[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) ::
aapc 2022, 7(13): 200-223 Back to browse issues page
The Relationship Between Social Dominance and Moral Dis-Engagement: Evidence from the Auditing Profession
Donya Malaki1 , Bahman Banimahd 2, Hamidreza Vakilifard3
1- Ph.D Student of Accounting, Department of Accounting,Islamic Azad University,Tehran Science and Research Branch, Tehran (donya.maleki@srbiau.ac.ir)
2- Associate Professor Department of accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran(Corresponding Author) , dr.banimahd@gmail.com
3- Associate professor in accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran( H-vakilifard@srbiau.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (1379 Views)
Ethics compliance is very important in the auditing profession. Ethical behavior as a social behavior depends on the attitude and social orientations of the society. One of these orientations is social dominance. So, the purpose of this paper is to study the relationship between social dominance and moral dis-engagement in the auditing profession. This research is a survey research and the statistical sample of the research includes 229 auditors working in auditing organizations and private auditing firms that listed  on  the Iranian  Association of Certified Public  Accountants .The information needed for the current research was collected by completing the questionnaire in 2022 and using the available sampling method. The results of the research show that moral dis-engagement and social domination are not significantly different between women and men, auditors of auditing organizations and private auditing firms, as well as among auditors with different educational levels. Also, research evidence confirms that there is a positive and significant relationship between social dominance and auditors' moral dis-engagement. Gender, work experience, education and place of employment of the auditor has no significant relationship with moral dis-engagement. The results of this research can inform policy makers of the auditing profession about the level of moral disengagement and social dominance of auditors and also the relationship between these two variables.
 
Keywords: Social Dominance, Moral Dis-Engagement, Auditors and Auditing Profession
Full-Text [PDF 887 kb]   (473 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/10/29 | Accepted: 2022/11/12 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Andersen, J. 2010. Public versus Private Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behavior , Public Administration Review 70(1): 131-141
2. Bandura A. 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3(3): 193–209.
3. Bedi, A. 2020. A meta-analytic review of paternalistic leadership, Applied Psychology 69(3): 960-1008.
4. Bronchain, J, P. Raynal. and H,Chabrol. 2019. The network structure of psychopathic personality traits in a non-institutionalized sample. Personality and Individual Differences 146(2):41–45.
5. Detert, J, L. Treviño. And V. Sweitzer. 2008. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(2): 374- 391.
6. Duckitt, J, and C. Sibley. 2009. A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry 20(2–3), 98–109.
7. Eutsler J. 2017. Examining Moral Disengagement as a Threat to Professional Skepticism . Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2972187
8. Fleischmann, A, and J. Lammers. 2020. Power and moral thinking , Current Opinion in Psychology 33(2):23–27
9. Heaven, P, and S. Bucci, S. 2001. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: An analysis using the IPIP measure. European Journal of Personality 15(3): 49-56.
10. Hunt, S, and S. Vitell. 2006. The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macro marketing 26(2): 143–153.
11. Islam, T, A. Sharif. and S. Jamil. 2022. Zooming into paternalistic leadership: evidence from high power distance culture, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, ol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. Available at : doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-05-2021-0149
12. Kim, K.H, and A. Guinote. 2021. Cheating at the Top: Trait Dominance Explains Dishonesty More Consistently Than Social Power , Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20(1):1–16.
13. Lalot, F, M.Jauch. and D. Abrams. 2022. Look past the divide: Social dominance, authoritarianism, future thinking, and superordinate identity underlie the political divide on environmental issues, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 3(4):25-41.
14. Leão, F, and D. Gomes. 2022. The stereotype of accountants: using a personality approach to assess the perspectives of laypeople, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 35 ( 9): 234-271.
15. Martins, S. 2020. Abusive supervision and moral disengagement: The role of ethical climate and team size [Dissertação de mestrado, Iscte - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa]. Repositório Iscte. Ph.D Dissertation:1-54.
16. Moore, C, R.Detert. L. Treviño. V. Baker. and D.Mayer. 2012. Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Person. Psychol. 65: 1–48.
17. Mowchan,M, J. Low. And P. Reckers. 2015. Antecedents to Unethical Corporate Conduct: Characteristics of the Complicit Follower. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 27(2):95-126.
18. Neuman, L 2006. Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Third Edition. London: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Orudzheva, L. 2022. Reconciling stakeholder demands: a social dominance perspective, Social Responsibility Journal, 18(7): 1229-1250.
20. Piff, P. K., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Keltner, D. 2012. Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 09(11):4086-4091.
21. Pratto, F, J. Sidanius. and S.Levin.2006. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17:271-320.
22. Rengifo , M., Laham , S.,M., (2022) Big Five personality predictors of moral disengagement: A comprehensive aspect-level approach , Personality and Individual Differences 184 (1): 1-10.
23. Rom, S, and P. Conway. 2018. The strategic moral self: self-presentation shapes moral dilemma judgments. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 74(3):24–37.
24. Scholl, A, K. Sassenberg. N. Ellemers. D. Scheepers. and F.deWit. 2018. Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology 57(1):112–129.
25. Tan, X, L. Liu. W. Zheng and Z. Huang. 2016. Effects of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on corrupt intention: The role of moral Outrage , International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 51( 3): 213–219.
26. Valerie A, V. Torres. M. Kovbasyuk. O. Addo. T. Ferreir. and C., Cristina , M., 2017. The Relationship Between Social Cynicism Belief, Social Dominance Orientation, and the Perception of Unethical Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Examination in Russia, Portugal, and the United States , Journal of Business Ethics , 146(1):545–562.
27. Wilson, M. 2003 Social Dominance and Ethical Ideology:The End Justifies the Means? The Journal of Social Psychology 143(5): 549-558.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Malaki D, Banimahd B, Vakilifard H. The Relationship Between Social Dominance and Moral Dis-Engagement: Evidence from the Auditing Profession. aapc 2022; 7 (13) :200-223
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1127-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 13 (9-2022) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.19 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645