipour@uk.ac.ir
Abstract:   (60 Views)
Adherence to ethical principles is a core driver of the sustainable development of the accounting and auditing professions, enhancing professional judgment and decision making while strengthening institutional legitimacy through public trust. Within this framework, individual-level business ethics provides a key lens for understanding professional behavior and ethical reasoning. This study examines the influence of business ethics on accountants’ and auditors’ ethical reasoning, incorporating the mediating effects of moral courage and Machiavellianism and the moderating role of human resource flexibility. Using an applied, survey-based design, data were collected in 2024 from 337 accountants and 253 auditors and analyzed using structural equation modeling via SmartPLS. The findings show that business ethics enhances ethical reasoning both directly and indirectly across both professions. For auditors, the indirect effect operates primarily through moral courage, whereas for accountants it functions mainly through reduced Machiavellian tendencies. Moreover, human resource flexibility strengthens the positive relationship between business ethics and ethical reasoning in both groups. Overall, the results underscore the importance of integrating individual moral mechanisms and organizational enablers in developing ethics-based policies and human resource management practices within companies and audit firms.
 
Keywords: Business ethics, Moral reasoning ability, Moral courage, Machiavellianism, Human resource flexibility
     
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/10/5 | Accepted: 2026/03/1
References
1. Ananda, F., and D. Marlius. 2021. Indications of Machiavellianism in ethical decisions of senior accountants. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2019) (p. 10). European Alliance for Innovation.
2. Ballantine, J., and P. McCourt. 2011. The impact of ethical orientation and gender on final-year undergraduate auditing students’ ethical judgments. Accounting Education, 20(2): 187–201.
3. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
4. Belschak, F. D., D.N. Den Hartog, and A.H. De Hoogh. 2018. Angels and demons: The effect of ethical leadership on Machiavellian employees’ work behaviors. Frontiers in psychology, 9: 1082.‌
5. Bereczkei, T. 2017. Machiavellianism: The psychology of manipulation. Routledge.
6. Bhattacharya, M. D.E., D. E. Gibson, and D.H. Doty. 2005. The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and HR practices on firm performance. Journal of Management, 31(4): 622–640.
7. Bickhoff, L., P.M. Sinclair, and T. Levett-Jones. 2017. Moral courage in undergraduate nursing students: A literature review. Collegian, 24(1): 71–83.
8. Black, E. L., F.G. Burton, and J.K. Cieslewicz. 2022. Improving ethics: Extending the theory of planned behavior to include moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(4): 945–978.
9. Blasius, L. 2007. Comparison of moral reasoning and transformational leadership of publicschool principals using inclusive education in Michigan (Doctoral dissertation, Central Michigan University).
10. Bucciarelli, M., S. Khemlani, and P.N. Johnson-Laird. 2008. The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(2):121–139.
11. Cahya, F. A., C. R. Kurniawan, and S. Ikhsan. 2025. Senior Management Support Moderates the Influence of Auditor Characteristics on Internal Audit Effectiveness. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 12(2): 1-14.
12. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Comer, D. R, & M. Schwartz. 2017. Highlighting moral courage in the business ethics course, Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4): 703-724.
14. Coşkun, M. (2024). Moral foundations and moral exclusion as determinants of outgroup helping and moral courage (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University).
15. Dalton, D., and R.R. Radtke. 2013. The joint effects of Machiavellianism and ethical environment on whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1): 153–172.
16. De la Cruz, C. D., J.L. Fernández-Fernández, and I. Ferrero. 2022. Ethical decision-making: From practice to theory. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, 13: 207–244.
17. DeTienne, K. B., C.F. Ellertson, M.C. Ingerson, and W.R. Dudley. 2021. Moral development in business ethics: An examination and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3): 429–448.
18. Duckworth, C. 2023. Moral courage and manager regret. Business Ethics. the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2): 467–477.
19. Ehiriudu, M., J. Alaoma, M. Igweonyia, O. Virginia, M. Ani, and G. Naezichukwuolu. 2021. A critical appraisal of moral courage as ethical behaviour among the auditing profession: Issues and challenges.
20. Etim, E. O., I. J. Confidence, U. P. Umo, A. B. Inyang, & S. W. Tueridei. 2024. Accounting ethics and minimization of financial crimes in the Nigerian banking sector. International Journal of Accounting Intelligence, 2 (3): 75–95.
21. Ferrell, O. C., D. E. Harrison, L. Ferrell, and J.F. Hair. 2019. Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95: 491–501.
22. Fornell, C. & D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
23. Gaffikin, M., and A. S. L. Lindawati. 2012. The Moral Reasoning of Public Accountants in the Development of a Code of Ethics: The Case of Indonesia. Australasian Accounting. Business and Finance Journal, 6(1): 3-28.
24. Gala, P., R. Chauhan, R. King, & S. Vitell. 2023. Investigating consumer ethical beliefs: role of moral philosophies and personality traits. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(6), 685-701.
25. Gašić, D., N. Berber, A. Slavić, and T. Jevtić. 2025. Flexible work arrangements as a strategy for reducing job stress: Empirical insights from Serbia. Proceedings of EKONBIZ (25).
26. Gürlek, M. 2020. Shedding light on the relationships between Machiavellianism, career ambition, and unethical behavior intention. Ethics & Behavior, 30(1): 83–99.
27. Habibzadeh, S., M. Alinezhad Sarokolaei, & M. Zeynali. 2025. The Distortions of Machiavellianism, Containment Solutions and Effect on the Quality of Audit Judgments. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 9(2), 135-156.‌
28. Hair, J. F., G.T.M. Hult., C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N.P. Danks, and S. Ray. 2021. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.
29. Hair, J. F., M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and S. P. Gudergan. 2018. Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
30. Han, Z., Z. Zhu, D. Wang, & W. Wei. 2024. Responsible leadership and employee ethical voice: mediating role of ethical efficacy and moderating role of moral identity. Current Psychology, 43(37): 29516-29527.‌
31. Hannah, S. T., B.J. Avolio, and D.R. May. 2011. Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 663-685.
32. Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, & M. Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1): 115-135.
33. Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2016. Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3): 405–431.
34. Islam, G. 2020. Psychology and business ethics: A multi-level research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 165: 1–13.
35. Jones, D. N., and D.L, Paulhus. 2014. Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1): 28–41.
36. Khelil, I., O. Akrout, K. Hussainey, & H. Noubbigh. 2018. Breaking the silence: An empirical analysis of the drivers of internal auditors' moral courage. International Journal of Auditing, 22(2): 268–284.‌
37. Kidder, R. M. 2005. Moral courage, digital distrust: Ethics in a troubled world. Business & Society Review, 110(4): 485–503.
38. Kiradoo, G. 2020. Ethics in accounting: Analysis of current financial failures and role of accountants. International Journal of Management, 11(2):241–247.
39. Knechel, W. R., G. V. Krishnan, M. Pevzner, L. B. Shefchik, & U. K. Velury. 2013. Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1): 385–421.
40. Kock, N. 2015. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of eCollaboration, 11(4): 1-10.
41. Kumary, I., and R. Pradham. 2014. Human resource flexibility and organizational effectiveness: Role of organizational citizenship behaviour and employee intent to stay. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(11): 43–51.
42. Leisti, V. M. 2021. The relationship between business ethics and organizations: A study on the role of business ethics in organizations.
43. Mertz, J., and C. Bloomquist. 2024. The practice of moral courage: Resolving economic and social tensions. Open Journal of Leadership, 13(4): 488–514.
44. Mnif, Y., and E. Rebai. 2022. Flexibility and job stress in the accounting profession. Accounting Research Journal, 35(2): 261–275.
45. Muterera, J., J. A. Brettle, and A. Khorakian. 2024. Assessing the relationship between auditor well-being and audit quality: Insights from the North American auditing context. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics,11(4).
46. Noser, A. E., V. Zeigler-Hill, J. K. Vrabel, A. Besser, T.D. Ewing, and A. S. Southard. 2015. Dark and immoral: The links between pathological personality features and moral values. Personality and Individual Differences, 75: 30–35.
47. Numminen, O., H. Repo, and H. Leino-Kilpi. 2017. Moral courage in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Ethics, 24(8): 878–891.
48. Olubusola, O., O. H. Daraojimba, A. O. Ajayi-Nifise, T. Falaiye, and N. Z. Mhlongo. 2024. Ethical challenges in accounting: A review of case studies from the USA and Africa. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(2): 146–158.
49. Onumah, R. M., Y.S. Nana, and K. Amoako. 2021. The effects of ethics education interventions on ethical attitudes of professional accountants: Evidence from Ghana. Accounting Education, 30(4): 413–437.
50. Painter-Morland, M., S. Kirk, G. Deslandes, and C. Tansley. 2019. Talent management: The good, the bad, and the possible. European Management Review, 16(1): 135–146.
51. Prawiranegara, G. P. 2023. The influence of auditor competence, independence, and ethics on audit quality: Survey in West Java provincial government institutions. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal), 17(1): 130–136.
52. Pulungan, A. H., K. J. A. T. Sari, S. Maharsi, and A. Hasudungan. 2021. Authentic leadership and whistleblowing: The mediating roles of trust and moral courage. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 5(2): 265–289.
53. Pulungan, A. H., and A. Fitriningrum. 2019. Machiavellianism, corporate ethical values, and accountants’ ethical decision making. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 4(1).
54. Ratnawati, V., R. Anggraini, S. Maharsi, and R. Fitrios. 2021. Determinants of ethical decision-making: A study on the role of the professionalism of members of the Indonesian Association of Tax Consultants. Journal of Tax Reform, 9(2): 246–261.
55. Rest, J. R., D. Narvaez, M. J. Bebeau, & S. J. Thoma. 1999. Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Sabuhari, R., A. Sudiro, D. Irawanto, and M. Rahayu. 2020. The effects of human resource flexibility, employee competency, organizational culture adaptation, and job satisfaction on employee performance. Management Science Letters, 10(8): 1775–1786.
57. Sarstedt, M., J. F. Hair, M. Pick, B. D. Liengaard, L. Radomir, & C. M. Ringle. 2022. Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5): 1035-1064.‌
58. Schaltegger, S., J. Hörisch. and R.e. Freeman. 2019. Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3): 191–212.
59. Sekerka, L. E., R.P. Bagozzi, and R. Charnigo. 2009. Facing ethical challenges in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4): 565–579.
60. Sekerka, L. E., and R.P. Bagozzi. 2007. Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(2): 132–149.
61. Shafer, W. E., and Z. Wang. 2018. Machiavellianism, social norms, and taxpayer compliance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27: 42–55.
62. Tharifah, I. K., and D.M. Putra. 2024. Enhancing young auditor performance through flexibility and work–life balance. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 15(1): 158–168.
63. Triki, A., G. L. Cook, & D. Bay. 2017. Machiavellianism, Moral Orientation, Social Desirability Response Bias, and Anti-intellectualism: A Profile of Canadian Accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 623-635.
64. Wang, Z., S. Ren, D. Chadee, & Y. Chen. 2024. Employee ethical silence under exploitative leadership: the roles of work meaningfulness and moral potency. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(1): 59-76.‌
65. Webb, M. T. 2008. An exploration of the relationship between moral reasoning and leadership style of athletic team coaches (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University).
66. Weideman, M., and K.B. Hofmeyr. 2021. The influence of flexible work arrangements on employee engagement: An exploratory study. Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(10): 41–62.
67. Zhang, Y. 2024. Business ethics and accounting professional ethics in financial fraud. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 14(3): 14–16.
68. Úbeda-García, M., E. Claver-Cortés., B. Marco-Lajara, P. Zaragoza-Sáez, and F. García-Lillo. 2018. High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 88: 397–406.
69. ‌Comer, D. R. and L.E. Sekerka. 2018. Keep calm and carry on (ethically): Durable moral courage in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2): 116–130.

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to the articles list Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 34 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741