A Study of the Effect of the Audit Partner’s Perceived Support on the Neutrality-Oriented and Skepticism-Based Approaches in Professional Skepticism and the Auditor’s Behavioral Outcomes

Bameri, Marzieh; Safari Gerayli, Mehdi; Valiyan, Hasan

doi:10.29252/aapc.4.8.93

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Editorial Board

Articles archive

Publication Ethics

For Authors

Peer Review Process

Registration

Site Facilities

Contact us

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 4, Issue 8 (2-2020)

aapc 2020, 4(8): 93-129

Back to browse issues page

A Study of the Effect of the Audit Partner’s Perceived Support on the Neutrality-Oriented and Skepticism-Based Approaches in Professional Skepticism and the Auditor’s Behavioral Outcomes

Marzieh Bameri¹

, Mehdi Safari Gerayli

², Hasan Valiyan³

1- Msc.Student Department of Accounting, Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran(bamerimarzye@gmail.com)
2- Associate Professor Department of accounting,Bandargaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz,Iran.(corresponding author) , Mehdi.safari83@yahoo.com
3- Assistant Professor Department of Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.(Hasan.Valiyan@yahoo.com)

Abstract: (5892 Views)

Professional skepticism in auditing is a very important topic that refers to the application of a degree of auditors' professional care within the framework of the audit standards and based on an objective assessment of the evidence provided by their clients. Indeed, it facilitates high quality professional judgment and provides stakeholders with more reliable information. The present study is primarily concerned with scrutinizing the impact of the audit partner’s perceived support the neutrality-oriented and skepticism-based approaches in professional skepticism and the auditor’s behavioral outcomes. An audit partner’s perceived support accounts for the audit partners’ role in supporting auditors’ professional skepticism and promotes the quality of the information under investigation. The statistical population of the study includes the auditors of Audit Organization and private audit firms, which have been randomly selected. The research employs a questionnaire sent to 294 auditors. This research was carried out during the first 6 months of 2018 and The Partial Least Square model is adopted to test the research hypotheses. The results reveal that audit partner’s perceived support has a negative and significant effect on the auditors’ skepticism-based perspective, whereas it has a significantly positive effect on the auditors’ neutrality-oriented attitude. The findings also suggest that audit partner’s perceived support positively influences the professional skepticism with organizational perceived support. Finally, audit partner’s perceived support positively affects citizenship behavior and behavioral commitment, though it intensifies the negative impact of organizational perceived support with auditors’ substitution. These findings significantly enhance auditors’ technical and behavioral performances regarding both their perceptual or internal states and audit partners’ supports as this leads to better understanding of auditors’ internal needs as well as promoting the dynamic relationship between audit partners and auditors to improve audit quality.

Keywords: Auditors’ Professional Skepticism, Audit Partner’s Perceived Support, Firm’s Perceived Support, Auditor’s Behavioral Outcomes, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Behavioral Commitment

Full-Text [PDF 331 kb] (862 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/09/17 | Accepted: 2018/12/25 | Published: 2020/02/8

References

1. Asbahr, K., Klaus, A. (2017), Real Effects of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Auditors' Judgment of Accounting Estimate. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3069755 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069755

2. Bell, T. B., Peecher, M. E. Solomon, I. (2005), The 21st century public company audit: conceptual elements of KPMG’s global audit methodology. New York: KPMG LLP.

3. Brazel, J, F., Gimbar, Ch., Maksymov, E., Schaefer, T, R. (2018), The Outcome Effect and Professional Skepticism: A Replication and an Attempt at Mitigation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3140647 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140647

4. Brazel, J. F., Jackson, S. B., Schaefer, T. J., & Stewart, B. W. (2016), The outcome effect and professional skepticism. The Accounting Review, 91(12), pp. 1577-1599.

5. Carpenter, T. D., & Reimers, J. L. (2013), Professional skepticism: The effects of a partner's influence and the level of fraud indicators on auditors' fraud judgments and actions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), pp. 45-69.

6. Cohen, J. R., Dalton, D, W., Harp, N, L. (2017), Neutral and presumptive doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes, Accounting, Organizations and Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003

7. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M.W., Heian, J. B., & Samuel, S. (1998), The calculated and avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(12) , pp. 293-327.

8. Cushing, B. E. (2000), Economic analysis of skepticism in an audit setting. In 14th Symposium on Auditing Research, eds. Solomon, I. And Peecher, 1-3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Office of Accounting Research.

9. Dalton, D. W., Cohen, J. R., Harp, N. L., & McMillan, J. J. (2014), Antecedents and consequences of perceived gender discrimination in the audit profession. Auditing. Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(11) , pp. 1-32.

10. Dawley, D., Houghton, J. D., & Bucklew, N. S. (2010), Perceived organizational support and turnover intention: The mediating effects of personal sacrifice and job fit. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(10) ,pp. 238-257.

11. Deconinck, J. (2010), The Effect of Organizational Justice, Perceived Organizational Support, and Perceived Supervisor Support on Marketing Employees’ Level of Trust, Journal of Business Research. 63(12), pp. 1349-1355.

12. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986), Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4) , pp. 500-507.

13. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002), Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(18), pp. 565-573.

14. Franzel, J. (2013), Protecting investors by seizing the opportunity to strengthen audit quality presented at the American Accounting Association (AAA) Midyear Conference. New Orleans, LA. Available via https://pcaobus.org/News/Speech/Pages/ 01182013_New%20Orleans.aspx.

15. Fu, F. Q., Bolander, W. & Jones, E. (2009), Managing the drivers of organizational commitment and salesperson effort: An application of Meyer and Allen's three-component model, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(4), pp. 335-350.

16. Gouldner, A. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(13), pp. 53-62.

17. Hurtt, R. K. (2010), Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29 (1), pp. 149–171.

18. Hurtt, R.K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C.E. & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013), Research on Auditor Professional Skepticism: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research, A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1) pp.45-97.

19. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2012), Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. New York: IFAC.

20. Kornberger, M., Carter, C., & Ross-Smith, A. (2010), Changing gender domination in a Big Four accounting firm: Flexibility, performance and client service in practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(21), pp. 775-791.

21. Kusumawati, A., Syamsuddin, S. (2018), The effect of auditor quality to professional skepticsm and its relationship to audit quality. International Journal of Law and Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2017-0062

22. Lavelle, J. J., Rupp, D. E., & Brockner, J. (2007), Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice, social exchange, and citizenship behavior: The target similarity model,Journal of Management. 33(11), pp. 841-866.

23. Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002), Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(19), pp. 131-142.

24. Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999), Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, pp. 467-483.

25. McMillan, J. J. & White, R. A. (1993), Auditors’ belief revisions and evidence search: The effect of hypothesis frame, confirmation and professional skepticism, The Accounting Review, 68 (3), pp.443-465.

26. Nadler, Ch, J., Kadous, K. (2018), Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67(4), pp. 1–14.

27. Nelson, M. (2009), A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28 (2), pp. 1-34.

28. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2008), Proposed auditing standards related to the auditor’s assessment of and response to risk and conforming Amendments to PCAOB standards. PCAOB Release No. 2008- 006. Stamford, CT: PCAOB.

29. Rich, J., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. (1997), The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3), pp.481-505.

30. Sahlins, M. (1972), Stone age economics. New York: Aldine.

31. Viator, R. E., & Pasewark, W. R. (2005), Mentorship separation tension in the accounting profession: The consequences of delayed structural separation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(77), pp.371-387.

Add your comments about this article

‎ 10.29252/aapc.4.8.93

‎ 20.1001.1.24767166.1398.4.8.1.4

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Bameri M, Safari Gerayli M, Valiyan H. A Study of the Effect of the Audit Partner’s Perceived Support on the Neutrality-Oriented and Skepticism-Based Approaches in Professional Skepticism and the Auditor’s Behavioral Outcomes. aapc 2020; 4 (8) :93-129
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-510-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 4, Issue 8 (2-2020)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645