[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Aims& Scopes
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Guide for Authors
Submission Form
Peer Review Process::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 4, Issue 7 (9-2019) ::
aapc 2019, 4(7): 209-239 Back to browse issues page
How Effectiveness Of Comprehensive Performance Measurement Systems on Manager's Performance Through Modification of Mental Models (Learning Process)
Donya Ahadian Poor Parvin1 , Fereydoon Rahnamay Roodposhti 2, Hashem Nikoomaram3 , Ramezanali Royaee4
1- Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch,Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran. (donyaahadiyan@yahoo.com)
2- Prof,Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University ,Tehran, Iran. (corresponding author), , rahnama.roodposhti@gmail.com
3- Prof,Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University ,Tehran, Iran.(h-nikoumaram@srbiau.ac.ir)
4- Assistant Prof ,Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University ,Tehran, Iran.(r.royaee@srbiau.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (2708 Views)
One of the ways to reduce agency costs is to plan for the creation of effective decision-making information by designing appropriate comprehensive performance evaluation systems according to managers' learning process
One of the important factors in the processing and classification of information for cognitive learning is mental models that are categorized in two dimensions of mental model confirmation and mental model building.
managers mental model confirmation leads to the refinement, modification and expansion of existing mental models, and mental model building improves the flexibility, creativity and innovation for managers in the face on new information
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on the performance of managers by modifying the modalities of the two aspect of learning at the individual level (mental model confirmation, mental model building.
This study was performed functional and descriptive-survey approach. The data were collected using a sample of 250 managers in manufacturing companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange for the period 2015-2016 with Using structural equation have been analyzed, The results indicate that Comprehensive performance evaluation systems in any two aspects of learning (build and confirmed mental model) have a significant positive and meaningful effect on the modification of the mental models, Of course, this effect is more in the building of mental models. Also, the development of mental models in both dimensions of building and confirmation improves the performance of managers.
Therefore, encouraging learning with incentive contracts based on the information provided by the comprehensive performance measurement systems is effective in improving the performance of managers and reducing the cost agency.
Keywords: manager's performance measurement systems, mental model confirmation, mental model building, financial and non-financial criteria
Full-Text [PDF 454 kb]   (1028 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/10/31 | Accepted: 2018/01/26 | Published: 2019/09/15
References
1. Argyris, C. 1990. The dilemma of implementing controls: the case of managerial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15: 503-511.
2. Ashford, S.J. 1986. Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resources perspective. Academy of Management Journal 29(3) :465-487.
3. Beyer,J.M.,Chattopadhyay,P., George,E., Glick, W.H,Ogilvie, D.,Pugliese,D. 1997.The selective perception of managers revisited. The Academy of Management Journal 40(3): 716-737
4. Bhimani, A. 2003. A study of the emergence of management Accounting System ethos and its influence on perceived system success. Accounting,Organizations and society 28 (6): 523-548.
5. Bianca, A.C.GroenMarc, J.F. 2012.Why do employees take more initiatives to improve their performance after co-developing performance measures? A field study. Management Accounting Research23(2): 120-141
6. Boedker C., Chua W. F. 2013. Accounting as an Affective Technology: A Study of Circulation, Agency and Entrancement. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38: 245–67.
7. Burkert, Michael, Fischer, Franz. 2011. Application of the controllability principle and managerial performance: The role of perceptions. Management Accounting Research 22 :143–159.
8. Burney,L.L.,Widener,S.K. 2007 . Strategic performance measurement systems job-relevant informationand managerial behavioral responses –role stress and performance.Behavioral Research in Accounting 19. 43-69.
9. Chenhall, Robert H. and Hall, Matthew and Smith, David. 2014. The Expressive Role of Performance Measurement Systems: A Field Study of a Mental Health Development Project. Accounting,Organizations and Society, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2523872
10. Chenhall, Robert H. Hall, Matthew. Smith, David. 2010. Social Capital and Management Control Systems: A Study of a Non-Government Organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (8): 737-756.
11. Chong M. Lau, BrigitteOger. 2012. Behavioral effects of fairness in performance measurement and evaluation systems: Empirical evidence from France. Advances in Accounting28(2): 323–332.
12. Cushen, J. 2013. Financialization in the workplace: Hegemonic narratives, performative interventions and the angry knowledge worker. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38: 314–331.
13. Hall,Matthew. 2008. The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance.Management Accounting Reasearch33(2-3):141-163.
14. Hall, Matthew. 2011. Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers mental model development?.Management Accounting Reasearch 22: 68–83
15. Henri,J . 2006. Organizational culture and performance measurements. Accounting organization and society 31: 77-103.
16. Ittner, C.D.,Larcker , D.F., Rajan, M.V. 1997 . The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts . The Accounting Review 72: 231-255.
17. Kaplan,R.S., Norton, D.P. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system . Harvard Business Review : 75-85.
18. Kaplan, Robert S. 2009. Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Working Paper. Faculty Unit(s): Accounting and Management : 10-74
19. Kober, R., Ngb, J. & Paul, B. J. 2007.The interrelationship between management control mechanisms and strategy. Management Accounting Research18(4): 425-452.
20. Krishnan, R. Luft , J., Shields , M. 2005 . Effects of accounting – method choices on subjective performance measure weighting: experimental evidence on precision and error covariance. The Accounting Review 80: 1163-1192.
21. Kunz, J. 2015 .Objectivity and subjectivity in performance evaluation and autonomous motivation: An exploratory study. Management Accounting Research.Volume27: 27-46
22. Luft,J.L., Shields,M.D.,2001. Why does fixation persist? Experimental evidence on the judgement performance effects of expensing intangibles. The Accounting Review 76: 561-587.
23. Mandy M. Cheng, Rodney Coyte.2013. The effects of incentive subjectivity and strategy communication on knowledge-sharing and extra-role behaviours. Management Accounting Research,Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2288186
24. March, J.G. 1991 . Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71-87.
25. Marginson, D, McAulay, L, Roush, M, Zijl, T. 2014. Examining a positive psychological role for performance measures. Management Accounting Research25(1):63-75.
26. Otley, David. Ferriira, Aldonio. 2009. The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Reasearch20: 263–282.
27. Padsakoff, P. Mackenzi,B. Lee,J. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Criticsl Review of Literature and Recommended Remedies. journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879-903.
28. Santos, Monica. Lucianetti, Lorenzo. 2012. Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Reasearch23( 2): 79–19.
29. Speklé, F,Verbeeten ,H. 2014. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research25(2): 131-146.
30. Sprinkle, G.B. 2000. The effect of incentive contracts and learning and performance .The Accounting Review 75: 299-326.
31. Vandenbosch, B. 1999 . An empirical analysis of the association between the executive support system and perceived organizational competitiveness. Accounting ,Organization and Society 24: 77-92.
32. Wall, T. D. Michie, J. Patterson, M. Wood, S. J. Sheehan, M. Clegg, C. W., West, M. 2004. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology 57: 95-118.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahadian Poor Parvin D, Rahnamay Roodposhti F, Nikoomaram H, Royaee R. How Effectiveness Of Comprehensive Performance Measurement Systems on Manager's Performance Through Modification of Mental Models (Learning Process). aapc 2019; 4 (7) :209-239
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-284-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 4, Issue 7 (9-2019) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666