[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 5, Issue 9 (8-2020) ::
2020, 5(9): 35-53 Back to browse issues page
Individual moods and Auditor’s Professional Skepticism
Korosh Amani Korosh1, Hashem Nikoumaram 2, Bahman Banimahd Bahman3
1- Ph.D Student of Accounting , Department of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch , Tehran(kouroshamani@yahoo.com)
2- Professor of Accounting , Department of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch ,Tehran(Corresponding Author) , h-nikoumaram@srbiau.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor of Accounting , Department of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj,(dr.banimahd@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (4534 Views)
 Professional skepticism is a basic concept in audit decision-making and judgment and a lack of it may decrease audit quality. Recently, the subject of professional skepticism has been noticed by the audit scholars.  Recent empirical studies have showed that auditor’s judgment and decision making would rise from behavioral and recognition subjects.  Hence, the aim of this paper is to study the effect of positive and negative moods on auditor’s professional skepticism as an element of the auditor’s judgment and decision making. This research is functional from study objective point of view and is a survey from methodology point of view.   The theoretical framework and literature review is collected through archival approach. Data collection is based on questionnaire.  The statistical sample are 107 auditors who are working in audit firms and time of research conduct is 2017.  We use multiple regression to analysis of the research data.  
The result of this study show that, there is a positive and significant relationship between the positive mood and professional skepticism. Also the relationship between negative mood and professional is negative and significant.
Keywords: Professional Skepticism, Judgment and Decision Making and Positive and Negative Mood
Full-Text [PDF 191 kb]   (275 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/11/30 | Accepted: 2018/01/30 | Published: 2020/08/22
References
1. ACCA.2017. Banishing Bias? Audit Objectivity, and the Value of professional Scepticism. Available at: http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/Technical/audit/pi-banishing-bias-prof-scepticism.pdf
2. Aschauer,E., M. Fink, A. Moro, K.Van Bakel-Auer, and B.Warming-Rasmussen. 2017. Trust and Professional Skepticism in the Relationship between Auditors and Clients: Overcoming the Dichotomy Myth. Behavioral Research in Accounting.29(1):19-42.
3. Bagley, P. L. 2010. Negative affect: A consequence of multiple accountabilities in auditing. Auditing. Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (2): 141–157.
4. Chiang,C.2016.Conceptualising the linkage between professional scepticism and auditor independence. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(2):180-200
5. Chung, J., J. R. Cohen, and G. S Monroe.2015. The Influence of a Self-Interest Threat to Auditor Independence and Emotion on Auditors’ Inventory Valuation Judgments. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2557630
6. Cianci, A. M., and J. L. Bierstaker. 2009. The impact of positive and negative mood on the hypothesis generation and ethical judgments of auditors. Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 119–144.
7. Farag. M.S, and R.Z. Elias. 2016. The relationship between accounting students’ personality, professional skepticism and anticipatory socialization, Accounting Education.25(2):124-138
8. Favere-Marchesi.A., and C.Emby.2017. The Alumni Effect & Professional Skepticism: An Experimental Investigation. Accounting Horizons In-Press. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51920
9. Forgas, J. P. 1995. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1): 39-66.
10. Forgas, J. P. and J. M. George .2001. Affective Influences on Judgments and Behavior in Organizations: An Information Processing Perspective, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86(1): 3–34.
11. Franken, I. H. A., and P.Muris.2005. Individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1):991–998
12. Glover, S. M and D.F.Prawitt. 2014. Practitioner summary: Enhancing auditor professional skepticism: The professional skepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2): 1-10.
13. Griffith, E. E., J. S.Hammersley, K.Kadous, and D.Young. 2015. Auditor mindsets and audits of complex estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1): 49-77.
14. Hammersley, J.S.2011.A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 30(4):101-128
15. Hurtt, R. K. 2010. Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29(1): 149-171
16. Isen, A.M., Shalker, T., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978), "Affect, accessibility of material in memory and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1-12.
17. Koch.C, A.Köhler, and K.Yankova. 2016. Professional Skepticism and Auditor Judgment: Does Trait Skepticism mitigate the recency bias? Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2880653
18. Kunda, Z. 2002. Social cognition: making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Lerner, J. S., and L. Z. Tiedens. 2006. Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2): 115-137.
20. Lindebaum, D.2013. Does emotional intelligence moderate the relationship between mental health and job performance? An exploratory study, European Management Journal31(3): 538-548
21. McKnight, C.A.,and W.F. Wright. 2011.Characteristics of relatively high-performance auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory.30(2):. 191-206.
22. Nelson, Mark W.2009. Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 28(2): 1-34.
23. Peytcheva., M.2014. Professional skepticism and auditor cognitive performance in a hypothesis-testing task, Managerial Auditing Journal .291(1):.27-49.
24. Schwarz, N. 2004. Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 14(3):332-348.
25. Thompson, M.M., M.E.Naccarato, K.C.H.Parker, and G.B. Moskowitz.2001. The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition.12(3):19-39.
26. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., and A.Tellegen 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54(6): 1063–1070.
27. Wegener, D. T., and R. E. Petty. 1994. Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (6): 1034–1048
28. Yan,H., and S.Xie. 2016. How does auditors’ work stress affect audit quality?Empirical evidence from the Chinese stock market. China Journal of Accounting Research 9(4):305–319.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

amani K, Nikoumaram H, banimahd B. Individual moods and Auditor’s Professional Skepticism. Valued and Behavioral Accountings Achievements. 2020; 5 (9) :35-53
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-309-en.html


Volume 5, Issue 9 (8-2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه دستاوردهای حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری Valued and Behavioral Accountings Achievements
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4258