1. Birnberg, J. G., Shields, J. F., (1989). Three decades of behavioral accounting research: A search for order, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1, pp:23-74. 2. Birnberg, J.C., (2011). A proposed framework for behavioral accounting research, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), pp:1-43. 3. Birnberg, J.C., (2012). Is neuroaccounting waiting in the wings? An essay, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), pp:1-13. 4. Birnberg, J.G. Luft, J. Shields, M.D. (2006). Psychology theory in management accounting research. In: Chapman, C. S. Hopwood, A. G., Shields, M. D., (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research”, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Cardinaels, E., (2008). The interplay between cost accounting knowledge and presentation formats in cost-based decision making, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, pp:582-602 6. Croson, R., (2005). The method of experimental economics, International Negotiation, 10, pp:131-148. 7. Dalla Via, N., (2012), Behavioral management accounting and control: The origins of a stream of research, thesis Ph.D. in Business granted by the University of Venice. 8. DiMaggio, W. Powell, P. (1991). Introduction. In: DiMaggio, W. Powell, P. (Eds.), the new institutionalism in organizational analysis, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 9. Dunk, A. S., (2001).Behavioral research in management accounting: The past, present, and future, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 4, pp:25-45. 10. Hageman, A.M., (2008). A review of the strengths and weaknesses of archival, behavioral, and qualitative research methods: recognizing the potential benefits of triangulation, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, vol(11), pp:1-30. 11. Hopwood, A. (2002). If only there were simple solutions, but there aren’t: some reflections on Zimmerman’s critique of empirical management accounting research, The European Accounting Review, vol.11(4), p:777-785. 12. Hopwood, A. (2009). Reflections and projections – and many, many thanks, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, pp:887-894. 13. Ittner, C. Larcker, D. (2002). “Empirical management accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice”. The European Accounting Review, 11(4), pp:787-794. 14. Lipe, M. Salterio, S. (2000). The balanced scorecard: judgment effects of common and unique performance measures,The Accounting Review, 75, 283-298. 15. Luft, J. Shields, M. (2002).Zimmerman’s contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research,The European Accounting Review, 11(4), pp:795-803. 16. Lukka, K. Mouritsen, J. (2002).Homogeneity and heterogeneity of research in management accounting, The European Accounting Review, 11(4),pp: 805-811. 17. Merchant, K.A. Otley, D.T. (2007). A review of the literature on control and accountability, in Chapman, C.S. Hopwood, A.G. Shields, M.D. (Eds.) Handbook of management accounting research,vol 2, Elsevier, Oxford, UK; P:29. 18. Miller, P. (2007). Management accounting and sociology. In: Chapman, C. S. Hopwood, A. G. Shields, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 19. Moers, F. (2005).Discretion and bias in performance evaluation: the impact of diversity and subjectivity, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, pp:67-80. 20. Otley, David, (2016).The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014, Management Accounting Research 21. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2002).Behavioral management accounting,Quorum Books, Westport, CT. 22. Shields, J.F. Shields, M.D. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 23(1), pp:49-76 23. Sprinkle, G.B. (2000). The effect of incentive contracts on learning and performance, The Accounting Review, 67,pp: 783-801. 24. Zimmerman, J. L. (2001).Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research,Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, pp:411-427
|