[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 3, Issue 6 (2-2019) ::
aapc 2019, 3(6): 199-240 Back to browse issues page
Designing a Model and Explaining Persuasion Techniques in Disclosure Financial Reports by Companies with Job Acquisition Incentives Bias CEO
Sayeed Barati1 , Mohaamdareza Abdoli 2
1- Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood branch, Iran ( Daniyal.88@yahoo.com)
2- Associate Professor in Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood branch, Iran (corresponding author , mrab830@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3910 Views)
Increasing the regulatory environment and expanding the scope of the regulatory standards for financial reporting has, over the past few years, reduced the cost of representation and information asymmetry and increased the level of corporate disclosure of corporate financial statements. But one of the endogenous dimensions of quality that prevents the disclosure of financial statements is a matter of persuasion is reporting. The Purpose of this research is designing a Model and Explaining Persuasion Techniques in Disclosure Financial Reports by Companies with Job Acquisition Incentives Bias CEO in Tehran Stock Exchange companies. In this research, which was a hybrid research, in the qualitative section of the 18 accounting, human resources and financial management specialists, panel members were involved in the two sections of the critical evaluation and Delphi analysis with the researcher, and in a small part of the number 160 directors of Tehran Stock Exchange companies were selected through a simple random sampling for a period of 6 months From December 2017 to May 2018. In order to analyze the designed model, we used Structural Equation and Software (PLS). The results of the research showed that persuasive methods of promoting corporate financial reporting with three motivations for managerial occupation, namely, the motivation for power, motivation for self-affirmation and group and political motivation, have positive and significant advancements, while between persuasion in the disclosure of financial reports Companies have a negative and meaningful relationship with professional motives.
 
Keywords: Persuasion Techniques in Disclosure Financial Reports, Job Acquisition Incentives CEO
Full-Text [PDF 486 kb]   (1057 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/07/24 | Accepted: 2018/10/23 | Published: 2019/02/1
References
1. Aaker, Jennifer and Angela Y. Lee (2001), I Seek Pleasures and We Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research. 28 (1): 33–49.
2. Akerlof, G. (1980). The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1(3): 84-104.
3. Alonso, R., Camara, O. (2018). On the value of persuasion by experts. Journal of Economic Theory, 174(2): 103–123
4. Arnd, F., Hartmann, J. (2007). Regulatory focus and investment decisions in small groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43(4): 626-632. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.005
5. Bakshy, E. ; Karrer, B. & Adamic, L.A. (2009). Social Influence and The Diffusion of User-Created Content. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce: New York. 16(1): 325-334.
6. Barber, B. M., Odean, T., Zheng, L., 2006. Out of sight, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows. The Journal of Business 78 (6): 2095–2120.
7. Bates, Kenneth, Scot Burton, Elizabeth Howlett, and Kyle Huggins (2009). The Roles of Gender and Motivation as Moderators of the Effects of Calorie and Nutrient Information Provision on Away-from-Home Foods. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43 (2): 249–273.
8. Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22; 588–625.
9. Bourne, C. (2017). Trust management through discourse: Power and persuasion in financial services. CIPR Academic Conference, Stirling 21, University of Stirling, Scotland.
10. Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. (2006). Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman’s statement. Accounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(3): 493–511
11. Cronqvist, H., (2006). Advertising and portfolio choice. SSRN wp.
12. Dirks, K. T., Kostova, T., & Pierce, J. L. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7 (1): 84–107.
13. Ferretti, R. Pancotto, F., Rubaltelli, E. (2017). Persuasion in Financial Advertising: Behavioral or Rational?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2017.08.002
14. Foa, Edna B. and Uriel G. Foa, (2016). “Resource Theory of Social Exchange”. in K. Törnblom and A. Kazemi (eds.), Handbook of Social Resource Theory: Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications, Springer Science+Business Media, New York
15. Friedman, Ronald S. and Jens Förster (2001). The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6): 1001–1013.
16. Gallaher, S., Kaniel, R., Starks, L. T., (2006). Madison avenue meets wall street: Mutual fund families, competition and advertising. 15(5): 13-41.
17. Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., Pham, M. T. (2018). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment?. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 24(1): 218-255.
18. Grossman, S., Hart, O., et al., 1980. Disclosure laws and takeover bids. Journal of Finance 35 (2), 323–34.
19. Higgins, C., Walker, R. (2012). Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports. Accounting Forum 36(8): 194– 208.
20. Higgins, E. T. (2002). How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (3): 177–191.
21. Innstrand, S. T., Langballe, E. M. &Falkum, E. (2012). A Longitudinal Study of theRelationship between Work Engagement and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression. Stress & Health, 28(11): 1-10.
22. Jain, P. C., Wu, J. S. (2000). Truth in mutual fund advertising: Evidence on future performance and fund flows. The journal of finance, 55 (2): 937–958.
23. Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarsted, M., Hair, J, F. (2015). Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts: Implications for Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2): 121–139.
24. Khorana, A., Servaes, H. (2012). What drives market share in the mutual fund industry?. Review of Finance, 16 (1): 81–113.
25. Kleine, S. S., Kleine, R. E., III, & Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a possession ‘Me’ or ‘Not Me’? Characterizing types and an antecedent of material possession attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3): 327–343.
26. Knapp, J. R., Smith, B. R., & Sprinkle, T. A. (2014). Clarifying the Relational Ties of Organizational Belonging Understanding the Roles of Perceived Insider Status, Psychological Ownership, and Organizational Identification. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(3): 273–285.
27. Liberman, N, Lorraine, C, I., Christopher J., Camacho, E., Tory, H. (2001). Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6): 1135–1145.
28. Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N.M., & Bramble, T., Gardner J. (2007). A study of antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147 (5): 477-500.
29. Md-Sidin, S., Sambasivan, M., & Muniandy, N. (2009). Impact of psychological ownership on the performance of business school lecturers. Journal of Education for Business, 85(2): 50-56.
30. Mullainathan, S., Shleifer, A. (2015). Persuasion in finance. NBER 12 (11838). URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w11838
31. Nesselroade, K. Paul, James K. Beggan, S., Allison, T. (1999). “Possession Enhancement in an Interpersonal Context: An Extension of the Mere Ownership Effect”. Psychology and Marketing, 16 (1): 21–34.
32. Noblit G. (1988). Eta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies .CA: NEWBURY PARK.
33. Neubert, Doreen, Kathi Barth, and Marko Sarstedt (2015). “Examining the Role of Psychological Ownership and Feedback in Customer Empowerment Strategies”. working paper, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany.
34. O’driscoll, M., Pierce. J., & Coghlan, A. (2006). The psychology of ownership: work environment structure, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 31(3): 388-416
35. Ozler, H., Yilmaz, A., & Ozler, D. (2008). Psychological Ownership: an empirical study on its antecedents and impacts upon organizational behaviors. Problems And Perspectives In Management, 6(3): 168-193.
36. Palmiter, A. R., Taha, A. E., 2011. Mutual fund performance advertising: Inherently and materially misleading? Georgia Law Review 46(3): 1–48.
37. Peck, Joann, and Suzanne B. Shu (2018). “The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (3): 434–447.
38. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Haugtvedt, C. P (1992). Ego-Involvement and Persuasion: An Appreciative Look at Sherifs’ Contribution to Study of Self-Relevance and Attitud Change. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.) Social Judgment and Intergroup Relations: Essays in Honor of Muzafer Sherif, New York: Springer/Veriag.
39. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1): 84–107. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
40. Rebecca D. Watkins, Janice Denegri-Knott & Mike Molesworth (2015). The relationship between ownership and possession: observations from the context of digital virtual goods, Journal of Marketing Management, DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1089308.
41. Rudmin, F. W. (Ed.). (1991). To have possessions: A handbook on ownership and property. A Special Issue of the Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 6(6): 39-62.
42. Stigler, G. J. 1987. The economics of information. The journal of political economy, 15(1): 213- 225.
43. Suzane, Sh, B. (2011). Psychological ownership and effective reaction, Emotionalattachment process variables and the endowment effect, Psychological ownership and effective, 43(3): 12-38.
44. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possessiveness: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25 (4): Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (2016). Possession [Online]
45. Werth, L., Foerster, J. (2007). How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior, European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1): 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.343
46. Zhu, Rui Juliet and Loan Meyers-Levy (2007). Exploring the Cognitive Mechanism that Underlies Regulatory Focus Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1): 89–96
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Barati S, Abdoli M. Designing a Model and Explaining Persuasion Techniques in Disclosure Financial Reports by Companies with Job Acquisition Incentives Bias CEO. aapc 2019; 3 (6) :199-240
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-461-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 3, Issue 6 (2-2019) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666