[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) ::
aapc 2022, 7(13): 36-75 Back to browse issues page
Investigate the Effect of Social Pressure Anomie on Corporate Citizen Reporting
Soheila Sharif khafri1 , Mehdi Safari Gerayli 2, Ebrahim Givaki3 , Azar Moslemi4
1- PH.D Student Department of Accounting, khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, khomein, Iran.(s_ava2115@yahoo.com)
2- Associate Professor Department of accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran(Corresponding Author) , Mehdi.safari83@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor Department of management, khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, khomein, Iran(egivaki_1352@yahoo.com)
4- Assistant Professor Department of accounting, khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, khomein, Iran(azar.moslemi.kh@gmail.com)
Abstract:   (1899 Views)
With the change of traditional procedures towards modern management procedures, the reporting style of companies has also changed towards corporate citizen. This we increase commitment and responsibility towards stakeholders beyond the standards. The focus of this research is the development of corporate citizen reporting with the aim of creating a balance between the pressures of the stakeholders for information disclosure. This research is both qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative part, the dimensions of corporate citizen reporting were determined through meta-composition. In the quantitative part, this study is also a descriptive research that aims to investigate the effect of anomie of social pressure on corporate citizen reporting through structural equations. Research is being conducted between 2021-2022. The participants in the qualitative section were 15 university-level accounting professionals. They were selected through purposive sampling. In the quantitative section, 405 financial managers of TSE were selected through simple random sampling. The results show that the social pressure anomie has a positive and significant effect on corporate citizen reporting. In fact, the result is a reflection of the fact that corporate citizen reporting as a result of the norms formed by the anomie of social pressure can be a set of humanitarian actions; Charitable contributions and other forms of committed actions of the company towards the social environment and stakeholders
Keywords: Social Pressure Anomie, Corporate Citizen Reporting, Investor Protection
Full-Text [PDF 939 kb]   (575 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/06/15 | Accepted: 2022/10/16 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Abu-Tayeh, G., Neumann, O., and M. Stuermer, M. 2018. Exploring the Motives of Citizen Reporting Engagement: Self-Concern and Other-Orientation, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(1): 215–226.
2. Agudelo, M, A, L., Jóhannsdóttir, L., and B, Davídsdóttir. 2019. A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1): 25-43.
3. Andersen, S, E., and T, S. Johansen. 2021. Corporate citizenship: Challenging the corporate centricity in corporate marketing, Journal of Business Research, 12(4): 688-699.
4. Arora, N, K. 2018. Environmental Sustainability—necessary for survival, Environmental Sustainability, 1(1/2): 108-129.
5. Azizan, S, B. 2018. Does Corporate Citizenship Influence Financial Reporting Credibility?, Doctoral Dissertation, Australian National University.
6. Baah, Ch., Jin, Zh., and L, Tang. 2020. Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: Investigating corporate reputation as a missing link, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247(20): 119-125.
7. Carini, C., Rocca, L., Veneziani, M., and C. Teodori. 2021. Sustainability regulation and global corporate citizenship: A lesson (already) learned? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1): 116-126.
8. Carroll, A. B. 1998. The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100(1): 1-7.
9. Carroll, A. B. 2016. Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International journal of corporate social responsibility, 1(1): 1-8.
10. Cassells, S., and K, Lewis. 2019. Managing to be environmentally responsible: incentives and disincentives reported by small businesses, Small Enterprise Research, 26(1): 1-17.
11. Chiou, Ch, L., and P, G., Shu. 2019. How does foreign pressure affect a firm's corporate social performance? Evidence from listed firms in Taiwan, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 51(2): 1-22.
12. Dash, S.R. and Mahakud, J. 2013. Conditional multifactor asset pricing model and market anomalies", Journal of Indian Business Research, 5 (4):271-294.
13. Dash, S.R. and Mahakud, J. 2015. Market anomalies, asset pricing models, and stock returns: evidence from the Indian stock market, Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(3): 306-328
14. Esposito, P., and G, Antonucci 2021. NGOs, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development trajectories in a new reformative spectrum: ‘New wine in old bottles or old wine in new bottles?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2): 609-619.
15. Filizoz, B., and M, Fişne. 2011. Corporate social responsibility: A study of striking corporate social responsibility practices in sport management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24(2): 1405-1417.
16. Hasan, M.B., Hassan, M.K., Rashid, M.M., Ali, M.S. and Hossain, M.N. 2022. Calendar anomalies in the stock markets: conventional vs Islamic stock indices, Managerial Finance, 48(2): 258-276.
17. Khan, M., and, R. L, Watts. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48 (2/3): 132–150
18. Kothari, S, P., Leane, A, J., andm Ch, E., Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1): 163-197.
19. Liang, X., Dai, L. and S, Xie. 2022. Examining the social pressures on voluntary CSR reporting: the roles of interlocking directors, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3): 653-679.
20. Liu, X., and K, L., Lin. 2020. Green Organizational Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation, and Food Safety, Frontiers in Psychology, 11(3): 545-585.
21. Maheshwari, S. and Dhankar, R.S. 2017. Momentum anomaly: evidence from the Indian stock market, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 14(1): 3-22.
22. Maignan, I. and Ferrell, O.C. 2001. Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument ‐ Concepts, evidence and research directions, European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4): 457-484.
23. Marcella, R. and G, Baxter. 1999. The information needs and the information seeking behavior of a national sample of the population in the United Kingdom, with special reference to needs related to citizenship, Journal of Documentation, 55(2): 159-183.
24. Matten, D., Crane, A., and W, Chapple. 2003. Behind the mask: revealing the True Face of corporate citizenship. Journal of business Ethics, 45(2): 109-120.
25. Matten, D., and A, Crane. 2005. Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 166-179.
26. Ogola, F, O., and J, F, Mària. 2020. Mechanisms for development in corporate citizenship: a multi-level review, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(7): 109-137.
27. Palacios, J, J. 2010. Corporate citizenship and social responsibility in a globalized world, Citizenship Studies, 8(4): 383-402.
28. Putnam Rankin, C. 2021. Under pressure: exploring pressures for corporate social responsibility in mutual funds, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 16(3/4): 594-613.
29. Quick, R. and P, Inwinkl. 2020. Assurance on CSR reports: impact on the credibility perceptions of non-financial information by bank directors, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5): 833-862.
30. Rego, A; Leal, S; Cunha, M. P; Faria, J; and C, Pinho. 2010. How the perceptions of five dimensions of corporate citizenship and their inter-inconsistencies predict affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1): 107-127.
31. Rendtorff, J, D. 2020. Corporate citizenship, stakeholder management and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in financial institutions and capital markets, Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 4(1): 47-59.
32. Shinkle, G, A., and J, W., Spencer. 2012. The social construction of global corporate citizenship: Sustainability reports of automotive corporations, Journal of World Business, 47(1): 123-133.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sharif khafri S, Safari Gerayli M, givaki E, Moslemi A. Investigate the Effect of Social Pressure Anomie on Corporate Citizen Reporting. aapc 2022; 7 (13) :36-75
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1099-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666