[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Editorial Board ::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
For Authors::
Peer Review Process::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 14 (3-2023) ::
aapc 2023, 7(14): 35-75 Back to browse issues page
Developing and presenting a conceptual model for managing knowledge sharing behavior in the Iranian auditing profession
Safiye Bakhshani1 , Mohammad Ali Bagherpour Velashani 2, Mohammad Reza Abbaszadeh3
1- PhD Student, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran. (bakhshanis@yahoo.com)
2- Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad,Iran.(Corresponding Author) , bagherpour@um.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administrative sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran. (abbas33@um.acir)
Abstract:   (2491 Views)
Human behavior in organizations is very complex because it is affected by the interaction of many factors such as management measures, competitive environment and new technologies. People have personality differences, and how people behave in groups will be different. The occurrence of knowledge sharing behavior is no exception to this rule and the behavior intent of individuals will change under the influence of various factors. In this study, using grounded theory, causal conditions, main phenomenon, underlying factors and intervening factors around knowledge sharing in the auditing profession were identified. Through interviews with 20 experts in 2022, the underlying theory of "knowledge sharing behavior management in the auditing profession" was extracted from 29 categories. Eight strategic categories were extracted from the interviews: Strengthening commitment and responsibility, creating motivation, creating technology infrastructure, regularity, obligation and supervision, creating the ground for the transfer of foreign knowledge and modelling, paving the way for the sharing and exchange of knowledge between auditing institutions, culture building and promoting organizational climate. Eight consequence categories were also extracted: Achieving public and social interests, institutionalizing and internalizing knowledge sharing behavior, facilitating knowledge sharing, demonstrating and aligning with professional and legal behavior, receiving knowledge, methods and up-to-date tools; Transfer and exchange of knowledge in similar environmental conditions, compliance with cultural norms, sense of belonging to the organization and job satisfaction. The findings of this study can be used by professional associations to develop requirements or provide guidelines to promote knowledge sharing in auditing firms.
Keywords: Knowledge Sharing, Auditing, Behavior Management
Full-Text [PDF 842 kb]   (400 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/02/22 | Accepted: 2022/04/29 | Published: 2023/03/20
References
1. Adejumo, G., P.R, Duimering; & Z, Zhong. 2008. A balance theory approach to group problem solving. Social Networks, 30(1): 83-99.
2. Al Kashari, Z., and F. Al Taheri. 2019. The Role of Knowledge Sharing in Organizational Performance. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 62(1): 30-38.
3. Al-Busaidi, K. A., and L, Olfman. 2017. Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational knowledge sharing systems. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(1): 110-136
4. Al-Emran, M., and T, Teo. 2020. Do knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing really affect e-learning adoption? An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3): 1983-1998.
5. Alavi, M., and D. E, Leidner. 2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, (25)1:107-136.
6. Albawwat, I. E. 2021. Tacit knowledge sharing in small audit firms and audit quality inputs: the antecedent effect of auditors’ social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2021-0113.
7. Ali, M., Ali, I., Albort-Morant, G., and A. L Leal-Rodríguez. 2021. How do job insecurity and perceived well-being affect expatriate employees’ willingness to share or hide knowledge? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1): 185-210.
8. Amin, A., Bargach, S., Donrgan, J. and Others. 2001. Building a Knowledge-Sharing Culture. Oilfield Review, 13(1):48-65.
9. Argote, L., P, Ingram., J.M, Levine., and R.L., Moreland. 2000. Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1): 1-8.
10. Baskerville, R., and A, Dulipovici. 2006. The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(2): 83-105.
11. Bhath.G.D. 2000. A resource‐based perspective of developing organizational capabilities for business transformation. knowledge and process management, 7(2):9-129
12. Bishop, J., D, Bouchlaghem., J, Glass., and I, Matsumoto. 2008. Ensuring the effectiveness of a knowledge management initiative. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12 (4): 16-29.
13. Bock, G. W., R.W, Zmud., Y. G, Kim., and J.N, Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 29(1): 87-111.
14. Bock, G. W., Y.G, Kim. 2002. Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2): 14-21.
15. Boer, N. I., H, Berends., and P, Van Baalen. 2011. Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior. European management journal, 29(2): 85-97
16. Burns, N., and S. K, Grove. 2006. Understanding nursing research, building an evidence-based practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Co.
17. Chow, C. W., J.L, Ho., S.C Vera-Munoz. 2008. Exploring the extent and determinants of knowledge sharing in audit engagements. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2): 141-160.
18. Coun, M. M., P.C, Peters., and R.R, Blomme. 2019. ‘Let's share!’The mediating role of employees' self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4): 481-491
19. Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20. Davarpanah, M.M., & M, Salari. 2011. Social Theory and the Information Use Environment. Library and Information Science Research, 1(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/riis.v1i1.3311
21. Davenport, T. H., L, Prusak. 1998. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
22. Dayan, R., P, Heisig., and F, Matos. 2017. Knowledge management as a factor for the formulation and implementation of organization strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management. 21(2): 308-329
23. Ding, C. Q., J, Xue., and J, Yuan. 2015. Research on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Willingness in Trust Perspective—Empirical Analysis on Communication Enterprises. In 2015 International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering: 547-550
24. Duh, R. R., W.R, Knechel., and C.C, Lin. 2020. The Effects of Audit Firms' Knowledge Sharing on Audit Quality and Efficiency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 39(2): 51-79. Francis, J. R. 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A journal of practice and theory, 30(2): 125-152.
25. Dyer, J. H., and K, Nobeoka. 2000. Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic management journal, 21(3): 345-367.
26. Evans, M. M. 2012. Knowledge sharing: An empirical study of the role of trust and other social-cognitive factors in an organizational setting (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
27. Fontanella, B. J. B., B.M, Luchesi., M.G.B, Saidel., J, Ricas., E.R, Turato., & D.G, Melo. 2011. Sampling in qualitative research: a proposal for procedures to detect theoretical saturation. Cadernos de saude publica, 27(2): 388-394.
28. Fteimi, N. and F, Lehner. 2016. Main Research Topics in Knowledge Management: A Content Analysis of ECKM Publications. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1): 5-17.
29. Goh, S. K., and M.S, Sandhu. 2013. Affiliation, reciprocal relationships and peer pressure in knowledge sharing in public Universities in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 9(7): 290-298.
30. Golafshani, N. 2003. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607.
31. Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation,
32. Gupta, A., and J, McDaniel. 2002. Creating competitive advantage by effectively managing knowledge: A framework for knowledge management. Journal of knowledge Management practice, 3(2):40-49.
33. Haas, M. R., and M.T, Hansen. 2007. Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic management journal, 28(11): 1133-1153.
34. Haesebrouck, K., A, Van den Abbeele., and M.G, Williamson. 2021. Building trust through knowledge sharing: Implications for incentive system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society,93, 101241: 1-16
35. Han, S. H., D.Y, Yoon., B, Suh., B, Li., and C, Chae. 2019. Organizational support on knowledge sharing: a moderated mediation model of job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(4): 687-704.
36. Hendriks, P. 1999. Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and process management, 6(2): 91-100.
37. Hoque, Z., L.D, Parker., M.A, Covaleski., and K. Haynes. (Eds.). 2017. The Routledge companion to qualitative accounting research methods. (Mehrabanpur, M., Mostafaei, A., and Mostafaei, J, Trans.). Taylor and Francis.
38. Hsu, C. L., and J.C.C, Lin. 2008. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information and management, 45(1): 65-74.
39. Huang, C. C., & T.H, Chen. 2015. Moral norm and the two-component theory of planned behavior model in predicting knowledge sharing intention: A role of mediator desire. Psychology, 6(13), 1685.
40. Hung, S. Y., A, Durcikova., H.M, Lai., and W.M, Lin. 2011. The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6): 415-427.
41. Ipe, M. 2003. Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework, Human Resource Development Review, 10(4): 337-359.
42. Jalili, Y. A., and S, Ghaleh. 2020. Knowledge sharing and the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51 (2): 236-258.
43. Jashapara, A. 2010. Knowledge Management. New York: Financial Times/ Prentice Hall.
44. Kalkan, V. D. 2008. An overall view of knowledge management challenges for global business. Business Process Management Journal, 14 (3): 390-400
45. Khorakian, A., H, Mohammadi Shahroodi., M, Jahangir., and Z, Nikkhah Farkhani. 2019. Innovative work behavior in public organizations: The roles of ethical and knowledge sharing behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2): 164-173.
46. Kools, S., M, McCarthy., R, Durham., and L, Robrecht. 1996. Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 312-330.
47. Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Lai, P. H., S.T, Chuang., M.C, Zhang., and S.K, Nepal. 2020. The non-profit sharing economy from a social exchange theory perspective: a case from World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(12): 1970-1987.
49. Law, C. C., and E.W, Ngai. 2008. An empirical study of the effects of knowledge sharing and learning behaviors on firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 34(4): 2342-2349.
50. Lee, H., and B, Choi. 2003. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of management information systems, 20(1): 179-228.
51. Lee, J. C., Y.C, Shiue., and C.Y, Chen. 2016. Examining the impacts of organizational culture and top management support of knowledge sharing on the success of software process improvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 54: 462-474.
52. Lee, Y. H., T.E, Lu., C.C, Yang., and G, Chang. 2019. A multilevel approach on empowering leadership and safety behavior in the medical industry: The mediating effects of knowledge sharing and safety climate. Safety Science, 117: 1-9.
53. Levallet, N., and Y.E, Chan. 2019. Organizational knowledge retention and knowledge loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 23(1):176-199.
54. Liu, W. C., andC.L, Fang. 2010. The effect of different motivation factors on knowledge-sharing willingness and behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 38(6): 753-758.
55. Lopes, A. 2010. Grounded theory method: an essential approach to analyse design. In The 9th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management: IE Business School Madrid, Spain: 24-25.
56. McCracken, G. 1988. The long interview, 13, Sage.
57. McFadyen, M. A., and A.A, Cannella Jr. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of management Journal, 47(5): 735-746.
58. Muhammed, S., and H, Zaim. 2020. Peer knowledge sharing and organizational performance: the role of leadership support and knowledge management success. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24 (10): 2455-2489
59. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Nguyen, L., and Y, Kohda. 2017. Toward a Knowledge Management Framework for Auditing Processes. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), 8(3): 45-67.
61. Nguyen, N. L. 2021. Tacit knowledge sharing within project teams: an application of social commitments theory. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, ahead-of-print, https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0123.
62. Nonaka, I., and H, Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge crating company. Oxford University press, oxford.UK: 26-38.
63. Nugroho, M. A. 2018. The effects of collaborative cultures and knowledge sharing on organizational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(5): 1138-1152.
64. Ogunmokun, O. A., K.K, Eluwole., T, Avci., T.T, Lasisi., and J.E, Ikhide. 2020. Propensity to trust and knowledge sharing behavior: An evaluation of importance-performance analysis among Nigerian restaurant employees. Tourism Management Perspectives, 33, 100590: 1-11.
65. Oyemomi, O., S, Liu., I, Neaga., H, Chen., and F, Nakpodia. 2019. How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 94: 313-319.
66. Park, J., H, Chae., and J. N, Choi. 2017. The need for status as a hidden motive of knowledge-sharing behavior: An application of costly signaling theory. Human Performance, 30(1): 21-37
67. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative evaluation and Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage Publications, Inc
68. Raghu, T. S., and A, Vinze. 2007. A business process context for Knowledge Management. Decision support systems, 43(3): 1062-1079.
69. Razak, N. A., F, Pangil., M. L. M, Zin., N. A, Yunus., and N.H, Asnawi. 2016. Theories of knowledge sharing behavior in business strategy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37: 545-553.
70. Renzl, B. 2008. Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2): 206-220.
71. Richards, B. A. 2014. A qualitative analysis of knowledge sharing: A grounded theory study examination of knowledge sharing (Doctoral dissertation, Bellevue University).
72. Richards, B. A. 2014. A qualitative analysis of knowledge sharing: A grounded theory study examination of knowledge sharing (Doctoral dissertation, Bellevue University).
73. Ryan, R. M., and E. L, Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1): 54-67.
74. Ryu, S., S.H, Ho., and I, Han. 2003. Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals. Expert Systems with applications, 25(1): 113-122.
75. Salleh, K. 2010. Tacit knowledge and accountants: Knowledge sharing model. Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, 2: 393-397.
76. Sedighi, M., S, Van Splunter., F, Brazier., C, Van Beers., and S. Lukosch. 2016. Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation: the roles of perceived benefits and costs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (6): 1247-1267.
77. Sharma, R. S., M. I. N. A, Iqbal., &, M. M, Victoriano. 2013. On the use of benchmarking and good practices for knowledge management for development. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 11(4): 346-360.
78. Soo, C. W., D, Midgley., and Y. M, Devinney. 2002. The process of knowledge creation in organizations. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.376080
79. Strauss, A., and J, Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques. (Afshar, E, Trans.). Sage Publications, Inc.
80. Sudarno, S., and N, Yulia. 2012. Intellectual Capital: Pendefinisian, Pengakuan, Pengukuran, Pelaporan Dan Pengungkapan. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Jember, 10(2): 54-62.
81. Tangaraja, G., and R.M, Rasdi., Ismail, M., and Samah, B. A. 2015. Fostering knowledge sharing behaviour among public sector managers: a proposed model for the Malaysian public service. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19 (1): 121-140
82. Taylor, W. A., and G.H, Wright. 2004. Organizational readiness for successful knowledge sharing: Challenges for public sector managers. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 17(2): 22-37.
83. Trivellas, P., Z, Akrivouli., E, Tsifora., and P, Tsoutsa. 2015. The impact of knowledge sharing culture on job satisfaction in accounting firms. The mediating effect of general competencies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19: 238-247.
84. Vera‐Munoz, S. C., J. L, Ho., and C. W, Chow. 2006. Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 20(2):133-155
85. Wang, H. C., J, He., and J.T, Mahoney. 2009. Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic management journal, 30(12):1265-1285.
86. Wang, S., and R. A, Noe. 2010. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2): 115-131.
87. Wiewiora, A., B, Trigunarsyah., G, Murphy., and V, Coffey. 2013. Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: A competing values perspective in Australian context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(8): 1163-1174.
88. Yakhlef, A., L, Sie., and P, Julen. 2009. The effects of rewards on the motivation of experts to transfer their knowledge. In Proceedings of the 8th EURAM (European Academy of Management) Conference, Ljubljana and Bled, Slovenia. Citeseer.
89. Yang, J. T., and C. S, Wan. 2004. Advancing organizational effectiveness and knowledge management implementation. Tourism Management, 25(5): 593-601.
90. Zheng, T. 2017. A literature review on knowledge sharing. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3): 1-8.
91. Zmerli, S., and K, Newton. 2008. Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public opinion quarterly, 72(4):706-724
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bakhshani S, Bagherpour Velashani M A, Abbaszadeh M R. Developing and presenting a conceptual model for managing knowledge sharing behavior in the Iranian auditing profession. aapc 2023; 7 (14) :35-75
URL: http://aapc.khu.ac.ir/article-1-1081-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 14 (3-2023) Back to browse issues page
دوفصلنامه علمی حسابداری ارزشی و رفتاری journal of Value & Behavioral  Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.09 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645