[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 1, Issue 1 (9-2016) ::
aapc 2016, 1(1): 99-121 Back to browse issues page
The effect of corporate social responsibility and product diversification on performance evaluation
Mohammad Ali Aghaei1 , Mortoza Kazempour 2
1- Associated professor of accounting , management&economic faculty of Tarbiat Modares University (Aghaeim@modares.ac.ir)
2- , management&economic faculty of Tarbiat Modares University(Corresponding author) , Morteza.kazempour@modares.ac.ir
Abstract:   (6770 Views)

Companies resort to diversity in order to meet multiple needs of their customers so that by preserving their customers they would be able to improve performance and productivity. in the other hand, to experience a successful presence in the society, companies are trying to implement the concept of social responsiveness in the best way possible so that by doing this and in the process of increasing social satisfaction, performance of the company would be improved too. Therefore, The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of corporate social responsibility and product diversification on performance evaluation of companies member of the Tehran Stock Exchange.  in order to measure the variability of products the criteria of entropy was used and social responsibility was also used in applying the presented model in the appendix of the current article that has 6 dimensions of environmental and energy issues, products and services, human resources, customers, social reponsibilities and energy. return on asset ratio was used to measure and asses performance. the statistical population of the current research included 80 companies in the period of  2010 to 2015 (480 year/company). after statistical analysis, results showed that there is a positive and meaningful relationship between social responsibility and company performance and there is a negative and meaningful relationship between diversification and firm performance.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Diversification, Firm Performance
Full-Text [PDF 173 kb]   (4547 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/06/24 | Accepted: 2016/06/24 | Published: 2016/06/24
References
1. Aamir, M., A., Hayat, K., and Saddique, M., (2013). Impact of Unrelated Diversification on Financial Performance of the Firms: Evidence from Pakistan. Management and Administrative Sciences Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, 23-32
2. Abu Bakar, A. S.,and Ameer, R. (2011). Readability of corporate social responsibility communication in Malaysia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 50-60.
3. Alafi, K., and Hasoneh, A. B. (2012). Corporate social responsibility associated with customer satisfaction and financial performance a case study with Housing Banks in Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 15, 102–115.
4. Athar, I., Irfan, H., and Majid, Q. (2012). Impact of diversification on firms performance. American Journal of Scientific Research, No. 80, 42-53.
5. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., and Hatfield, J.D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal,Vol. 28, No. 2, 446–463.
6. Campa, J. M., and Kedia, S.(2002). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance, vol.57, 1731–1762.
7. Chakrabarti, A., Singh, K., and Mahmood, I. (2007). Diversification and performance: evidence from East Asian firms. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 101-120
8. Chia, W. H., and Heng, Y. L. (2008). Corporate Diversification and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Contractual Manufacturing Model. Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, 345-360.
9. Chiung, J. C., and Chwo, M. J. Y. (2012). Managerial ownership, diversification, and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Business Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, 518.534.
10. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., and Lang, L. H. P. (2003). When does corporate diversification matter to productivity and performance? Evidence from East Asia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol.11, No. 3, 365-392.
11. Crisostomo, V., Freire, F., and Vasconcellos, F. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol 7, No 2, 295-309.
12. Dadbeh, F., Bagherabadi, M., Abednazari, M., and Talaei, L. (2013). A study on effect of corporate diversification on firm performance and risk: evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 21, 2951-2958.
13. Danko, D., G., Jennifer, S., Goldberg, S. R.,. Grant, R. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The united states vs. Europe. The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, Vol. 19, No. 6, 41-47.
14. Fernandez S., Jose L., Luna, S., Ladislao, B., Diez, E. (2010). The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: A structural equation model analysis. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 91-101.
15. Galbreath, J., and Shum, P. (2012). Do customer satisfaction and reputationmediate the CSR–FP Link? Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 2, 211–229.
16. Graham, J., Lemmon, M., and Wolf, J. (2002). Does corporate diversification destroy value?. Journal of Finance, vol.57, 695–720.
17. Ishak, Z., and Napier, C. (2006). Expropriation of minority interests and corporate diversification in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management. Journal of Accounting and Finance, No.2, 85-113.
18. Johnson, Brian R.; Connolly, E., Carter, T., S. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: The role of fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,Vol. 18, No. 6, 352-369.
19. Kalhoul, I. and Hallara, S., (2010). The impact of diversification on firm. performance and risk : An emprical evidence, International research journal of finance and economics, 35, 150-162.
20. Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., and Liou, D. Y., (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan, Technology in Society, Vol. 31, No. 1,p:p 56–63.
21. Malcolm, S., Khadijah, Y., and AhmadMarzuki, A. (2007). Environmental disclosure and performance reporting in Malaysia, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp:185–199.
22. Maurizio, L., and Raffaele, S., (2012). Unrelated diversification and firm performance: 1980-2007 evidence from Italy. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp:75-82.
23. Oeyono, J., Samy, M., and Bampton, R., (2011). An examination of corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the top 50 Indonesian listed corporations. Journal of Global Responsibility, Vol. 2, No. 1, 100–112.
24. Peng, M. W., (2002). Towards an Institution-Based Viewof Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, No. 19, pp:251-267
25. Rettab, B., Brik, A., and Mellahi, K., (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp:371–390.
26. Roshayani, A., Faizah, D., Suaini, O., Mustaffa, M. Z., and Tay, K. L., (2009). Corporate responsibility concepts and emerging issues. Malaysia, University Publication Centre (UPENA), UiTM.
27. Saeidi, P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saiedi, P., and Saeidi, A., (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Jounal of Business Research, No. 68, pp:341-350.
28. Sandhu, H S; Kapoor, S., (2010). Corporate social responsibility initiatives: An analysis of voluntary corporate disclosure. South Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp:47-80.
29. Singh, M., Nejadmalayeri, A., and Mathur, I., (2007). Performance impact of business group affiliation: An analysis of the diversification-performance link in a developing economy. Journal of Business Research, vol.60, pp:339–347.
30. Stephanus, R. W., Michelle, D. W., and Toto, R., (2014). CSR and financial performance analysis: evidence from top ASEAN listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 164, pp:493-500.
31. Tangoli, L., Ping, E. J., and Chiu, W. K. C., (2005). International diversification and performance : evidence from Singapor. Asia Pacific Journal of management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 65-88.
32. Tsoutsoura, M., (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Working Paper. Haas School of Business, University of California.
33. Vazifeh dust, H., Dadbeh, F., and Hashemloo, F., (2014). Corporate diversification, information asymmetry and firm performance: evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Management science letters, Vol. 4,pp: 315-324.
34. Villalonga, B. ,(2004). Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from BITS establishment level data, Journal of Finance, vol.59, pp:475-502.
35. Villalonga, B., (2004). Does diversification cause the 'diversification discount'?. Financial Management, vol.33, pp:5-27.
36. Yan, Q., Amama, S., and Rajesh, T., (2014). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, Available at: http://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMAMEETINGS/EFMA%20ANNUAL%20MEETINGS/2014Rome/papers/EFMA2014_0510_fullpaper.pdf, [Online] [22 Jun 2015]
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aghaei M A, Kazempour M. The effect of corporate social responsibility and product diversification on performance evaluation. aapc 2016; 1 (1) :99-121
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-50-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 1, Issue 1 (9-2016) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666