[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) ::
aapc 2021, 6(11): 217-249 Back to browse issues page
Development and evaluation of model of implementation barriers, disclosure and standardization of corporate sustainability in Iran
Darioush Akhtarshenas1 , Ahmad Khodamipour 2, Omid Pourheidari3
1- Ph. D in Accounting, Lecturer of Accounting Department of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran(Darioushakhtarshenas89@gmail.com)
2- Associate Professor of Accounting, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran(Corresponding Author) , Khodamipour@uk.ac.ir
3- Professor of Accounting, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran(Opourheidari@uk.ac.ir)
Abstract:   (6348 Views)
Corporate sustainability plays a key role in integrating and pursuing the economic, social and environmental goals of companies. The purpose of this study is the development and evaluation of model of implementation barriers, disclosure and standardization of corporate sustainability in Iran. In this study, with the help of interviews with 20 experts by using a snowball sampling method based on the thematic analysis of the interviews, the research model has been developed. Also, in order to assess the validity of the presented model, using a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity and reliability were confirmed, the opinions of 123 experts were received in 2019 and analyzed. Research findings indicate that, lack of coherent legal requirements, weak infrastructure in the field of education, technology and human resources, and underdeveloped accountability and accountability system and lack of demands of the society are the most important of implementation barriers corporate sustainability. From the perspective of this study, non-mandatory sustainability reporting, the lack of a standard for sustainability reporting and the lack of a model and the difficulty of measuring corporate sustainability are the most important of barriers to disclosing corporate sustainability. The findings also، showed that the quality of corporate sustainability and the difficulty of formulating the standard for it are the most important of barrier to formulating the standard for corporate sustainability. Accordingly, it is suggested to government and companies to provide the infrastructure, capacity and facilities needed to implement corporate sustainability. It is also suggested to Corporate Audit and the Securities Exchange Organization to take the necessary steps for codification corporate sustainability laws and standard.
Keywords: Corporate sustainability, Thematic Analysis, Environmental, Sustainability reporting.
Full-Text [PDF 599 kb]   (912 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/09/8 | Accepted: 2020/11/12 | Published: 2021/08/23
References
1. Aksoy, M., M. K. Yilmaz, E. Tatoglu, and M. Basar. 2020. Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 276: 1-11.
2. Bona-Sanchez, C., J. Perez-Aleman, and D. J. Santana-Martin. 2017. Sustainability disclosure, dominant owners and earnings informativeness. Research in International Business and Finance 39 (1): 625-639.
3. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3 (2): 77-101.
4. Bremser, W. G. 2014. A Growing Interest in Sustainability Paving the Way for the Next Generation of CPAs. The CPA Journal: 15-17.
5. Correa-Garcia, J. A., M. A. Garcia-Benau, and E. Garcia-Meca. 2020. Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. Journal of Cleaner Production. 260: 1-12.
6. Farneti, F., and J. Guthrie. 2009. Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations: Why they report. Accounting Forum 33 (2): 89-98.
7. Gallego-Alvareza, I., and E. Ortas. 2016. Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach. International Business Review 26 (2): 337–353.
8. Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., O. Suarez-Fernandez, and J. Martinez-Ferrero. 2019. Female directors and impression management in sustainability reporting. International Business Review 28 (2): 359-374.
9. Hopkins, M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility: an issue paper. Working Paper, 27, International Labour Organisation. Geneva.
10. Jesica, F. 2011. Sustainability performance management. Accenture and Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
11. KPMG. 2011. KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting.
12. Kraten, M. 2014. Sustainability the Accounting Perspective. The CPA Journal: 11-14.
13. Lang, M., K. V. Lins, and M. Maffett. 2012. Transparency, Liquidity, and Valuation: International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (3): 729-774.
14. Mahmood, Z., R. Kouser, W. Ali, Z. Ahmad, and T. Salman. 2018. Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability 10 (1): 207-226.
15. McGuire, J. B. 1963. Business and Society. McGraw-Hill. New York.
16. Ng, A. C., and Z. Rezaee. 2015. Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance 34: 128-149.
17. Parmar, B. L., R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, S. de Colle, and L. Purnell. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press. New York.
18. Ray, S., and B. R. Chaudhuri. 2018. Business Group Affiliation and Corporate Sustainability Strategies of Firms: An Investigation of Firms in India. Journal of Business Ethics 153 (4): 955-976.
19. Rezaee, Z., L. Tuo. 2019. Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality? Journal of Business Ethics 155 (8): 763-786.
20. Sneirson, J. F. 2009. Green is good: Sustainability, Profitability, and a New Paradigm for Corporate Governance. Iowa Law Review 94 (3): 987-1022.
21. Wiengarten, F., C. K. Y. Lo, and J. Y. K. Lam. 2017. How does Sustainability Leadership Affect Firm Performance? The Choices Associated with Appointing a Chief Officer of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 140 (3): 477-493.
22. Zhang, J. 2017. Users’ perceptions of the drivers for corporate sustainability disclosures made by Chinese listed companies. Theses: Doctorates and Masters, Edith Cowan University.
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akhtarshenas D, Khodamipour A, Pourheidari O. Development and evaluation of model of implementation barriers, disclosure and standardization of corporate sustainability in Iran. aapc 2021; 6 (11) :217-249
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-884-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 11 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.1 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666